Studying argumentation and education in South America: what has been advanced and what lies ahead

References

• Andriessen, J. 2007. Arguing to Learn. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer, 443–460. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. 2014. “Are Science Teachers Prepared to Promote Argumentation? A Case Study with Pre-Service Teachers in Bogotá City.” In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching 15 (1): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. 2015. “Uso de Conectores y Vocabulario Espontaneo en la Argumentación Escrita: aportes a la Alfabetización Científica.” Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de Las Ciencias 12 (3): 402–418. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2012.v9.i3.05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. 2016. “¿Cómo Formar Profesores de Ciencias Que Promuevan la Argumentación?” Lo Que Sugieren Avances Actuales de Investigación 20 (3): 399–432.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., and M. Debus. 2019. “When Do Women Speak? A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Gender in Legislative Debates.” Political Studies 67 (3): 576–596. doi:10.1177/00323217187893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baehr, J. 2016. Intellectual Virtues and Education: Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Battaly, H. 2022. Educating for Intellectual Pride and Ameliorating Servility in Contexts of Epistemic Injustice. Educational Philosophy and Theory 1–14. doi:10.1080/00131857.2022.2033212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chion, A., A. Couló, S. Erduran, M. Furman, P. Iglesia, and A. Adúriz-Bravo. 2005. “Estudios Sobre la Enseñanza de la Argumentación Científica Escolar.” Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, (Extra): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Colagrossi, M., D. Rossignoli, and M. A. Maggioni. 2020. “Does Democracy Cause Growth? A Meta-Analysis (of 2000 Regressions).” European Journal of Political Economy 61: 101824. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.101824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Chiaro, S., and S. Leitão. 2005. “O Papel Do Professor na Construção Discursiva da Argumentação em Sala de Aula.” Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 18 (3): 350–357. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722005000300009.
   Google Scholar
• de Macêdo, G. F. C., N. L. R. Roncancio, and S. Leitão. 2019. “El Papel de Los Reguladores Semióticos en la Construcción y Ejecución de un Diseño Instrucional Argumentativo.” Cogency 11 (1–2): 1–29. doi:10.32995/cogency.v11i1-2.321.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R. G. M. 2021. “Democracy in the Global South: Historical Elements and Contemporary Challenges.” Humania Del Sur 16 (31): 173–196.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3 < 287::AID-SCE1 > 3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S., André Bächtiger, Simone Chambers, Joshua Cohen, James N. Druckman, Andrea Felicetti, James S. Fishkin, et al. 2019. “The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 363 (6432): 1144–1146. doi:10.1126/science.aaw2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, T. 2000. “Rethinking Democracy and Education: Towards an Education of Deliberative Citizens.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 32 (2): 305–313. doi:10.1080/002202700182772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enslin, P., S. Pendlebury, and M. Tjiattas. 2001. “Deliberative Democracy, Diversity and the Challenges of Citizenship Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (1): 115–130. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortes, G., A. Larrain, and M. Gómez. 2020. “Design of a Teacher Training Program for the Development of Pedagogical Knowledge on Argumentation Content.” Cogency 12 (2): 169–205. doi:10.32995/cogency.v12i2.365.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C. 2011. “Elementos Para o Desenho de um Modelo de Debate Crítico na Escola.” In Argumentação na Escola: o Conhecimento em Construção, edited by S. Leitão, M. C. Damianovic, (Orgs), 225–249. Campinas, SP: Pontes
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C. 2019. “La Argumentación, Entre Pensamiento, Democracia y Aprendizaje.” Cogency 11 (1–2): 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. 2021. “Erosion or Decay? Conceptualizing Causes and Mechanisms of Democratic Regression.” Democratization 28 (1): 43–62. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harell, K. F. 2019. “Deliberative Decision-Making in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 77: 299–308. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henao, B. L, and M. S. Stipcich. 2008. “Educación en Ciencias y Argumentación: la Perspectiva de Toulmin Como Posible Respuesta a Las Demandas y Desafíos Contemporáneos Para la Enseñanza de Las Ciencias Experimentales.” Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de Las Ciencias 7 (1): 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hundleby, C. E. 2021. “Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Jara, C., M. Sánchez, and C. Cox. 2019. “Liderazgo Educativo y Formación Ciudadana: visiones y Prácticas de Los Actores.” Calidad en la Educación 51 (1): 350–381. doi:10.31619/caledu.n51.687.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H, and B. Kim. 2010. “Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Design Justifications and Guidelines.” Educational Technology Research and Development 58 (4): 439–457. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, R. T, and J. McCafferty-Wright. 2015. “Connecting an Open Classroom Climate to Social Movement Citizenship: A Study of 8th Graders in Europe Using IEA ICCS Data.” The Journal of Social Studies Research 39 (4): 255–269. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2015.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D, and D. Lerman. 2021. “Yes But: Developing a Critical Stance toward Evidence.” International Journal of Science Education 43 (7): 1036–1053. doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1897897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraín, A., C. Moreno, V. Grau, P. Freire, I. Salvat, P. López, and M. Silva. 2017. “Curriculum Materials Support Teachers in the Promotion of Argumentation in Science Teaching: A Case Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 522–537. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraín, A. 2017a. “Group-Work Discussions and Content Knowledge Gains: Argumentative Inner Speech as the Missing Link?” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 14: 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraín, A. 2017b. “Argumentation and Concept Development: The Role of Imagination.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 32 (4): 521–536. doi:10.1007/s10212-016-0316-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraín, A, and A. Haye. 2012. “The Role of Rhetoric in a Dialogical Approach to Thinking.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (2): 220–237. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00487.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., P. Freire, V. Grau, P. López, I. Salvat, M. Silva, and V. Gastellu. 2018. “The Effect of Peer‐Group Argumentative Dialogue on Delayed Gains in Scientific Content Knowledge.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2018 (162): 67–87. doi:10.1002/cad.20263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larrain, A., P. Freire, P. López, and V. Grau. 2019. “Counter-Arguing during Curriculum-Supported Peer Interaction Facilitates Middle-School Students’ Science Content Knowledge.” Cognition and Instruction 37 (4): 453–482. doi:10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraín, A., P. Freire, R. Moretti, M. Requena, and B. Sabat. 2015. “¿ La Universidad de Chile Promueve Las Habilidades de Argumentación Escrita: Un Estudio Exploratorio Comparativo de Estudiantes de Educación Universitaria y Educación Técnica.” Calidad en la Educación 43 (1): 201–228. doi:10.31619/caledu.n43.49.
   Google Scholar
• Larrain, Antonia, Vivian Singer, Katherine Strasser, Christine Howe, Patricia López, Jorge Pinochet, Camila Moran, Álvaro Sánchez, Maximiliano Silva, and Constanza Villavicencio. 2021. “Argumentation Skills Mediate the Effect of Peer Argumentation on Content Knowledge in Middle-School Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 113 (4): 736–753. doi:10.1037/edu0000619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. 2007. “Processos de Construção Do Conhecimento: A Argumentação em Foco.” Pró-posições 18 (3): 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. 2012. “O Trabalho Com Argumentação em Ambientes de Ensino-Aprendizagem: um Desafio Persistente.” Uni-pluriversidad 12 (3): 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. 2000. “The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building.” Human Development 43 (6): 332–360. doi:10.1159/000022695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. 2009. “Arguing Andlearning.” In Challenges and Strategies for Studying Human Development in Cultural Contexts, edited by C. Lightfoot and M. Lyra , 251–252. Rome: Firera.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S. 2018. “Latin America’s Shifting Politics: Democratic Survival and Weakness.” Journal of Democracy 29 (4): 102–113. doi:10.1353/jod.2018.0066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, N. V. 2013. “Deliberative Pedagogy in the Community: Connecting Deliberative Dialogue, Community Engagement, and Democratic Education.” Journal of Public Deliberation 9 (2): 1–16. doi:10.16997/jdd.172.
