Multimodal literacy and language testing: Visual and intersemiotic literacy indicators of reading comprehension texts

References

• Adami, E. (2016). Multimodality. In O. Garcìa, N. Flores & M. Spotti (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language and society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., Diamantopoulou, S., Jewitt, C., Kress, G., & Mavers, D. (2012). Using a social semiotic approach to multimodality: Researching learning in schools, museums and hospitals. National Centre for Research Methods, IOE.
   Google Scholar
• Brumberger, E. (2019). Past, present, future: Mapping the research in visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 38 (3), 165–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1575043
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C., & Choo, S. (2009). Introducing a multimodal framework in English language reading assessment. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009). INTI University College, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C., & Choo, S. (2010). Testing beyond words: Multimodal assessment in the English classroom. SingTeach, 27, 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dendrinos, B. (2009). Rationale and ideology of the KPG exams. https://rcel2.enl.uoa.gr/kpg/gr_kpgcorner_sep2009.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dendrinos, B., & Karavas, K. (2013). The KPG handbook: Performance descriptors and specifications. University of Athens, RCeL Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Holsanova, J. (2012). New methods for studying visual communication and multimodal integration. Visual Communication, 11(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412912446558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2014). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karatza, S. (2017). Analysing multimodal texts and test tasks for reading comprehension in the KPG exams in English. (Doctoral Dissertation). National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Karatza, S. (2019). Visual matters in language testing: Exploring intermodal meaning-making in reading comprehension source texts. In E. Karavas & B. Mitsikopoulou (Eds.), Developments in glocal language testing: The case of the Greek national foreign language exam system (pp. 127–154). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Karavas, E. & Mitsikopoulou, B. (Eds.). (2019). Developments in glocal language testing: The case of the Greek national foreign language exam system (pp. xxi–xxiv, 1–21). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996/2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, V. F. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 220–246). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19 (4), 367–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903361059
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal Literacy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsikopoulou, B., Karavas, K., & Lykou, C. (2019). The sociosemiotic language view underlying the design of the KPG exams. In E. Karavas & B. Mitsikopoulou (Eds.), Developments in glocal language testing: The case of the Greek national foreign language exam system (pp. 25–42). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Moodley, V. (2014). Quality and inequality in the assessment of visual literacy in Grade 12 examination papers across six South African languages. Language Matters, 45(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2013.907331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodley, V. (2015). Visual Literacy in High-Stakes Testing: Implications of Washback for Language Teachers. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 6 (4), 2054–2063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2015.0274
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., & Lim, V. L. (2014). Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis. In S. Norris & C. Maier (Eds.), Texts, images and interactions: A reader in multimodality (pp. 137–154). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Podlasov, A., & Chua, E. M. K. L. (2012). Interactive software for multimodal analysis. Visual Communication, 11 (3), 363–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212446414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Smith, B. A., & Podlasov, A. (2011). Multimodal analysis within an interactive software environment: Critical discourse perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.558687
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (2019). SFL and multimodal discourse analysis. In G. Thompson, W. Bowcher, L. Fontaine, & D. Schönthal (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics) (pp. 433–461). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Wignell, P., Wang, R., Chai, K., & Lange, R. (2019). Multimodality: A new discipline. In J. Wildfeuer, J. Pflaeging, J. Bateman, O. Seizov, & C-I. Tseng (Eds), Multimodality: Towards a new discipline. De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. (1994/2010). The language of displayed art (2nd ed.) Routledge. (1st ed., 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Royce, T. D. (2007). Inter-semiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. D. Royce and W. L. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–109). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sindoni, Maria Grazia , Adami, Elisabetta, Karatza, Styliani, Marenzi, Ivana, Moschini, Ilaria, Petroni, Sandra and Rocca, Marc (2019). CFRIDiL: Common Framework of Reference for Intercultural Digital Literacies. A comprehensive set of guidelines of proficiency and intercultural awareness in multimodal digital literacies. Available online https://www.eumade4ll.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/cfridil-framework-MG3_IM_4-compresso.pdf, DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20064.43520
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S., E. M. K. L., & O’ Halloran, K. (2012). Multimodal analysis image (teacher edition). Multimodal Analysis Company.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2007). Image/text relations and intersemiosis: towards multimodal text description for multiliteracies education. In L. Barbara & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress (33rd ISFC) PUCSP (pp. 1165–1205). Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2014). Multimodal reading comprehension: curriculum expectations and large-scale literacy testing practices. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 9(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.878968
   Google Scholar