“DUDE UR GUNNA BE A GREAT TEACHER YO”: Cultivating Diverse Englishes Through Chatroom Discussions Between Preservice Teachers and Urban High School Youth

References

• Alvermann, D. E. (Ed.). (2010). Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, and popular culture (Vol. 39). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by Mikhail Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. (2009). Knowledge construction and the education of citizens in diverse societies. Keynote address September, at the Interkulturell Pedagogik Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speech and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298. doi:10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992a). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992b). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4(3), 269–293. doi:10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-g
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fecho, B., Davis, B., & Moore, R. (2012). Exploring race, language, and culture in critical literacy classrooms. In D. E. Alvermann & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives: Bridging the everyday/academic divide (3rd ed., pp. 139–159). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., & Seglem, R. (2013). “That is dope no lie”: Supporting adolescent literacy practices through digital partnerships. In P. J. Dunston, S. K. Fullerton, C. C. Bates, K. Headley, & P. M. Stecker (Eds.), Literacy research association yearbook 62 (pp. 185–197). Chicago, IL: Literacy Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., Seglem, R., & Carlson, P. (2013). “Y’all laggin’!”: Exploring the intersection of academic and youth language practices through digital tools. In J. Keengwe, G. Onchwari, & D. Hucks (Eds.), Literacy enrichment and technology integration in pre-service teacher education. (pp. 263–280). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in the discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2010). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Godley, A. J., Carpenter, B. D., & Werner, C. A. (2007). “I’ll speak in proper slang”: Language ideologies in a daily editing activity. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 100–131. doi:10.1598/rrq.42.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits and repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189x032005019
   Google Scholar
• Hinchman, K. A., & Young, J. P. (2001). Speaking but not being heard: Two adolescents negotiate classroom talk about text. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(2), 243–268. doi:10.1080/10862960109548111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. (1997). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, D. (2010). English(es) in urban contexts: Politics, pluralism, and possibilities. English Education, 42(3), 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, R. A., & Morales, P. Z. (2014). Puras Groserías? Rethinking the role of profanity and graphic humor in Latin@ students’ bilingual wordplay. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 45(4), 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language together. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., & Tysvaer, N. (2010). Adolescent literacy development in out-of-school time: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. (2004). Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for shared identity creation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 49, 375–396. doi:10.1353/cjl.2006.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. (2012). “Struggling” adolescents’ engagement in multimediating: Countering the institutional construction of incompetence. In D. E. Alvermann & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives: Bridging the everyday/academic divide (3rd ed., pp. 71–91). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orellana, M., Lee, C., & Martínez, D. (2010). More than just a hammer: Building linguistic toolkits. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Plester, B., Wood, C., & Bell, V. (2008). Txt msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment? Literacy, 42(3), 137–144. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00489.x
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglem, R., & Garcia, A. (2015). “So we have to teach them or what?”: Introducing pre-service teachers to the figured worlds of urban youth through digital conversation. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, A. W. (2012). Adolescent’s multiple identities and teacher professional development. In D. E. Alvermann & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives: Bridging the everyday/academic divide (3rd ed., pp. 207–223). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker-Raymond, E., & Rosario, M.L. (2017). Imagining identities: Young people constructing discourses of race, ethnicity, and community in a contentious context of rapid urban development. Urban Education, 52(1), 32–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. (2013). “You need some laugh bones!”: Leveraging AAL in a high school English classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(2), 173–206. doi:10.1177/1086296x12474653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., Grant, C., Gay, G., Gillette, M., Valli, L., & Villegas, A. M. (1998). A research informed vision of good practice in multicultural teacher education: Design principles. Theory Into Practice, 37(2), 163–211. doi:10.1080/00405849809543800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar