708
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Why Did Portugal Enter PISA? Divergent Political Views, the National Agenda and the OECD Push

References

  • Acosta, F. (2020). Who is setting the agenda? OECD, PISA, and educational governance in the countries of the southern cone. European Education, 52(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2020.1725390
  • Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2017). Why do countries participate in PISA? Understanding the role of international large-scale assessments in global educational policy. In A. Verger, A. M. Novellin, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp. 97–118). Bloomsbury.
  • Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2019). Is it worth it? Rationales for (non)participation in international large-scale learning assessments. UNESCO.
  • Addey, C., Sellar, S., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2017). The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1301399
  • Afonso, A. J. (1998). Políticas educativas e avaliação educacional (Educational policies and educational assessment). Instituto de Educação e Psicologia da Universidade do Minho.
  • Afonso, N., & Costa, E. (2009). A influência do PISA na decisão política em Portugal: O caso das políticas educativas do XVII governo constitucional português (The influence of PISA on the political decision in Portugal: The case of the educational policies of the XVII Portuguese constitutional government). Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação, 10, 53–64.
  • Anagnostopoulos, D., Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2016). Argumentation in educational policy disputes: Competing visions of quality and equity. Theory into Practice, 55(4), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208071
  • Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
  • Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2014). Comparative education, the “new paradigm” and policy borrowing: Constructing knowledge for educational reform. Comparative Education, 50(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.826497
  • Bart, D. (2022). Research discourse in the programme for international student assessment: A critical perspective. European Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221127758
  • Benveniste, L. A. (2002). The political structuration of assessment: Negotiating state power and legitimacy. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1086/324051
  • Białecki, I., Jakubowski, M., & Wiśniewski, J. (2017). Education policy in Poland: The impact of PISA (and other international studies). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12216
  • Bieber, T., & Martens, K. (2011). The OECD PISA study as a soft power in education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01462.x
  • Bonal, J., & Tarabini, A. (2013). The role of PISA in shaping hegemonic educational discourses, policies and practices: The case of Spain. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.335
  • Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalization and economic development. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093960110101
  • Candido, H. H. D., Granskog, A., & Tung, L. C. (2020). Fabricating education through PISA? An analysis of the distinct participation of China in PISA. European Education, 52(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2020.1759097
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2009). Governando a educação pelo espelho do perito: Uma análise do PISA como instrumento de regulação (Governing education with the expert mirror: An analysis of PISA as a regulation tool). Educação & Sociedade, 30(109), 1009–1036. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302009000400005
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.172
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2016). Intensificação e sofisticação dos processos da regulação transnacional em educação: O caso do Programa Internacional de Avaliação de Estudantes (Intensification and sophistication of transnational governance in education: An analysis of OECD’s PISA). Educação & Sociedade, 37(136), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302016166669
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2017). Fazendo conhecimento comparado para a política: Notas de um estudo sobre a construção da ecologia do PISA (Comparative knowledge for policy: A study on the construction of PISA ecology). Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 51, 99–117.
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2018). International assessments and its expertise fabricating expert knowledge for policy. In S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the numbers and the making of society: The expertise of international assessments (pp. 88–105). Taylor & Francis.
  • Carvalho, L. M., & Costa, E. (2014). Seeing education with one’s own eyes and through the PISA lenses: Considerations of the reception of PISA in European countries. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871449
  • Carvalho, L. M., Afonso, N., & Costa, E. (2011). O PISA em seis contextos europeus: Difusão e indigenação (PISA in six European contexts: Diffusion and indigenization). In L. M. Carvalho (Ed.), O espelho do perito (pp. 127–151). Fundação Manuel Leão.
  • Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Gonçalves, C. (2017). Fifteen years looking at the mirror: On the presence of PISA in education policy processes (Portugal, 2000–2016). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12210
  • Correia, J. A. (1999). As ideologias educativas em Portugal nos últimos 25 anos (Educational ideologies in Portugal in the last 25 years). Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 12(1), 81–110.
  • Correia, J. A., Stoleroff, A. D., & Stoer, S. R. (2012). A ideologia da modernização no sistema educativo em Portugal (The ideology of modernization in the education system in Portugal). Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 37, 169–193.
  • Cowen, R. (1996). Last past the post: Comparative education, modernity, and perhaps post-modernity. Comparative Education, 32(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069628812
  • DeBoer, J. (2015). Why the fireworks? Theoretical perspectives on the explosion in international assessments. In A. Wiseman, (Ed.), The impact of international achievement studies on national education policymaking (pp. 297–330). Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Domínguez, M., Vieira, M.-J., & Vidal, J. (2012). The impact of the Programme for International Student Assessment on academic journals. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 19(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.659175
  • Eivers, E. (2010). PISA: Issues in implementation and interpretation. The Irish Journal of Education, 38, 94–118.
  • El Masri, Y. H., Baird, J.-A., & Graesser, A. (2016). Language effects in international testing: The case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1218323
  • Engel, L. C. (2015). Steering the national: Exploring the education policy uses of PISA in Spain. European Education, 47(2), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2015.1033913
  • Fernandes, D. (2014). Avaliações externas e melhoria das aprendizagens dos alunos: Questões críticas de uma relação (im)possível (External evaluations and improvement of students’ learning: critical issues of an (im)possible relationship). In D. Justino, M. Miguéns, & A. L. Ferreira (Eds.), Avaliação externa e qualidade das aprendizagens (pp. 21–49). Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  • Fernandes, D., Neves, C., Tinoca, L., Viseu, S., & Henriques, S. (2019). Políticas educativas e desempenho de Portugal no PISA (Public Policies in Education and Portugal’s Performance in PISA). Instituto de Educação.
  • Green, J. L., & Chian, M. M. (2018). Triangulation. In B. Frey (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (pp. 1718–1720). SAGE.
  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
  • Hajisoteriou, C., & Neophytou, L. (2020). The role of the OECD in the development of global policies for migrant education. Education Inquiry, 13(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1863632
  • Hernández-Torrano, D., & Courtney, M. G. R. (2021). Modern international large-scale assessment in education: An integrative review and mapping of the literature. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 9(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00109-1
  • Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J.-A. (2018). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
  • Jacobsen, R., & Young, T. V. (2013). The new politics of accountability: Research in retrospect and prospect. Educational Policy, 27(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813478164
  • Jarke, J., & Breiter, A. (2019). Editorial: The datafication of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1573833
  • Jerrim, J. (2021). PISA 2018 in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales: Is the data really representative of all four corners of the UK? Review of Education, 9(3), 1–41.
  • Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/648471
  • Kijima, R., & Lipscy, P. Y. (2023). The politics of international testing. The Review of International Organizations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09494-4
  • Liesner, A. (2012). Peer pressure: Comments on the European educational reform. Policy Futures in Education, 10(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.3.297
  • Lockheed, M., Prokic-Bruer, T., A. & Shadrova, (2015). The experience of middle-income countries participating in PISA 2000-2015. World Bank and OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246195-en
  • Magalhães, A. M., & Stoer, S. R. (1998). Orgulhosamente filhos de Rousseau (Proudly sons of Rousseau). Profedições.
  • Maroy, C. (2009). Convergences and hybridization of educational policies around “post‐bureaucratic” models of regulation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920801903472
  • Mero-Jaffe, I. (2011). Is that what I said?” Interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000304
  • Meyer, H.-D. (2014). Imagining PISA’s policy futures: A postscript and some extensions to the open letter to Andreas Schleicher. Policy Futures in Education, 12(7), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.7.883
  • Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global education governance. Symposium Books.
  • Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
  • Nardi, E. (2008). Cultural biases: A non‐anglophone perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802417467
  • Niemann, D. (2016). Germany: The intersection of international achievement testing and educational policy development. In L. Volante (Ed.), The Intersection of international achievement testing and educational policy (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
  • Normand, R. (2023). La transposition du paradigme PISA en France. Des formes d’autorité épistémique à l’ombre de l’État républicain (The transposition of the PISA paradigm in France. Forms of epistemic authority in the shadow of the republican state). Revista Lusófona de Educação, 59(59), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle59.07
  • Ozga, J. (2013). Accountability as a policy technology: Accounting for education performance in Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477763
  • Pereyra, M. P., Kotthoff, H.-G., & Cowen, R. (2011). PISA under examination. Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477763
  • Petrella, R. (1990). Reflexões sobre o futuro de Portugal e da Europa (Reflections on the future of Portugal and Europe). Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  • Pons, X. (2016). Tracing the French policy PISA debate: A policy configuration approach. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116659492
  • Portugal (1995a). November 7th Plenary Meeting. http://debates.parlamento.pt/catalogo/r3/dar/01/07/01/004/1995-11-09
  • Portugal (1995b). November 9th Plenary Meeting. http://debates.parlamento.pt/catalogo/r3/dar/01/07/01/004/1995-11-09
  • Portugal (1996a). July 18th Plenary Meeting. http://debates.parlamento.pt/catalogo/r3/dar/01/07/01/098/1996-07-18?sft=true#p3327
  • Portugal (1996b). November 28th Plenary Meeting. http://debates.parlamento.pt/catalogo/r3/dar/01/07/02/014/1996-11-28
  • Ringarp, J. (2016). PISA lends legitimacy: A study of education policy changes in Germany and Sweden after 2000. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116630754
  • Robinson, W. (2010). Documentary research. In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 186–198). Bloomsbury.
  • Sanches, A. (2001, December 9). O folhetim da participação portuguesa (The soap opera of portuguese participation). Público, p. 35.
  • Santos, I., & Centeno, V. G. (2021). Inspirations from abroad: The impact of PISA on countries’ choice of reference societies in education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 53(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2021.1906206
  • Schuelka, M. J. (2013). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.708789
  • Schut, R. K. (2019). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.708789
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3120
  • Sellar, S., Thompson, G., & Rutkowski, D. (2017). The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing. Brush Education.
  • Silova, I., Rappleye, J., & Auld, E. (2020). Beyond the western horizon: Rethinking education, values, and policy transfer. In G. Fan, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Handbook of education policy studies (pp. 3–29). SpringerOpen.
  • Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance – A critique of the project, its uses and implications. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1310a
  • Solano-Flores, G., & Milbourn, T. (2016). Assessment capacity, cultural validity and consequential validity in PISA. RELIEVE – Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8281
  • Stray, J. H., & Wood, B. (2020). Global-local education policy dynamics: A case study of New Zealand and Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1541818
  • Takayama, K. (2018). How to mess with PISA: Learning from Japanese kokugo curriculum experts. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2018.1435975
  • Teltemann, J., & Jude, N. (2019). Assessments and accountability in secondary education: International trends. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(2), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919846174
  • Teodoro, A. (2020). The end of isolationism: examining the OECD influence in Portuguese education policies, 1955–1974. Paedagogica Historica, 56(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2019.1606022
  • Teodoro, A., & Aníbal, G. (2008). A educação em tempos de globalização. Modernização e hibridismo nas políticas educativas em Portugal (Education in times of globalization: Modernization and hybridism in the educational policies in Portugal). Revista Lusófona de Educação, 10, 13–26.
  • Teodoro, A., & Lopo, T. T. (2021). The OECD again: Legitimization of a new vocationalism in the educational policies in Portugal (1979-1993). Paedagogica Historica, 59(5), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2021.1941143
  • Tight, M. (2019). Documentary research in the social sciences. SAGE.
  • Verger, A. (2016). The global diffusion of education privatization: Unpacking and theorizing policy adoption. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 64–80)Wiley.
  • Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2018). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045
  • Woodward, R. (2009). The organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD). Taylor & Francis.
  • Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x