93
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Argumentation in the Americas: Articles

Interpersonal arguing in Argentina

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 214-231 | Received 30 Oct 2022, Accepted 10 Oct 2022, Published online: 06 Nov 2022

References

  • Carballo, M. 2005. Valores culturales al cambio de milenio. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios Unión para la Nueva Mayoría.
  • Charles, M. 2017. “Venus, Mars, and Math: Gender, Societal Affluence, and Eighth Graders’ Aspirations for STEM.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3: 237802311769717–237802311769716. doi:10.1177/2378023117697179.
  • Charles, M, and K. Bradley. 2009. “Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (4): 924–976. doi:10.1086/595942.
  • Dębowska-Kozłowska, K., and D. Hample. 2022. “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys: How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing.” Argumentation 36 (3): 365–392. doi:10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w.
  • Etcheverry, G. J. 2001. La tragedia educativa. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Hample, D. 2018. Interpersonal Arguing. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Hample, D. 2020. “Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness Are Two Things Apiece.” In Networking Argument, edited by C. Winker, 453–458. New York: Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780429327261-68.
  • Hample, D. 2022. “China as a Cultural Locus: An Empirical Approach to Studying Interpersonal Arguing.” Paper Presented at the International Symposium on Argument and Culture, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou China, January.
  • Hample, D, and J. M. Dallinger. 1995. “A Lewinian Perspective on Taking Conflict Personally: Revision, Refinement, and Validation of the Instrument.” Communication Quarterly 43 (3): 297–319. doi:10.1080/01463379509369978.
  • Hample, D, and A. Irions. 2015. “Arguing to Display Identity.” Argumentation 29 (4): 389–416. doi:10.1007/s10503-015-9351-9.
  • Hample, D., F. Leal, and J. Suro. 2021. “Arguing in Mexico: How Uniquely Mexican is It?” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 50 (4): 389–408. doi:10.1080/17475759.2021.1910066.
  • Hample, D., A. S. Richards, and C. Skubisz. 2013. “Blurting.” Communication Monographs 80 (4): 503–532. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.830316.
  • Hample, D., B. Warner, and D. Young. 2009. “Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments.” Argumentation 23 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9107-x.
  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hofstede Insights. 2022. “Argentina.” https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/argentina
  • Infante, D. A, and A. S. Rancer. 1982. “A Conceptualization and Measure of Argumentativeness.” Journal of Personality Assessment 46 (1): 72–80. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13.
  • Infante, D. A, and C. J. Wigley. 1986. “Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure.” Communication Monographs 53 (1): 61–69. doi:10.1080/03637758609376126.
  • Khomenko, I., D. Hample, and C. Santibáñez. 2022. “Connections between age and interpersonal arguing in Ukraine”. Paper presented to the European Conference on Argumentation Rome, September.
  • Luna, Félix. 1983. Golpes militares y salidas electorales. Buenos Aires, Sudamericana.
  • Programa Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). 2017. “Informe Nacional sobre Desarrollo Humano 2017. Información para el desarrollo sostenible: Argentina y la Agenda 2030.” https://www.ar.undp.org/content/dam/argentina/Publications/Desarrollo%20Humano/PNUDArgent-04-19_Resumen.pdf
  • Programa Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). 2022. Argentina en breve. https://www.ar.undp.org/content/argentina/es/home/countryinfo.html
  • Romero, L. A. 2017. Breve historia contemporánea de la Argentina: 1916–2016. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Santibáñez, C, and D. Hample. 2015. “Orientations toward Interpersonal Arguing in Chile.” Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 25: 453–476. doi:10.1075/prag.25.3.06san.
  • Santibáñez, C., D. Hample, and J. Hample. 2021. “How Do Chilean Seniors Think about Arguing?” Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (2): 202–225. doi:10.1075/jaic.20002.san.
  • Shuster, K, and J. Meany. 2005. Speak out! Debate and Public Speaking in the Middle Grades. New York: International Debate Education Association.
  • Spector, E. 2018. Malversados: cómo la falacia se apoderó del debate político (y cómo volver a la lógica de la argumentación). Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
  • Waheed, M, and D. Hample. 2019. “Interpersonal Arguing in Malaysia and How It Compares to the U.S., India, and China.” China Media Research 15: 50–70.
  • Yoo, B., N. Donthu, and T. Lenartowicz. 2011. “Measuring Hofstede’s Five Dimensions of Cultural Values at the Individual Level: Development and Validation of CVSCALE.” Journal of International Consumer Marketing 23: 193–210. doi:10.1080/08961530.2011.578059.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.