A Journal-Neutral Ratio for Marketing Faculty Scholarship Assessment

REFERENCES

• AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business). (2013). Business accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/standards/strategic_man/standard2.asp
   Google Scholar
• AACSB. (2014). Schools accredited in business. Retrieved from https://www.aacsb.net/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?Site=AACSB&WebCode=AccredSchlCountry
   Google Scholar
• ACBSP (Accreditation Council for Business School Programs). (2014). Accredited programs. Retrieved from http://www.acbsp.org/?page=accredited_members
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Suarez-Gonzalez, I., Lannelongue, G., & Joo, H. (2012). Scholarly impact revisited. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(2), 105–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2012). Counting citations in the field of business and management: Why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science. Scientometrics, 93, 553–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (2006). The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLOS Medicine, 3(6), e291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Business Deans Council. (2013). ABDC Journal Quality List 2013. Retrieved from http://lamp.infosys.deakin.edu.au/abdc/
   Google Scholar
• Bauerly, R. J., & Johnson, D. T. (2005). An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 313–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Werner, M. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. European Science Editing, 37(3), 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2006). Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact: Research articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabell, D. W. E. (2006). Cabell’s directory of publishing opportunities in marketing. Beaumont, TX: Cabell.
   Google Scholar
• Cabell, D. W. E. (2014). Cabell’s directory of publishing opportunities in marketing. Beaumont, TX: Cabell.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). Metrics of scholarly impact. Measurement, 10, 154–156.
   Google Scholar
• Campanario, J. M., Gonzalez, L., & Rodriguez, C. (2006). Structure of the impact factor of academic journals in the field of education and educational psychology: Citations from editorial board members. Scientometrics, 69, 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2013). Toward a more precise definition of self-citation. Scientometrics, 94, 777–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Change TO Elbeck, M., & Vander Schee, B. A. (2012). Using the RFM Model to Rank Doctoral Marketing Programs, American Marketing Association Summer Educators‘ Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL., August, 430–438.
   Google Scholar
• Clark T. (2003). Copied citations give impact factors a boost. Nature, 423, 373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto, F. M., Pesquita, C., Grego, T., & Veríssimo, P. (2009). Handling self-citations using Google Scholar. International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, 13(1). Retrieved from http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v13i1p2.html
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. (2012). The emergence of a citation cartel [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/04/10/emergence-of-a-citation-cartel/
   Google Scholar
• Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Manipulating Google Scholar citations and Google Scholar metrics: Simple, easy and tempting (EC3 Working Papers 6, 29). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0638
   Google Scholar
• Dingus, R., Mellema, H. N., & Langan, R. J. (2013). Who went where? Survey results. Conducted by the Doctoral Student Special Interest Group (DocSIG) of the American Marketing Association, American Marketing Association. Retrieved from http://www.bus.umich.edu/ConferenceFiles/AMA-Consortium-2013/WhoWentWhereReport2013Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. (2010). The Hirsch Index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 65–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einav, L., & Yariv, L. (2006). What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbeck, M., & Vander Schee, B. A. (2012). Using the RFM Model to Rank Doctoral Marketing Programs, American Marketing Association Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL., August, 430–438.
   Google Scholar
• Elbeck, M., & Vander Schee, B. A. (2014). Global benchmarking of marketing doctoral program faculty and institutions by subarea. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4). e123. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. A., & Kurdel, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A-W. (2007). Publish or Perish [Software]. Available at http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A-W. (2014, February 11). Journal quality list (52nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/jql.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, P., & Walton, Z. (2012). The consequences of predicting scientific impact in psychology using journal impact factors. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7(1), 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., & Sattler, H. (2011). Alphabetische Übersicht JQ 2.1. German Academic Association for Business Research (VHB). Retrieved from http://vhbonline.org/en/service/jourqual/vhb-jourqual-21-2011/
   Google Scholar
• Henning, V., & Gunn, W. (2012). Impact factor: Researchers should define the metrics that matter to them. The Guardian, September 6. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/sep/06/mendeley-altmetrics-open-access-publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeffel C. (1998). Journal impact factors [Letter]. Allergy, 53(12), 1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J. (2012, November 22). Scholars seek better ways to track impact online. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/As-Scholarship-Goes-Digital/130482/
   Google Scholar
• IWCSA. (2012). International workshop on contributorship and scholarly attribution. Harvard University and the Wellcome Trust. Retrieved from http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/attribution_workshop
   Google Scholar
• Jacso P. (2009). Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports. Online Information Review, 33(3), 603–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarwal, S. D., Brion, A. M., & King, M. L. (2009). Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and “Ranked Journals”: Blunt instruments or inspired metrics? Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 31(4), 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited: Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmulski, M. (2010). Hirsch-type index of international recognition. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 351–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, T., Shorter, J., & Huff, K. (2012). International differences in business journal acceptance rates across business disciplines. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1999–2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Properties of Hirsch-type indices: The case of library classification categories. Scientometrics, 79(2), 235–248. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0415-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manton, E. J., & English, D. E. (2007). The trend toward multiple authorship in business journals. Journal of Education for Business, 82(3), 164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. A., Herrera, M., López-Gijón, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). H-classics: Characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1971–1983.
   Google Scholar
• Moed, H. F. (2005a). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1088–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moed, H. F. (2005b). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moussa, S., & Touzani, M. (2010). Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder, C., Dalhaug, A., & Aandahl, G. (2013). Correlation between article download and citation figures for highly accessed articles from five open access oncology journals. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Notkins, A. L. (2008). Neutralizing the impact factor culture. Science, 322, 191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ruiz, O. (2009). The citation indexes and the quantification of knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 250–266.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, K. (2008). The misused impact factor. Science, 322(5899), 165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, T. D. (2011). A methodology for calculating prestige ranks of academic journals in communication: A more inclusive alternative to citation metrics. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 30(2), 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, M. D., & Lewis, B. R. (2010). Comprehensive analysis of marketing journal rankings. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. R. (2001). Improving reliability of judgmental forecasts. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 81–106). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & Braddock, R. (2007). International university ranking systems and the idea of university excellence. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R. L., & Stanton, A. D. (2009). Academic publishing and teaching effectiveness: An attitudinal study of AACSB accredited business school faculty. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13(2), 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson Reuters. (2014). Journal citation reports. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/journal-citation-reports/
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van, E., & Ding, Y. (2010). Weighted citation: An indicator of an article’s prestige. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1635–1643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26(5), 839–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson A. B. (2009). Comparing citations and downloads for individual articles at the Journal of Vision. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, B. (2009). Developing an overall ranking of 79 marketing journals: An introduction of PRINQUAL to marketing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(3), 160–174.
   Google Scholar
• Zare, R. N. (2012). Assessing Academic Researchers [Editorial]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51, 7338–7339. doi:10.1002/anie.201201011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. B., Lu, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14, 033033. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033033
   Google Scholar