Testing the Effectiveness of a Marketing Simulation to Improve Course Performance

References

• Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2003). Is time pressure all bad? Measuring the relationship between free time availability and student performance and perceptions. Marketing Education Review, 13(2), 21–32. doi:10.1080/10528008.2003.11488825
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. H., & Lawton, L. (1992). The relationship between financial performance and other measures of learning on a simulation exercise. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 326–340. doi:10.1177/1046878192233005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. H., & Lawton, L. (2009). Business simulations and cognitive learning: Developments, desires, and future directions. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Batko, M. (2016). Business management simulations: A detailed industry analysis as well as recommendations for the future. International Journal of Serious Games, 3(2), 47–65. doi:10.17083/ijsg.v3i2.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84(4), 486–506. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M., Devitt, A., Lamest, M., & Pearson, S. G. (2015). Winner and losers in gamification? The role of gamification in third level learning and higher order processing. Social Science Research Network. (Elsevier). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2587057
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, R., & Vos, L. (2010). Marketing simulation games: Student and lecturer perspectives. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(7), 882–897. doi:10.1108/02634501011086472
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, R., & Vos, L. (2013). Effects of participation in a simulation game on marketing students’ numeracy and financial skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(3), 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, B. W., Burson, T. E., & Rudd, D. V. (2006). Addressing current research gaps and directions in educational marketing simulations. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 9, 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, E. T., & Wolfe, D. E. (1979). An exploratory study of student characteristics and educational processes in programmatic experiential learning. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 6, 239–242.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte, E. R. (2016). Creating value in marketing and business simulations: An author’s viewpoint. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(2), 119–129. doi:10.1177/0273475316649741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadotte, E. R., & MacGuire, C. (2013). A pedagogy to enhance the value of simulations in the classroom. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 21(2), 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, H. J., & Allen, J. G. (1970). Ego identity status, adjustment, and academic achievement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34(2), 288. doi:10.1037/h0029044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, D., & Brown, F. W. (2000). Using a business simulation to teach applied skills: The benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 330–336. doi:10.1108/03090590010373316
   Google Scholar
• Ertz, M. (2016). Objective: Winning or learning? A study of marketing simulation games. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(2), 13. doi:10.5539/ijms.v8n2p13
   Google Scholar
• Faria, A. J. (1998). Business simulation games: Current usage levels—An update. Simulation & Gaming, 29(3), 295–308. doi:10.1177/1046878198293002
   Google Scholar
• Faria, A. J. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: A brief history. Simulation & Gaming, 32(1), 97–110. doi:10.1177/104687810103200108
   Google Scholar
• Faria, A. J., & Wellington, W. J. (2004). A survey of simulation game users, former-users, and never-users. Simulation & Gaming, 35(2), 178–207. doi:10.1177/1046878104263543
   Google Scholar
• Faria, A. J., & Whiteley, T. R. (1990). An empirical evaluation of the pedagogical value of playing a simulation game in a principles of marketing course. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 17, 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. M. (2001). The contribution of faith and ego strength to the prediction of GPA among high school students ( Ph.D. Dissertation), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, G., & Sun, Q. (2009). Using simulations in the undergraduate marketing capstone case course. Marketing Education Review, 19(1), 7–16. doi:10.1080/10528008.2009.11489054
   Google Scholar
• Garber, L. L., Hyatt, E. M., Boya, Ü. Ö., & Ausherman, B. (2012). The association between learning and learning style in instructional marketing games. Marketing Education Review, 22(2), 167–184. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008220206
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. W. (1990). What is experiential learning. Guide to Business Gaming and Experiential Learning, 9, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Glomnes, S. J. (2014). Antecedents of game performance. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 31, 229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, L. (1990). Effort and reward in college: A replication of some puzzling findings. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 151.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., Greenberg, B. A., & Nicholls, J. (2007). Teaching experiential learning: Adoption of an innovative course in an MBA marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(1), 25–33. doi:10.1177/0273475306297380
   Google Scholar
• Mottner, S. (2009). Experimenting with team norms in a marketing simulation. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 15, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Academic performance of college students: Influence of time spent studying and working. Journal of Education for Business, 81(3), 151–159. doi:10.3200/JOEB.81.3.151-159
   Google Scholar
• Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2010). Performance of college students: Impact of study time and study habits. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 229–238. doi:10.1080/08832320903449550
   Google Scholar
• Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to “make the grade”? Sociology of Education, 73(1), 19–38. doi:10.2307/2673197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353. doi:10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., & Gold, J. A. (2011). Competitive orientations and the Type A behavior pattern. Psychology, 2(05), 411. doi:10.4236/psych.2011.25064
   Google Scholar
• Tompson, G. H., & Dass, P. (2000). Improving students’ self-efficacy in strategic management: The relative impact of cases and simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 22–41. doi:10.1177/104687810003100102
   Google Scholar
• Tompson, G. H., & Tompson, H. B. (1995). Using computer simulations for group projects in business school education. Journal of Education for Business, 71(2), 97–101. doi:10.1080/08832323.1995.10116767
   Google Scholar
• Vaidyanathan, R., & Rochford, L. (1998). An exploratory investigation of computer simulations, student preferences, and performance. Journal of Education for Business, 73(3), 144–149. doi:10.1080/08832329809603819
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, M. C. (2006). An examination of competitiveness and personality in relation to academic and sales performance ( Ph.D. Dissertation), University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4283/
   Google Scholar
• Washbush, J., & Gosenpud, J. (1994). Simulation performance and learning revisited. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 21, 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, W. J., & Faria, A. J. (1991). An investigation of the relationship between simulation play, performance level and recency of play on exam scores. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 18, 111–114.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, W. J., & Faria, A. J. (1995). Are good simulation performers consistently good? Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 22, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, W. J., & Faria, A. J. (1996). The use of simulation games in marketing classes: Is simulation performance due to luck or skill? Journal of Marketing Education, 18(2), 50–61. doi:10.1177/027347539601800206
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, W. J., & Hutchinson, D. (2014). Marketing simulation game decision making experience and its impact on indecisiveness among introductory marketing students. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 36, 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. (1973). The comparative learning effects of a management game vs. casework in the teaching of business policy. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.1973.4981344
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28(4), 360–376. doi:10.1177/1046878197284003
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., & Guth, G. R. (1975). The case approach versus gaming in the teaching of business policy: An experimental evaluation. The Journal of Business, 48(3), 349–364. doi:10.1086/jb.1975.48.issue-3
   Google Scholar