Squeeze That Intellectual Juice! Encouraging Interactions in the Lecture Theater to Enhance Skill Development and Student Performance

References

• Anon. (2003), “If Humour Works, Don't Knock It,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(3), B14.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Benjamin S. (1956), Taxonomy of Education Objectives Handbook I, New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Caudill, Donald W. (2002), “A Model for Interpreting Written Comments on Student Evaluations of Marketing Courses,” Marketing Education Review, 12(1), 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Drea, John T., Carolyn Tripp, and Kathleen Stuenkel (2005), “An Assessment If the Effectiveness If an In-class Game in Marketing Students’ Perceptions and Learning Outcomes,” Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Farando, W. T. and I. Clarkell (2004), “Student Observations of Out-standing Teaching: Implications for Marketing Educators,” Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 271–81.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, B. and Anthony Grasha (1992), “Evaluation Guidelines,” The Teaching Professor, May, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. (1998), “Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods-A Six Thousand Student Study,” American Journal of Physics, 66, 64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J., J. Hong, L. ChanLin, S. Chang, and H. Chu (2005), “Creative Teachers and Creative Teaching Strategies,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., D. M. Johnson, and P. A. Golden (1996), “Enhanced Perceived Learning Within the Stimulated Marketing Environment,” Marketing Education Review, 6 (Summer), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2004), “Laughter Is the Best Tutor,” The Times Educational Supplement, 4583, A13.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Naresh K. (2002), “Integrating Technology in Marketing Education: Perspective for the New Millennium,” Marketing Education Review, 12(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Paladino, A. (2008) “Creating an Interactive and Responsive Teaching Environment to Inspire Learning,” Journal of Marketing Education, (August), 30(3), 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Pallab and Kausiki Mukhopadhyay (2001), “Using Information Technology for Active Learning in International Business Education,” Marketing Education Review, 11(3), 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Peltier, James W., Amanda Hay, and William Drago (2005), “The Reflective Learning Continuum: Reflecting on Reflection,” Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 250–263.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Abhijit and Bart Macchiette (2005), “Debating the Issues: A Tool for Augmenting Critical Thinking Skills of Marketing Students,” Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 264–276.
   Google Scholar
• Schräge, M. (2001), “Brave New World for Higher Education,” Technology Review, 14(October), 90–91.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, Lisa L., Thomas, L. Baker, and Vince Howe (2003), “Efficacy of Group Projects in Support Skill Acquisition,” Marketing Education Review, 13(1), 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, C. F. (2000), “Introducing Marketing Students to Business Intelligence Using Project-based Learning On the World-wide Web,” Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, R. (2004), “Business Ethics Teaching: Using Conversational Learning to Build an Effective Classroom Learning Environment,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkovick, C. (2004), “Ten Anchor Points for Teaching Principles of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 2, 109.
   Google Scholar
• Torok, S. (2004), “Is Humor an Appreciated Teaching Tool?” College Teaching, 52, 1, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Wendy and Stephen J. Ceci, (1997), “How Am I Doing? Problems With Student Rating of Instructors and Courses,” Change, September/October, 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Lauren K., Mary Jo Bitner, and Valerie Zeithaml (1994), “Paradigm Shifts in Business Education: Using Active Learning,” Journal of Marketing Education, 16(Fall), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M.R. (2005), “The Motivational Effects of the Classroom Environment in Facilitating Self-regulated Learning,” Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 25–40.
   Google Scholar