The Impact of Transcription Writing Interventions for First-Grade Students

References

• Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, K., Masterson, J. J., & Hart, P. (2004). Integration of language components in spelling: Instruction that maximizes students’ learning. Language and literacy learning in schools. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W. (1998). Process Assessment of the Learner guides for intervention handwriting lessons. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. doi:10.2307/1511269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flowers’ model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., Brooks, A., & Reed, E. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652–666. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtin, G., & Hawkins, J. M. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291–204. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Brooks, A., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., & Reed, E. (1998). Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 587–605. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourassa, D. C., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Memory & Cognition, 34, 703–714. doi:10.3758/BF03193589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620. doi:10.1080/00207599408248175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, C. A., & Herbert, E. H. (1985). A comparison of classroom writing practices, teachers’ perceptions of their writing instruction, and textbook recommendations on writing practices. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 155–172. doi:10.1086/461440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479–492. doi:10.1348/000709906x116768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., & Whitaker, D. (1997). The role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chorzempa, B. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896. doi:10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, N. V., Fitzpatrick, P., & Cortesa, C. (2010). In-depth analysis of handwriting curriculum and instruction in four kindergarten classrooms. Springer Science+Business Media, 23, 673–699. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9178-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, J., & Malecki, C. K. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34, 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing, 27, 1163–1188. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Puranik, C. (2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 199–211. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0152)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 517–525. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Wanzek, J., & Gatlin, B. (2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 79–95. doi:10.1037/a0037210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Apel, K., & Al Otaiba, S. (2013). The relation of linguistic awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling for first-grade students participating in response to intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 337–347. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0013)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembke, E., Deno, S. L., & Hall, K. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 23–35. doi:10.1177/073724770302800304
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Woodcock, R. W. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III normative update technical manual. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Du, X., & Petursdottir, A. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measure for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 41–60. doi:10.1177/0022219408326212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Du, X., Yeo, S., Deno, S., Parker, D., & Ellis, T. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77, 185–206. doi:10.1177/001440291107700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. Journal of Special Education, 41, 68–84. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/neglectedr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2005). Writing: A powerful message from state government. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/powerful-message-from-state.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association, & Council of Chief School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards initiative: Preparing America’s students for college and career. Washington, DC: National Governors Association & Council of Chief School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2009). The relationship between the discourse knowledge and the writing performance of elementary-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 37–50. doi:10.1037/a0013462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, T., & Kellog, R. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 594–600. doi:10.3758/BF03194960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., & Al Otaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25, 1523–1546. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J., & Greulich, L. (2014). Exploring the amount and type of writing instruction during language arts instruction in kindergarten classrooms. Reading and Writing, 27, 213–236. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Goleman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 173–210). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L. G., Tschinkel, E., & Kantor, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24, 203–220. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasowicz, J., Apel, K., Masterson, J. J., & Whitney, A. (2004). SPELL-links to reading and writing. Evanston, IL: Learning by Design.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 101–128. doi:10.1086/461918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, March). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement (3rd ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., & Chan, S. (2014). Uniqueness and overlap: Characteristics and longitudinal correlates of native Chinese children’s writing in English as a foreign language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 347–363. doi:10.1017/S1366728913000163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar