Pedagogical Strategies to Enhance Learning in a Linear Algebra Course

REFERENCES

• Artigue, M. 1990. Ingénierie didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques. 9: 281–307. La Pensée Sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Balam, E. M. and D. M. Shannon. 2010. Student ratings of college teaching: A comparison of faculty and their students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 35(2): 209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beites, P. D. and A. P. Nicolás. 2013. Peer Instruction in Linear Algebra. In Proceedings of ICERI2013 Conference, Seville, pp. 6629–6639.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. C., P. S. DiPiazza, and S. L. Sauer. 2003. The future of electrical and computer engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education. 46(4): 467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y., W. Lin, S. Chang, and C. Liu. 2005. TIPS: a JiTT & PI pedagogical method with handheld computer as mediating tools. In Proc. of IEEE Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 844–845. Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, K., H. Zullo, J. Duncan, A. Stewart, and M. Snipes. 2013. Creating discussions with classroom voting in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 44(8): 1131–1142. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2012.742152
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, M. and G. Gibbs. 2001. The evaluation of the student evaluation of educational quality questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 26(1): 89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, E. F. 2002. Creating the CDIO SYLLABUS, a universal template for engineering education. 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16: 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorier, L. 2000. Recherches en Histoire et en Didactique des Mathématiques sur L’Algèbre Linéaire – Perspectives Théoriques sur leurs Interactions. Les Cahiers du Laboratoire Leibniz, 12, Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., A. Pereira, and J. M. Casas. 2010. The trajectories of study and research as products of didactical engineering: REI en ingeniería didáctica. In Proceedings of IEEE Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 5th Iberian Conference, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Gannod, G. C., J. E. Burge, and M. T. Helmick. 2008. Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE ‘08), Leipzig, Germany, pp. 777–786. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• González-Martín, A. S., I. Bloch, V. Durand-Guerrier, and M. Maschietto. 2014. Didactic situations and didactical engineering in university mathematics: Cases from the study of calculus and proof. Research in Mathematics Education. 16(2): 117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G. 2000. Three principles of learning and teaching mathematics. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the Teaching of Linear Algebra, pp. 177–189. Grenoble: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, A. and C. Rorres. 2010. Elementary Linear Algebra: Applications, Tenth Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. 1986. Principal component analysis and factor analysis. In Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics, pp. 115–128. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Konyalıoğlu A. C. 2009. An evaluation from students’ perspective on visualization approach used in linear algebra instructions. World Applied Science Journal. 6(8): 1046–1052.
   Google Scholar
• Lay, D. C. 2005. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Third Edition. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, S. J. 2010. Linear Algebra with Applications, Eighth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Love, B., A. Hodge, N. Grandgenett, and A. Swift. 2014. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 45(3): 317–324. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, A. 2009. Using peer instruction and I-clickers to enhance student participation in calculus. PRIMUS. 19(3): 219–231. doi:10.1080/10511970701643970
   Google Scholar
• Marion, A. L. C. 2007. Métodos de ensino para cursos de administração: uma análise da aplicabilidade e eficiência dos métodos. Master thesis. Programa de Estudos Pós-graduados em Administração de Empresas, Pontifícia universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1982. SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 52(1): 77–95. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. 1997. Peer Instruction a User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, G., E. Patterson, A. Gavrin, and W. Christian. 1999. Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning and Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pilzer, S. 2001. Peer instruction in physics and mathematics. PRIMUS. 11(2): 185–192. doi:10.1080/10511970108965987
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. 2005. Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. 3rd ed. Florence, KY: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., C. Bailey-Lee, B. Simon, Q. Cutts, and D. Zingaro. 2011. Experience report: A multi-classroom report on the value of peer instruction. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '11). Darmstadt, Germany, pp.138-142.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, R. 2010. Introdução à Álgebra Linear. July. http://www.mat.ufmg.br/~regi/.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, T. E. V. 2013. Evaluating the teaching effectiveness using multivariate statistics. Master thesis, Department of Teleinformatics Eng., Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, T. E. V., F. H. L. Vasconcelos, A. L. F. Almeida, J. C. M. Mota, and W. B. Andriola. 2013. A new approach to analyze the curriculum structure using the Students’ Evaluation of Education Quality instrument. In Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oklahoma City, USA, pp. 171–174.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, G. 2005. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Fourth Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Suppapittayaporn, D., N. Emarat, and K. Arayathanitkul. 2010. The effectiveness of peer instruction and structured inquiry on conceptual understanding of force and motion: a case study from Thailand. Research in Science & Technology Education. 28(1): 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira K. C. B., T. E. V. Silva, J. C. M. Mota, E. V. O. Teixeira, and N. C. Barroso. 2015. Peer instruction methodology for linear algebra subject: a case study in an engineering course. In Proc. of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira K. C. B. and J. C. M. Mota. 2016. Active methodologies for teaching linear algebra in an engineering course. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14, 837–843. doi: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7437230
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira K. C. B., T. E. V. Silva, J. C. M. Mota, E. V. O. Teixeira, and N. C. Barroso. 2018. Effectiveness of Peer Instruction in a linear algebra class within an engineering curriculum. In Press of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. and B. Thomas. 1991. Assessing teaching effectiveness: an Indian perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 16(3): 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. W. 1997. A note on interpretation of the paired-samples t test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 22: 349–360. doi:10.3102/10769986022003349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar