Embracing Your Inner “Guide on the Side”: Using Neuroscience to Shift the Focus from Teaching to Learning

REFERENCES

• Alvarez, C. M. O., Taylor, K. A., & Rauseo, N. A. (2015). Creating thoughtful salespeople: Experiential learning to improve critical thinking skills in traditional and online sales education. Marketing Education Review, 25(3), 233–243. doi:10.1080/10528008.2015.1044859
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ardalan, K. (2013). The philosophical foundation of the lecture method of instruction and the case method of instruction: Implications for examinations. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 6(1), 1–8. doi:10.19030/cier.v6i1
   Google Scholar
• Ash, K. (2012, August 29). Educators evaluate “flipped classrooms.” Education Week, 32, 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., Sandora, C., Kucan, L., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the author: A Yearlong classroom implementation to engage students with text. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 385–414. doi:10.1086/461835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. S., Daughtrey, C. L., & Lewis, J. S. (2014). The importance of course design on classroom performance of marketing students. Marketing Education Review, 24(3), 213–226. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008240303
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233–246. doi:10.1111/bjep.1992.62.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1999). Yin and yang cognitive motivational processes operating in multimedia learning environments. In J.J.G. Van Merrienboer (Ed.), Cognition and multimedia design (pp. 1–38). Herleen, Netherlands: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Crews, T., & Butterfield, J. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38–47. doi:10.5539/hes.v4n3p38
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31, 105–113. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Leonardi, B. C. (2007). Tips for facilitating learning: The lecture deserves some respect. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(4), 154–161. doi:10.3928/00220124-20070701-09
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubinsky, J. M. (2010). Neuroscience education for Prekindergarten-12 teachers. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 8057–8060. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2322-10.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, J. M., Roehrig, G., & Varma, S. (2013). Infusing neuroscience into teacher professional development. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 317–329. doi:10.3102/0013189X13499403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory (H.A. Ruger and C.E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York, NY: Teachers College at Columbia University. (Original work published 1885).
   Google Scholar
• Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 463–477. doi:10.3102/00346543064003463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, R. D. (2008). White matter in learning, cognition and psychiatric disorders. Trends in Neuroscience, 31(7), 361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2013). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings, 8(2), 138–145.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111, 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garver, M. S., & Roberts, B. A. (2013). Flipping & clicking your way to higher-order learning. Marketing Education Review, 23(1), 17–22. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008230103
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component levels of the effects of spacing on recall and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 7, 95–112. doi:10.3758/BF03197590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T. (2015). Flipped classrooms: An agenda for innovative marketing education in the digital era. Marketing Education Review, 25(3), 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. (2004). Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory & Cognition, 32, 336–350. doi:10.3758/BF03196863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. (2015). Improvements from the flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartel, G. (2010). Does language matter in multimedia learning? Personalization principle revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 615–624. doi:10.1037/a0019345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Turner, S. A., & Perez-Quinones, M. A. (2009). Requirements for electronic note taking systems: A field study of note taking in university classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 14, 255–283. doi:10.1007/s10639-009-9086-z
   Google Scholar
• Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. (2007). Using prior knowledge to minimize interference when learning large amounts of information. Memory & Cognition, 35, 124–137. doi:10.3758/BF03195949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, D., Davis, T. B., & Glover, J. A. (1990). Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 366–371. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 44(1), 87–112. doi:10.1037/h0084237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Dow, G., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806–812. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 389–395. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., … Mumper, R. J. (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), Article 196, 196–198.10.5688/ajpe779196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.
   Google Scholar
• Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597–599. doi:10.3928/01484834-20130919-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000a). A learner-centred approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000b). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724–733. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P. E., Gruneberg, M. M., Sykes, R. N., & Merrick, A. (1981). Football knowledge and the acquisition of new results. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 479–483. doi:10.1111/bjop.1981.72.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Costanza, D. P., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., & Fleishman, E. A. (1994). Influence of abilities on performance during practice: Effects of massed and distributed practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 134–144. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncy, J. A. (2014). Blogging for reflection: The use of online journals to engage students in reflective learning. Management Education Review, 24(2), 101.114.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, Z., Westerberg, H., & Klingberg, T. (2004). Maturation of white matter is associated with the development of cognitive functions during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1227–1233. doi:10.1162/0898929041920441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, Outstanding Contributions Series, 45, 255–287. doi:10.1037/h0084295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pale, P. (2013). Intrinsic deficiencies of lectures as a teaching method. Collegium Antropologicum, 37(2), 551–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. R., & Trainor, J. E. (2014). Millennial students and the flipped classroom. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 5(1), 102–112.
   Google Scholar
• Polegato, R. (2014). The eco-sculpture assignment: Using art to scaffold metacognition. Marketing Education Review, 24(1), 53–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 70–80. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roher, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of over-learning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209–1224. doi:10.1002/acp.1266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronchetti, M. (2010). Using video lectures to make teaching more interactive. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Carlson, R. A., & Gilmore, R. O. (2001). Acquisition of intellectual and perceptual motor skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 453–470. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (1988). Controlling variable: A meta-analysis of training studies. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 405–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S., Morrison, G., & Lowther, D. (2010). Education technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Saber, J. (2010). Summarize, synthesize, and space: The relative effects of organization, repetition, and spacing on student performance. Marketing Education Review, 20(1), 83–92. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008200112
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and processes. In P. Alexander, & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245–263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Slameck, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). Delineation of a phenomenon. Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning: A conceptual framework for teachers. Holt, New York: Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Rothkopf, E. Z. (1984). Contextual enrichment and distribution of practice in the classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 341–358. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0103_4
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychological Review, 99(2), 195–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steed, A. (2012). The flipped classroom. Teaching Business & Economics, 16(3), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344–64. doi:10.1177/002221949803100404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of advanced organizer studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51(7), 194–199.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
   Google Scholar
• Stutts, K. J., Beverly, M. M., & Kelley, S. F. (2013). Evaluation of note taking method on academic performance in undergraduate animal science courses. NACTA (North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture) Journal, 57(3), 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D., Hagen, A. S., & Meyer, D. K. (1996). How research on learning strengthens instruction. In R.J. Menges, & M. Weimer (Eds.), Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice (pp. 257–288). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Teichert, J. (November 9, 2010). Lest they forget. Learning and Teaching, Brigham Young University. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.byui.edu/learning-and-teaching/articles-and-videos/articles-and-videos/lest-they-forget
   Google Scholar
• Valcke, M. (2002). Cognitive load: Updating the theory? Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 147–154. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00022-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. Sohn-Steiner, S. Scubner, & E. Soubermas (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, M., & Mazik, H. K. (2015). Art isn’t easy… but it makes learning easier: Using art to improve cognition. Marketing Education Review, 25(1), 39–45. doi:10.1080/10528008.2015.999602
   Google Scholar
• Woloshyn, V. E., Paivio, A., & Pressley, M. (1994). Use of elaborative interrogation to help students acquire information consistent with prior knowledge and information inconsistent with prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 79–89. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience/Review, 15, 528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar