The playful divide: a new look at arguing for fun

References

• Cicchirillo, V., and Roberto, A. 2012. “Teasing by the Numbers: How Race and Gender Influence Teasing Behaviors.” Communication Research Reports 29: 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A. 2011. “Dialogue and Interpersonal Communication: How Informal Logic can Enhance our Understanding of the Dynamics of Close Relationships.” Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 3: 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., and Harden, J. M. 1989. “Primary and secondary Goals in the Production of Interpersonal Influence Messages.” Communication Monographs 56: 19–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. 2005a. Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. 2005b. “Argument Frames: An Initial Investigation into Operationalizations.” In Critical Problems in Argumentation, edited by Willard C. A., 568–576. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Sells, A., and Inclán Velázquez, A. L. 2009. “The Effects of Topic Type and Personalization of Conflict on Assessments of Fallacies.” Communication Reports 22: 74–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Han, B., and Payne, D. 2010. “The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments.” Argumentation 24: 405–421. doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9173-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegstrom, T. G. 1991, September. “The Accounts of Organizational Sissenters.” Paper presented at the University of Colorado Conference on Narrative and Organizational Studies in Communication, Keystone, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Huston, D. 1985. “What Should be the Goals of High School Debate?: An Examination and Prioritization.” Paper presented at the National Forensic League Conference on the State of High School Debate, Kansas City, MO. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, #ED272942.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S. 1982. “A Conceptualization and Measure of Argumentativeness.” Journal of Personality Assessment 46: 72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., and Wigley, C. J. 1986. “Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure.” Communication Monographs 53: 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J. 2002. “Beliefs about Arguing: A Comparison of Public Issue and Personal Issue Arguments.” Communication Reports 15,: 99–112. doi:10.1080/08934210209367757
   Google Scholar
• Kassing, J. W., and Avtgis, T. A. 1999. “Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Dissent and Aggressive Communication.” Management Communication Quarterly 13: 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzen, M. 2015. “The Normativity of Humor.” Philosophical Issues 25: 396–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., and Weinstock, M. 2000. “The Development of Epistemological Understanding.” Cognitive Development 15: 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. A., and Preacher, K. J. 2013. Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. 2011. Understanding Violence. The Intertwining of Morality, Religion and Violence: A Philosophical Stance. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., and Johnson, K. L. 2002. “Serial Arguing over the Relationship Life Course: Antecedents and Consequences.” In Stability and Change in Relationships, edited by Vangelisti, A. L., Reis, H. T., and Fitzpatrick, M. A., 107–128. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., and Dunkle, M. 2002. “Development and Validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory.” In Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, edited by Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich P. R., 261–275. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., and Kessler, J. W. 1991. “A Three Component Model of Children's Teasing: Aggression, Humor, and Ambiguity.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 10: 459–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp, R., and Hoff, N. 1985. “A Model of Serial Argument in Interpersonal Relationships.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 22: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. 1998. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar