Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Written Expression Curriculum-Based Measurement for Students With Diverse Language Backgrounds

REFERENCES

• Amato, J. M., & Watkins, M. W. (2011). The predictive validity of CBM writing indices for eighth-grade students. Journal of Special Education, 44, 195–204. doi:10.1177/0022466909333516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aud, S., Hussar, W., Johnson, F., Kena, G., Roth, E., Manning, E., … Zhang, J. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012–045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. K., & Good, R. H. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2008). Creating robust vocabulary: Frequently asked questions and extended examples. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J., Bolt, S., Decker, D., Muyskens, P., & Marston, D. (2009). Examining the role of time and language type in reading development for English language learners. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 143–166. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Espin, C. A., & McMaster, K. (2013). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based writing measures with English learners. Reading and Writing, 26, 431–452. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9375-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., Silberglitt, B., Yeo, S., & Cormier, D. (2010). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: An evaluation of growth rates and seasonal effects among students served in general and special education. School Psychology Review, 39, 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 36, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192. doi:10.1177/00224669030370030801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C., Skare, S., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140–153. doi:10.1177/002246690003400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C., Wallace, T., Campbell, H., Lembke, E. S., Long, J. D., & Ticha, R. (2008). Curriculum-based measurement in writing: Predicting the success of high-school students on state standards tests. Exceptional Children, 74, 174–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, R. (2010). Hispanics, high school dropouts and the GED. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Naquin, G. M., & Slider, N. J. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternate measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansle, K. A., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Noell, G. H., Resetar, J. L., & Williams, K. L. (2006). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students. School Psychology Review, 35, 435–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, A. W., & Rueda, R. (2009). Teaching written expression to culturally and linguistically diverse learners. In G. A. Troia (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 213–242). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34, 372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopstock, P. J., & Stephenson, T. G. (2003). Special Topic Report #2: Analysis of Office for Civil Rights (OCR) data related to LEP students. Arlington, VA: Developmental Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, J., & Malecki, C. K. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34, 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Petscher, Y. (2010). Improving the accuracy of a direct route screening process. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 131–140. doi:10.1177/1534508409348375
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Clemens, N. H., Im, M., Kwok, O., & Booth, C. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement yearly growth rates: An examination of English language learners and native English speakers. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 799–805. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Mercer, S. H., Payan, A., & McGee, W. (2014). Measuring annual growth using written expression curriculum-based measurement: An examination of seasonal and gender differences. School Psychology Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/spq0000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Payan, A., & Booth, C. (2012). Reading curriculum-based measures in Spanish: An examination of validity and diagnostic accuracy. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37, 212–223. doi:10.1177/1534508411435721
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Shapiro, E. S., & Hintze, J. M. (2008). Long term diagnostic accuracy of curriculum-based measures in reading and mathematics. School Psychology Review, 37, 374–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindler, A. (2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 1999–2000 summary report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. A., & Petscher, Y. (2010). School profiles of at-risk student concentration: Differential growth in oral reading fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 163–186. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, F. A., & Thompson, S. S. (2011). The relationship among measures of written expression using curriculum-based measurement and the Arizona Instrument to Measure Skills (AIMS) at the middle school level. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27, 129–152. doi:10.1080/1057356100376964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., & Campbell, H. (2008). New and existing curriculum-based writing measures: Technical features within and across grades. School Psychology Review, 37, 550–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing. Journal of Special Education, 41, 68–84. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S., Martínez, R. S., Faust, D., & Mitchell, R. R. (2012). Criterion-related validity of writing curriculum-based measurement (WCBM) in high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Participation in education: Language minority school-age children. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2010/section1/indicator05.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2013). Multi-tier system of supports/response to intervention. Retrieved online from http://www.ncld.org/disability-advocacy/where-we-stand-policies/multi-tier-system-supports-response-intervention
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.A. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., McMaster, K. L., Medhanie, A., & Silberglitt, B. (2011). Modeling early writing growth with curriculum-based measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 290–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passel, J. S., Cohn, D., & Lopez, H. (2011). Hispanics account for more than half of nation's growth in past decade. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson Education. (2010). AIMSweb: Written expression CBM: Training workbook. Bloomington, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson Education. (2012). AIMSweb: ELL profile reports and norms development guide. Bloomington, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Persky, H. R., Daane, M. C., & Jin, Y. (2003). The nation's report card: Writing 2002. (NCES 2003–529). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., Ochoa, S., & Ortiz, S. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, K. D., & Coker, D. L. (2013). An investigation of the validity and utility of two curriculum-based measurement writing tasks. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29, 89–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, K. L., & Reschly, A. L. (2011). English learners: Challenges in assessment and the promise of curriculum-based measurement. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 144–154. doi:10.1177/0741932510361260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Keller, M. A., Lutz, J., Santoro, L., & Hintze, J. M. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests: Reading and math performance in Pennsylvania. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 19–35. doi:10.1177/0734282905285237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. (2005). Formative assessment using CBM-R cut scores to track progress toward success on state-mandated achievement tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 304–325. doi:10.1177/073428290502300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1–26. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2012). Technical digest 2011–2012. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=25769805232
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1989). Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs. Journal of Special Education, 23, 169–183. doi:10.1177/002246698902300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2011). Technical adequacy of response to intervention decisions. Exceptional Children, 77, 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Naquin, G. (2003). Development and validation of a process for screening referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32, 204–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videen, J., Marston, D., & Deno, S. L. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Vol. IRLD-RR-84, pp. 61). Minnesota Univ, Minneapolis Inst for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissenburger, J., & Espin, C. A. (2005). Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 153–169. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Mather, N. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement normative update. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar