Tutoring in Critical Thinking: Using the Stases to Scaffold High School Students’ Reading and Writing of Persuasive Text

References

• Aristotle. (1991). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnet, S., & Bedau, H. (2011). From critical thinking to argument (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, R., Riley, J., Myhill, D., & Nystrand, M. (Eds.). (2009). Sage handbook of writing development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, K., & Samuels, B. (1998). Into focus: Understanding and creating middle school readers. Norwood, NJ: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2011). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (International ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. (1976). De inventione, De optimo genere, Topica [On invention, best kind of orator topics] (H. M. Hubbell Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. (1986). Cicero on oratory and orators (J. S. Watson Trans.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. (2001). On the ideal orator (J. M. May & J. Wisse Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 203–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 51–93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1983). Grounds for argument: Stasis theory and the topoi. In D. Zarefsky M. O. Sillars & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Proceedings of the third summer conference on argumentation (pp. 135–146). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1985). Toward a modern version of stasis. In C. Kneupper (Ed.), Oldspeak/newspeak: Rhetorical transformations (pp. 217–226). Arlington, VA: Rhetoric Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1988). The stases in scientific and literary argument. Written Communication, 5, 427–443. doi:10.1177/0741088388005004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive dimensions of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter (S. Sampson Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case study research. In C. Seale G. Gobo J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (p. 390–405). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. (1994). Metacognition and executive control. In R. B. Ruddell M. R. Ruddell & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 715–732). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2014). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. Champaign, IL: Common Ground.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2013). Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, M. F. (2004). Theories and constructs that have made a significant difference in adolescent literacy: But have the potential to produce still more positive benefits. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 433–452). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, C. L., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. L. (2001). Apprenticing adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71(1), 79–130. doi:10.17763/haer.71.1.q811712577334038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, M. (1995). Hermogenes on issues: Strategies of argument in later Greek rhetoric. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermogenes. (2009). On types of style (C. W. Wooten Trans.). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, J. A. (2012). The history and theory of rhetoric: An introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G., Jr. (2011). Teaching argument writing, grades 6–12: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2017). Standards for the preparation of literacy professionals 2017. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association/National Council of Teachers of English. (2012, November). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE, and Urbana, IL: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., & Beck, I. L. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271–299. doi:10.3102/00346543067003271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (1991). Aristotle and the stasis theory: A re-examination. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 21, 53–59. doi:10.1080/02773949109390908
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of writing research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(2011), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Dillon, D. R., & O’Brien, D. G. (2000). Re-examining the roles of the learner, the text, and the context in secondary literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 165–180. doi:10.1080/00220670009598705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. P. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R. (1959). Classical systems of stases in Greek: Hermagoras to Hermogenes. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 2, 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R. (1964). Hermogenes’ on stasis: A translation with an introduction. Speech Monographs, 31, 361–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R. (1969). Some Aristotelian and stoic influences on the theory of stasis. Speech Monographs, 26, 419–425.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading assessment (NCES 2015–136). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading at grade 12 (NCES 2016–108). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1991). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published in French in 1958)
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Marks, M. B. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists! Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3–31. doi:10.1007/bf01322393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullman, G. L. (1995). Deliberative rhetoric and forensic stasis: Reconsidering the scope and function of an ancient rhetorical heuristic in the aftermath. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 25, 223–230. doi:10.1080/02773949509391045
   Google Scholar
• Quintilian. (1980). Institutio oratoria [Institutes of oratory] (H. E. Butler Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. J., & Smith, M. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (Eds.). (2010). Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, W. H. (2004). Teaching English from a literacy perspective: The goal of high literacy for all students. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 40–58). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, W. H. (2013a, March). Scaffolding argument development: Using the stases as a reading and writing problem-solving strategy with minority tenth-graders. Paper presented at the Oxford Education Research Symposium, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, W. H. (2013b, April). Using the stases as a reading and writing problem-solving strategy with on-grade level tenth-graders: Eight case studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, W. H., & Horstman, F. R. (2002). Teaching reading and writing to struggling middle school and high school students: The case for reciprocal teaching. Preventing School Failure, 46(4), 163–166. doi:10.1080/10459880209604416
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2007, April). Reconsidering generalization and theory in case study research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. (2001). Teaching problem solving as a way of life. In A. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd. ed., pp. 451–454). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1992). Text structure, comprehension, and recall. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 220–228). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. N. (1972). Stasis in Aristotle’s rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58, 134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wharton-McDonald, R. (2006). The need for increased comprehension instruction. In M. Pressley (Ed.), Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (pp. 293–346). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. S. (1998a). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 49–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. S. (1998b). Validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative writing of middle school students. Assessing Writing, 5(1), 123–150. doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80009-9
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar