Toward a queering of debate

References

• Alexander, Bryant Keith. 2018. “Queer/Quare Theory: Worldmaking and Methodologies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 275–308. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Johnathan, and Jacqueline Rhodes. 2022. The Routledge Handbook of Queer Rhetoric. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulos, Charles, and Corrine Mitsuye Sugino. 2023. “Clash of the Uncivilized: An Alternative Approach to Policy Debate.” Contemporary Argumentation & Debate 38: 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, William. 1996. “An Introduction to the ‘Kritik.” The Rostrum.
   Google Scholar
• Berghahn, Daniela. 2012. “Queering the Family of Nation: Reassessing Fantasies of Purity, Celebrating Hybridity in Diasporic Cinema.” Transnational Cinemas 2 (2): 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1386/trac.2.2.129_1.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, Lauren, and Michael Warner. 1998. “Sex in Public.” Critical Inquiry 24 (2): 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1086/448884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britzman, Deborah. 1995. “Is There a Queer Pedagogy? Or, Stop Reading Straight.” Educational Theory 45 (2): 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1995.00151.x.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1993. “Critically Queer.” In Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex, 223–242. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Peter Odell. 2012. “The Procedural Queer: Substantive Due Process, Lawrence v. Texas, and Queer Rhetorical Futures.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 98 (2): 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2012.663923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathy Cohen, Cathy. 1997. “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 3 (4): 437–465. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-3-4-437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimp, Douglas. 2004. Melancholia and Moralism: Essays on AIDS and Queer Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Lauretis, Teresa. 1991. “Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities: An Introduction.” differences 3 (2): Iii–xviii. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-3-2-iii.
   Google Scholar
• Dehnert, Marco, Daniel C. Brouwer, and Lore/tta Le Master. 2022. “Anti-Normativity under Duress: An Intersectional Intervention in Queer Rhetoric.” In The Routledge Handbook of Queer Rhetoric, 319–327. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1982. “Ousia and Grammē: Note on a Note from Being and Time.” In Margins of Philosophy, translated by Alan Bass, 29–68. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1988. “ACTS: The Meaning of a Given Word.” In Memoires for Paul de Man, translated by Eduardo Cadava, 89–154. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1992. The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe. Translated by Pascale Anne Brault and Michael B. Naas. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1993. On the Name. Edited by Thomas Dutoit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1995. The Gift of Death. Translated by David Wills. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. Translated by Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 2017. The Death Penalty. Edited by Geoffrey Bennington and Marc Crépon, translated by Elizabeth Rottenberg. Vol. 2. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lee. 2022. Bad Education: Why Queer Theory Teaches Us Nothing. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• English, Eric, Stephen Llano, Gordon R. Mitchell, Catherine E. Morrison, John Rief, and Carly Woods. 2007. “Debate as a Weapon of Mass Destruction.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 4 (2): 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420701296646.
   Google Scholar
• Fawaz, Ramzi, and Shanté Paradigm Smalls. 2018. “Queers Read This! LGBTQ Literature Now.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 24 (2-3): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-4324765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeley, Austin J., and David Steinberg. 2008. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Matthias. 2011. “Deconstructive Aporias: Quasi-Transcendental and Normative.” Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4): 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9200-y.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, Ryan. 2007. “Dinner and Conversation at the Argumentative Table: Reconceptualizing Debate as an Argumentative Dialogue.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 28: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• González, Octavio, and Todd G. Nordgren. 2020. “Queer.” In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia. Oxford, EN: Oxford Research Encylopedias.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. 2005. In a Queer Time & Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Patrick, and Vijayendra Rao. 2015. Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. Michael, and Jessica A. Kurr. 2017. “Civic Education in Competitive Speech and Debate.” Argumentation and Advocacy 53 (2): 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2017.1304959.
   Google Scholar
• Jagose, Annamarie. 1996. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. Patrick. 2001. “Quare’ Studies, or, (Almost) Everything I Know about Queer Studies I Learned from My Grandmother.” Text and Performance Quarterly 21 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930128119.
   Google Scholar
• King, Claire Sisco, and Isaac West. 2014. “This Could Be the Place: Queer Acceptance in Lars and the Real Girl.” QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking 1 (3): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.1.3.0059.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Beau. 2023. “Indebted: The Compounding Politics of Black and Trans Argumentation in Intercollegiate Policy Debate.” Contemporary Argumentation & Debate 38: 39–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, Karl. 2023. “Please Don’t Use the Q-Word.” The Guardian, January 10. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/13/please-dont-use-the-q-word.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, Niall. 2004. A Derrida Dictionary. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, Christian O. 2010. “The Allred Initiative and Debate across the Curriculum: Reinventing the Tradition of Debate at North Carolina.” In Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century, edited by Allan D. Louden, 289–321. New York, NY: International Debate Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, Adrian. 1999. “Technical Materializations and the Politics of Radical Contingency.” Australian Feminist Studies 14 (29): 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649993362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, Sharon. 2005. “Queer Theory for Everyone: A Review Essay.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 31 (1): 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/432743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, Bryan J. 2011. “Queering Expertise: Counterpublics, Social Change, and the Corporeal Dilemmas of LGBTQ Equality.” Social Epistemology 25 (3): 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.578302.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 1998. “Pedagogical Possibilities for Argumentative Agency in Academic Debate.” Argumentation and Advocacy 35 (2): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1998.11951620.
   Google Scholar
• Morland, Iain, and Annabelle Willox. 2005. Queer Theory: Readers in Cultural Criticism. London, UK: MacMillan Education UK.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey, Megan Elizabeth. 2017. “The Incongruities of Queer Decorum: Exploring Gabriel García Román’s Queer Icons.” Women’s Studies in Communication 40 (2): 289–303.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, Star A. 1993. “A Defense of the Ethics of Contemporary Debate.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 26 (4): 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, José Esteban. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, Michael, and David Collings. 2004. “Introduction: Queer Romanticisms: Past, Present, and Future.” Érudit 36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Queer Nation. 1990. “Queers Read This.” http://www.qrd.org/qrd/misc/text/queers.read.this
   Google Scholar
• Politis, Vasilis. 2006. “Aporia and Searching in the Early Plato.” In Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays, edited by Lindsay Judson and Vassilis Karasmanis, 88–109. Oxford, EN: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, Martin Joseph. 2018. “Queers Read What Now?” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 24 (2-3): 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-4324837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirot, Kristan. 2014. A Question of Sex: Feminism, Rhetoric, and Differences That Matter. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, Jasbir K. 2005. “Queer Times, Queer Assemblages.” Social Text 23 (3-4): 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-23-3-4_84-85-121.
   Google Scholar
• Raffoul, François. 2008. “Derrida and the Ethics of the Im-Possible.” Research in Phenomenology 38 (2): 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916408X287003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, Erin J. 2004. “A Disunited Nation and a Legacy of Contradiction: Queer Nation’s Construction of Identity.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 28 (4): 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859904267232.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, Erin J. 2008. “An Inflammatory Fag and a Queer Form: Larry Kramer, Polemics, and Rhetorical Agency.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 94 (3): 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802210377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, Erin J. 2013. “An Appetite for Activism: The Lesbian Avengers and the Queer Politics of Visibility.” Women’s Studies in Communication 36 (2): 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Reid-Brinkley, Shanara. 2019. “Voice Dipped in Black.” In The Oxford Handbook of Voice Studies, 215–233. Oxford, EN: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, Nicholas. 2009. Aporetics: Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, Juliette. 2019. “A Former Slur is Reclaimed, And Listeners Have Mixed Feelings.” NPR. Published online August 21, 2019. https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2019/08/21/752330316/a-former-slur-is-reclaimed-and-listeners-have-mixed-feelings.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993a. “Foreward: T Times.” In Tendencies, xi–xvi. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993b. “Queer and Now.” In Tendencies. Durham: Duke University Press. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, John Ike. 2014. “Becoming Rather than Being’: Queer’s Double-Edged Discourse as Deconstructive Practice.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 38 (4): 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714553900.
   Google Scholar
• Slagle, R. Anthony. 1995. “In Defense of Queer Nation: From Identity Politics to a Politics of Difference.” Western Journal of Communication 59 (2): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319509374510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagle, R. Anthony. 1998. “(“Re)Conceptualizing the Role of Identity in Rhetoric: Queer Theory and Communication Studies.” PhD Diss., The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Elijah J. 2020. “The Kritik-Focused Model of Debate.” Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Argumentation 6: 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Solt, Roger. 1993. “Demystifying the Critique.” Health Care Policy 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Eric A. 2011. “Near Life, Queer Death: Overkill and Ontological Capture.” Social Text 29 (2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-1259461.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Eric A. 2021. Atmospheres of Violence: Structuring Antagonism and the Trans/Queer Ungovernable. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Nikki. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffe, Rachel, Meredith M. Bagley, Jason Zingsheim, Kimberlee Pérez, and Dustin Bradley Gholtz. 2015. “Queer Love.” In Queer Praxis: Questions for LGBTQ Worldmaking. New York, NY: Peter Lang. 215–229.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, Stacey. 2017. Teaching Queer: Radical Possibilities for Writing and Knowing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. 1993. Fear of a Queer Planet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, Isaac. 2013. “Queer Generosities.” Western Journal of Communication 77 (5): 538–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.784351.
   Google Scholar
• West, Isaac. 2018. “Queer Perspectives in Communication Studies.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 1–26. Oxford, EN: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, Isaac, Michaela Frischherz, Allison Panther, and Richard Brophy. 2013. “Queer Worldmaking in the ‘It Gets Better’ Campaign.” QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking 0 (1): 49–85. https://doi.org/10.1353/qed.2013.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, Robyn, and Elizabeth A. Wilson. 2015. “Introduction: Antinormativity’s Queer Conventions.” differences 26 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2880582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Kelly M. 2011. “Impossible Convictions: Convictions and Intentionality in Performance and Switch-Side Debate.” Contemporary Argumentation & Debate 32: 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, David. 2017. “Foreword: Speech and Debate as Civic Education: Challenges and Opportunities.” In Speech and Debate as Civic Education, edited by Jeremy D. Johnson, Michael J. Bergmaier, Jessica A. Kurr, and J. Michael Hogan, xi–xvi. University Park, PN: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar