Utilizing a Blended + Flipped Learning Approach in a Calculus for Life and Management Sciences Classroom

References

• Adams, C. and A. Dove. 2018. Calculus students flipped out: The impact of flipped learning on calculus students’ achievement and perceptions of learning. PRIMUS. 28(6): 600–615. doi:10.1080/10511970.2017.1332701.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. and J. P. Brennan. 2015. An experiment in “flipped” teaching in freshman calculus. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 861–875. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1059916.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. and A. Sams. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, D., N. Ormes, and R. Swanson. 2015. Partially flipped linear algebra: A team–based approach. PRIMUS. 25(8): 641–654. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1047545.
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, J. 2011. How to Design and Teach a Hybrid Course: Achieving Student-Centered Learning Through Blended Classroom, Online, and Experiential Activities. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., A. D. Ritzhaupt, and P. Antonenko. 2019. Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 67(4): 793–824. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilli-Turner, E. 2015. Measuring learning outcomes and attitudes in a flipped introductory statistics course. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 833–846. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1046004.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, B. V. 2019. Flipping the precalculus classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 50(5): 728–746. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2018.1535098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, D. P. and M. Brady-Van den Bos. 2018. Too much, too soon? A critical investigation into factors that make flipped classrooms effective. Higher Education Research & Development. 37(4): 683–697. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1455642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eison, J. 2010. Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. https://www.cte.cornell.edu/documents/presentations/Active%20Learning%20-%20Creating%20Excitement%20in%20the%20Classroom%20-%20Handout.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(23): 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M., W. W. Wager, and L. J. Briggs. 1992. Principles of Instructional Design, Fourth edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. and H. Kanuka. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 7(2): 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. 2013. Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education, Third Edition, pp. 333–350. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, S., M. Beal, C. Lamb, D. Sonderegger, and D. Baumgartel. 2015. Flipping undergraduate finite mathematics: Findings and implications. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 814–832. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1046003.
   Google Scholar
• Heuett, J. W. 2017. Flipping the math classroom for non-math majors to enrich their learning experience. PRIMUS. 27(10): 889–907. doi:10.1080/10511970.2016.1256925.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. 2021. Nearly Half of Faculty Say Pandemic Changes to Teaching Are Here to Stay. Campus Technology, April.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper, S. R., R. H. Carver, M. A. Posner, and M. G. Everson. 2015. Four perspectives on flipping the statistics classroom: Changing pedagogy to enhance student-centered learning. PRIMUS. 25(8): 655–682. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1045573.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K., K. F. Hew, and G. Chen. 2017. Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review. 22: 50–73. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, G., T. Shuman, and K. Cook. 2013. Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education. 56(4): 430–435. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2249066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., P. N. Chase, and V. L. Walker. 2008. Supplemental practice and diagnostic assessment in an applied college algebra course. Journal of College Reading and Learning. 38(2): 7–30. doi:10.1080/10790195.2008.10850306.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. and N. Shulock. 2009. Student Progress Toward Degree Completion: Lessons from the Research Literature. Sacramento, CA: Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., J. M. Chang, and K. Suaray. 2016. Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 47(5): 653–673. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2015.1102979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. 2008. Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/ report/final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J. and C. Phillips. 2015. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education. 25: 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, L. 2015. Student perceptions of the flipped classroom in college algebra. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 782–791. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1054011.
   Google Scholar
• Overmyer, J. 2015. Research on flipping college algebra: Lessons learned and practical advice for flipping multiple sections. PRIMUS. 25(9-10): 792–802. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1045572.
   Google Scholar
• [28] Patterson, B., C. R. McBride, and J. L. Gieger. 2018. Flipped active learning in your mathematics classroom without videos. PRIMUS. 28(8): 742–753. doi:10.1080/10511970.2017.1423141.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G., C. D. Dziuban, and C. R. Graham. 2013. Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 2. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, L. B., J. McGivney-Burelle, and F. Xue. 2015. To flip or not to flip? An exploratory study comparing student performance in Calculus I. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 876–885. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1050617.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. E., L. E. Green, and D. L. Etheridge. 2016. A comparison between flipped and lecture-based instruction in the calculus classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 8(2): 252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnert, G., P. M. Sadler, S. M. Sadler, and D. M. Bressoud. 2015. The impact of instructor pedagogy on college calculus students’ attitude toward mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 46(3): 370–387. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2014.979898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Central Florida, Center for Distributed Learning (CDL). n.d. Blended Learning Toolkit. https://blended.online.ucf.edu/about/what-is-blended-learning/.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, D., R. Levy, and N. Lape. 2015. Why no difference? A controlled flipped classroom study for an introductory differential equations course. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 907–921. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1031307.
   Google Scholar
• Zack, L., J. Fuselier, A. Graham-Squire, R. Lamb, and K. O’Hara. 2015. Flipping freshman mathematics. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 803–813. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1031302.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegelmeier, L. B. and C. M. Topaz. 2015. Flipped calculus: A study of student performance and perceptions. PRIMUS. 25(9–10): 847–860. doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1031305.
   Google Scholar