   Google Scholar
• Macchia, L, and A. C. Plagnol. 2019. “Life Satisfaction and Confidence in National Institutions: evidence from South America.” Applied Research in Quality of Life 14 (3): 721–736. doi:10.1007/s11482-018-9606-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, M, and R. Justi. 2019. “An Instrument for Analysing Students’ Argumentative Reasoning When Participating in Debates.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (6): 713–738. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1579005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, M, and F. Macagno. 2022. “An Analytical Instrument for Coding and Assessing Argumentative Dialogues in Science Teaching Contexts.” Science Education 106 (3): 573–609. doi:10.1002/sce.21708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., M. González‐Howard, R. Katsh‐Singer, and S. Loper. 2016. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Argumentation: Using Classroom Contexts to Assess High‐Quality PCK Rather than Pseudo Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (2): 261–290. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1748250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, L. S., J. G. Abril, and Á. G. Martínez. 2013. “La Argumentación en la Enseñanza de Las Ciencias.” Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos (Colombia) 9 (1): 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T. 2002. “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence.” In Research in Micropolitics: Political Decisión Making, Deliberation and Participation, edited by MX Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, and R. Shapiro, 151–193. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, D., C. Miranda, and L. Muñoz. 2021. “Latin American Political Culture and Citizenship Norms.” In Good Citizenship for the Next Generation, 89–105. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, C, and E. L. Piris. 2020. “Presentación: enseñanza de la Argumentación en Brasil y Argentina–Desafíos y Propuestas Prácticas.” Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación 20 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, K, and I. Sakki. 2022. “You Truly Are the Worst Kind of Racist!’: Argumentation and Polarization in Online Discussions around Gender and Radical‐Right Populism.” British Journal of Social Psychology. 1–17. doi:10.1111/bjso.12557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistori, M. H. C, and L. Banks-Leite. 2010. “Argumentação e Construção de Conhecimento: uma Abordagem Bakhtiniana.” Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos Do Discurso 4: 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, I., A. Segal, A. Lefstein, and A. Meshulam. 2018. “Teaching Controversial Issues in a Fragile Democracy: Defusing Deliberation in Israeli Primary Classrooms.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 50 (3): 387–409. doi:10.1080/00220272.2017.1397757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., M. Vrikki, and M. Evagorou. 2021. “Preparing Culturally Literate Citizens through Dialogue and Argumentation: rethinking Citizenship Education.” The Curriculum Journal 32 (3): 475–494. doi:10.1002/curj.95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbiano, C., and K. Scager. 2020. Cultivating Two Aspects of Intellectual Humility: Openness and Care. Teaching Philosophy 43 (1): 47–69. doi:10.5840/teachphil2020116117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldán, M. 2010. “End of Discussion: Violence, Participatory Democracy, and the Limits of Dissent in Colombia.” In Violent Democracies in Latin America, edited by D. M. Goldstein & E. D. Arias, 63–83. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, A. O. 1996. “From Exasperating Virtues to Civic Virtues.” American Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3): 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sá Ibraim, S., P. C. C. Mendonça, and R. Justi. 2013. “Contribuições Dos Esquemas Argumentativos de Walton Para Análise de Argumentos No Contexto Do Ensino de Ciências.” Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências 13 (1): 159–185.
   Google Scholar
• Sasseron, L. H. 2020. “Interações Discursivas e Argumentação em Sala de Aula: A Construção de Conclusões, Evidências e Raciocínios.” Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte) 22: 1–29. doi:10.1590/1983-21172020210135.
   Google Scholar
• Sasseron, L. H, and A. M. P. D. Carvalho. 2011. “Construindo Argumentação na Sala de Aula: A Presença Do Ciclo Argumentativo, os Indicadores de Alfabetização Científica e o Padrão de Toulmin.” Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 17 (1): 97–114. doi:10.1590/S1516-73132011000100007.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B, and M. J. Baker. 2016. Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somin, I. 2010. “Deliberative Democracy and Political Ignorance.” Critical Review 22 (2–3): 253–279. doi:10.1080/08913811.2010.508635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, R. 2010. “Living in a Jungle:’’ State Violence and Perceptions of Democracy in Buenos Aires.” In Violent Democracies in Latin America, edited by D. M. Goldstein and E. D. Arias, 133–160. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1515/9780822392033-007.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. 1996. Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. T. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar