90
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The distilled enthymeme and visual argument: ideological interpretations after digital editing

Pages 57-70 | Received 22 Jan 2023, Accepted 09 Aug 2023, Published online: 25 Aug 2023

References

  • Barnhurst, Kevin G., and Kelly Quinn. 2012. Political Visions: Visual Studies in Political Communication. 276–291. London: Sage Publications.
  • Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 2007. “Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3-4): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2007.11821666
  • Burke, Kenneth. 1968. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method, 42. Los Angeles: University of California Press
  • Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose, 19–29. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Carlson, Matt. 2009. “The Reality of a Fake Image News Norms, Photojournalistic Craft, and Brian Walski’s Fabricated Photograph.” Journalism Practice 3 (2): 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802681140
  • Cloud, Dana L. 2004. “To Veil the Threat of Terror’: Afghan Women and the Clash of Civilizations in the Imagery of the U.S. War on Terrorism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90 (3): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033563042000270726
  • Ehninger, Douglas.. 1968. On Systems of Rhetoric.Philosophy and Rhetoric, 131–144. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Finnegan, Cara A. 2001. “The Naturalistic Enthymeme and Visual Argument: Photographic Representation in the ‘Skull Controversy.” Argumentation and Advocacy 37 (3): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2001.11951665
  • Griffin, Michael. 2004. “Picturing America’s ‘War on Terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic Motifs as News Frames.” Journalism 5 (4): 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884904044201
  • Hariman, Robert. 2009. “Cultivating Compassion as a Way of Seeing.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 6 (2): 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420902867971
  • Kesseler, Frank. 2009. “What You Get Is What You See: Digital Images and the Claim on the Real.” In Digital Media: Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology, edited by Mariann van den Boomen, 187–197. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Lanham, Richard A. 2010. “The Electronic Word.” In The Electronic Word. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pfister, Damien Smith, and Carly S. Woods. 2016. “The Unnaturalistic Enthymeme: Figuration, Interpretation, and Critique after Digital Mediation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4): 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2016.11821872
  • Smith, Valerie J. 2007. “Aristotle’s Classical Enthymeme and the Visual Argumentation of the Twenty-First Century.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3-4): 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2007.11821667
  • Taylor, Bryan C. 1998. “The Bodies of August: Photographic Realism and Controversy at the National Air and Space Museum.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1 (3): 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2010.0070
  • Walker, Jeffrey. 1994. “The Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme.” College English 56 (1): 46–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/378216

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.