Modeling diameter distributions of Gmelina arborea plantation in Omo Forest Reserve, Nigeria with Johnson’s S_B

References

• Adetogun, A. C., & Omole, A. O. (2007). Treatment of Gmelina arborea with CCA using thermal process. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 19, 186–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi, S. (2013). Diameter distribution for Gmelina arborea plantations in Ukpon River Forest Reserve, Cross River State, Nigeria. AFRREV STECH, 2(1), 64–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ajayi, S., Ogar, N. E., & Anyaorah, C. N. (2004). A mathematical programming approach to sustainable management of Gmelina arborea (Roxb) plantations in a Nigerian rain forest. International Journal of Education, 2(1–2), 146–157.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., & Dell, T. R. (1973). Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. Forest Sciences, 19, 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart, H. E., & Tomé, M. (2012). Modeling forest trees and stands (2nd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chima, U. D., Ola-Adams, B. A., Adedire, M. O., & Oyelowo, O. J. (2009). Impact of land use changes on soil quality of a biosphere reserve in southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, 1(1), 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• DeLiocourt, F. (1898). De l’amenagement des Sapiniers. Bul Social Forest Franche-Comptéet Belfort, 4, 396–409.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, J. A. (1983). Handbook of energy crops: Gmelina arborea Roxb. Retrieved from https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Gmelina_arborea.html
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, A. R., Karimi, B., Payam, H., & Derakhshan, O. K. (2011). Investigation of the structure and distribution diameter classes models in beech forests of northern Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(10), 2157–2165.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, T. F., Marques, C. P., & Parresol, B. R. (2009). Describing maritime pine diameter distributions with Johnson’s SB distribution using a new all-parameter recovery approach. Forest Sciences, 55, 367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgoso, J. J., Rojo, A., Camara-Obregon, A., & Dieguez-Aranda, U. (2012). A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull, Johnson’s SB and beta functions to Pinus pinaster, Pinus radiate and Pinus sylvestris stands in northwest Spain. Forest Systems, 21(3), 446–459. doi:10.5424/fs/2012213-02736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgoso-Varela, J. J., & Rojo-Alboreca, A. (2014). Short communication: A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson’s SB functions to pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) and birch (Betula pubescens) stands in northwest Spain. Forest Systems, 23(3), 500– 505. doi:10.5424/fs/2014233-04939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgoso-Varela, J. J., Rojo-Alboreca, A., Afif-Khouri, E., & Barrio-Anta, M. (2008). Modelling diameter distributions of birch (Betula alba L.) and pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) stands in northwest Spain with the beta distribution. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas Y Recursos Forestales, 17(3), 271–281. doi:10.5424/srf/2008173-01041
   Google Scholar
• Hafley, W. L., & Schreuder, H. T. (1977). A useful bivariate distribution for describing stand structure of tree heights and diameters. Biometrics, 33, 471–478. doi:10.2307/2529361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L. (1949). Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika, 36, 149–176. doi:10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoebel, B. R., & Burkhart, H. E. (1991). A bivariate distribution approach to modeling forest diameter distributions at two points in time. Biometrics, 47, 241–253. doi:10.2307/2532509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loetsch, F., Zöhrer, F., & Haller, K. E. (1973). Forest inventory 2. Munich, Germany: BLV.
   Google Scholar
• Maltamo, M., Puumalainen, J., & Päivinen, R. (1995). Comparison of beta and Weibull functions for modeling basal area diameter distribution in stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies, Scan. Journal Forest Researcher, 10, 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateus, A., & Tomé, M. (2011). Modelling the diameter distribution of Eucalyptus plantations with Johnson’s S B probability density function: Parameters recovery from a compatible system of equations to predict stand variables. Annals of Forest Science, 68, 325–335. doi:10.1007/s13595-011-0037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. C. (1964). Diameter distribution and growth of loblolly pine. Forest Sciences, 10, 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ogana, F. N., & Gorgoso-Varela, J. J. (2015). Comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull distribution to the natural stand of Oluwa Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment, 7(2), 82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ogana, F. N., Osho, J. S. A., & Gorgoso-Varela, J. J. (2015). Comparison of beta, gamma and Weibull distributions for characterizing tree diameter in Oluwa Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 5(4), 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Palahí, M., Pukkala, T., Blasco, E., & Trasobares, A. (2007). Comparison of beta, Johnson’s SB, Weibull and truncated Weibull functions for modeling the diameter distribution of forest stands in Catalonia (north-east of Spain). European Journal Forest Researcher, 126, 563–571. doi:10.1007/s10342-007-0177-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parresol, B. R. (2003). Recovering parameters of Johnson’s SB distribution (Research Paper SRS-31). Retrieved from http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/5455
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (2003). SAS online doc 9.1.3. Cary, NC: Author. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Siekierski, K. (1992). Comparison and evaluation of three methods of estimation of the Johnson SB distribution. Biometrical Journal, 34, 879–895. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. L., & Cao, Q. V. (2006). A diameter distribution model for even-aged beech in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management, 231, 218–225. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Kevin, C. P., & Chuanmin, L. (2003). A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson’s SB distributions to mixed spruce-fir stands in north-eastern North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. Journal Canadien de la Recherche Forestiere, 33, 1340–1347. doi:10.1139/x03-054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L and Zhou, X. (2010). Diameter distribution of trees in natural stands managed on polycyclic cutting system. Forestry Studies in China, 12(1), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Zhous, B., & McTague, J. P. (1996). Comparison and evaluation of five methods of estimation of the Johnson system parameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. Journal Canadien de la Recherche Forestiere, 26, 928–935. doi:10.1139/x26-102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar