How Marketing Academics View A-Level Journals: Psychological Insights Into Differences Between Published and Striving Authors

REFERENCES

• AMA Task Force on the Development of Marketing Thought. (1988). Developing, disseminating, and utilizing marketing knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 52(4), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R., Paul, P., Stewart, K. A., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2012). A new tool for identifying research standards and evaluating research performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(2), 194–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, S., Richardson, B., Earles, D., & Khogeer, Y. (2011). Marketing academics and practitioners: Towards togetherness. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 10(3), 291–304.
   Google Scholar
• Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Situational effects of advertising repetition: The moderating influence of motivation, ability, and opportunity to respond. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 432–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltramini, R., Schlacter, J. L., & Kelley, C. (1985). Marketing faculty promotion and tenure policies and practices. Journal of Marketing Education, 7(2), 74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. D., Brewer, V. L., & Hilton, C. (1990). Promoting research productivity in colleges of business. Journal of Education for Business, 66(1), 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Burneft, J. J., Amason, R.D., & Cunningham, P. (1989). What makes marketing academicians successful? An assessment of teaching, publishing, and service. Journal of Marketing Education, 11(3), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chandy, R. K. (2003). Research as innovation: Rewards, perils, and guideposts for research and reviews in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 351–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. E. (2001). The revival of projective techniques: Past, present and future perspectives. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 253–254.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. H., Abela, A. V., & Ambler, T. (2005). Organizational motivation, opportunity and ability to measure marketing performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(4), 241–259.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden, K. S., & Wiley, M. G. (1980). Causal attribution and behavioral response to failure. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(3), 353–358.
   Google Scholar
• Danneels, E., & Lilien, G. L. (1998). Doctoral programs in business-to-business marketing: Status and prospects. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 5(1–2), 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. (2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Jung, J., Wänke, M., & Alexopoulos, T. (2012). On the relations between distinct aspects of psychological distance: An ecological basis of construal-level theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1014–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 483–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T. M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2009). Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: Rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations. Global Edge Business Review, 3(3), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. J. (2011). On managerial relevance. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. O., O’Hara, B. S., & Cudd, M. (1994). Perceived causes, effects, and remedies for plateauing among marketing professors. Journal of Marketing Education, 16(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kyung, E. J., Menon, G., & Trope, Y. (2014). Construal level and temporal judgments of the past: The moderating role of knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, D. R., McAlister, L., & Staelin, R. (2011). Sophistication in research in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 155–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, D. J., Moorman, C., & Jaworski, B. J. (1991). Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlister, L. M. (2005). Toward insight and relevance. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(1), 131–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T. (1976). Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, V., Feick, L., & Murshed, F. (2008). Publish and prosper: The financial impact of publishing by marketing faculty. Marketing Science, 27(3), 430–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plouffe, C. R., Williams, B. C., & Wachner, T. (2008). Navigating difficult waters: Publishing trends and scholarship in sales research. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 28(1), 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., Juric, B., & Mankelow, G. (2003). Attitudes about work practices, time allocation, and publication output: Profiles of US marketing academics. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 218–230.
   Google Scholar
• Reibstein, D. J., Day, G., & Wind, J. (2009). Guest editorial: Is marketing academia losing its way? Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runyan, R. C., Finnegan, C., Gonzalez-Padron, T., & Line, N. D. (2013). What drives publishing productivity for pre-tenure marketing faculty: Insights using the lens of resource advantage theory. Marketing Education Review, 23(2), 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Sagristano, M. C., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Odds now, money later: Temporal distance effects on weighting risk and outcomes in positive bets: A temporal construal perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 364–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seggie, S. H., & Griffith, D. A. (2009). What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in the leading marketing journals. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, M. D., & Lewis, B. R. (2010). A comprehensive analysis of marketing journal rankings. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tangari, A. H., & Smith, R. J. (2012). How the temporal framing of energy savings influences consumer product evaluations and choice. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touzani, M., & Moussa, S. (2010). Ranking marketing journals using the search engine Google Scholar. Marketing Education Review, 20(3), 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2012). Prospect theory or construal level theory? Diminishing sensitivity vs. psychological distance in risky decisions. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, D. J., Wayland, J. P., & McDermott, D. R. (1992). An empirical investigation of research standards for marketing faculty at AACSB-accredited business schools. Journal of Marketing Education, 14(2), 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition. Oxford: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. A., Dinsmore, J. B., & Kellaris, J. J. (2013). How group loyalties shape ethical judgment and punishment preferences. Psychology & Marketing, 30(3), 203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar