Collaborative Reasoning With Strategy Instruction for Opinion Writing in Primary Grades: Two Cycles of Design Research

References

• Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S-y., Reznitskaya, A., … Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1–46. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1991). The art of rhetoric (H. Lawson-Tancred, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, P. J. (1983). Extended arguments in children’s discourse. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 20, 72–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (2003). The units of study for primary writing: A yearlong curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (2006). Units of study for teaching writing, grades 3–5. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, O. B., Patterson, L. J., Donovan, R. J., Ewing, M. T., & Roberts, C. M. (2011). Children’s understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 962–968. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1998). The structure of discussions intended to promote reasoning. Teachers College Record, 100, 315–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A.-M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L., Kim, I.-H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 2181–2198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coirier, P., & Golder, C. (1993). Writing argumentative text: A developmental study of the acquisition of supporting structures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 169–181. doi:10.1007/BF03173160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, D. L., Jr. Jennings, A. S., Farley-Ripple, E., & MacArthur, C. A. (2018). The type of writing instruction and practice matters: The direct and indirect effects of writing instruction and student practice on reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 505–517. doi:10.1037/edu0000232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, D., Jennings, A., Farley-Ripple, L., & MacArthur, C. A. (submitted). When the type of practice matters: The relationship between typical writing instruction, student practice, and writing achievement in first grade. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1987). Development of justification in disputes with mother and sibling. Developmental Psychology, 23, 791–798. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–372. doi:10.3102/00028312028002337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldgus, E. G., & Cardonick, I. (1999). Kid writing: A systematic approach to phonics, journals, and writing workshop (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 694–702. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2007). Implementing a schoolwide literacy framework: Improving achievement in an urban elementary school. The Reading Teacher, 61, 32–45. doi:10.1598/RT.61.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R. (2005). Behind the scenes of an intervention research study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 200–212. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00134.x
   Google Scholar
• Golder, C., & Coirier, P. (1994). Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends. Discourse Processes, 18, 187–210. doi:10.1080/01638539409544891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=17
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chambers, A. B. (2016). Evidence based practice and writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 211–226). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 177–202. doi:10.1207/S1532799Xssr0502_3
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744. doi:10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S. A., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896. doi:10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, A.-L., Duke, N. K., Brugar, K. A., Block, M. K., Strachan, S. L., Berka, M. B., & Brown, J. M. (2012). Narrowing the achievement gap in second-grade social studies and content area literacy: The promise of a project-based approach. Theory and Research in Social Education, 40, 198–229. doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.705954
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 6, 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Reid, R., & Mason, L. (2011). Self-regulated learning processes and children’s writing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 187–202). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2007). A formative experiment investigating literacy engagement among adolescent Latina/o students just beginning to read, write, and speak English. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 512–545. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing, 27, 1163–1188. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155–178. doi:10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and value of argumentative discourse. Discourse Processes, 48, 26–49. doi:10.1080/01638531003653344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber, P. (1994). Be a friend to trees. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Leaf, M. (1936). The story of Ferdinand. New York, NY: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A. (2011). Strategies instruction. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Applications of educational psychology to learning and teaching (pp. 379–401). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. New York, NY: The College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 273–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London, UK: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, G. (1983). The gradual release of responsibility model of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–123. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. (2012). Effects of reviewing on fourth and fifth-grade students’ persuasive writing and revising (Doctoral dissertation). Available from WorldCat. (OCLC No. 830832350)
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. (2017a). Teachers’ writing practices after the Common Core State Standards: Is writing “in”? American Reading Forum Conference Proceedings, 37, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. (2017b). The use of responses to reading as a vehicle to opinion writing in the primary grades. The Language and Literacy Spectrum, 27, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. (2018). Using a task analysis process for reading and writing assignments. Reading Teacher, 72(1), 107–114. doi:10.1002/trtr.1690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2016a). The effects of giving feedback on the persuasive writing of fourth- and fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 419–433. doi:10.1002/rrq.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2016b). The use of genre-specific evaluation criteria for revision. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 2, 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (in press). Developing strategic writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades K-2. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., MacArthur, C. A., & Coker, D. L. (2015). Developing strategic writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades 3–5. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & Moore, N. (2017). The literacy coach’s role in supporting teachers’ implementation of the Common Core State Standards in writing. In S. Lawrence (Ed.), Literacy program evaluation and development initiatives for P-12 teaching (pp. 114–137). Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference. IGI-Global.
   Google Scholar
• Pouit, D., & Golder, C. (1996). Can one facilitate written argumentation? Effects of a text schema, a list of ideas and a familiar topic. Archives De Psychologie, 64, 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). On formative and design experiments. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155–175. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Hsu, J. Y., & Anderson, R. C. (2015). Using inquiry dialogue to promote the development of argument skills: Possibilities, challenges, and new directions. In S. Parris & K. Headley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (3rd ed.) (pp. 29?44). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 29–48. doi:10.1080/03057640802701952
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. (1998). Methodology and the research-practice gap. Educational Researcher, 27, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R. (2005). Generalizability of writing scores: An application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (2015). 2014 Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture: Rigor and realism: Doing educational science in the real world. Educational Researcher, 44, 460–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprott, R. A. (1992). On giving reasons in verbal disputes: The development of justifying. Argumentation & Advocacy, 29, 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Trainin, G., Hiebert, E. H., & Wilson, K. M. (2015). A comparison of reading rates, comprehension, and stamina in oral and silent reading of fourth-grade students. Reading Psychology, 36, 595–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggoner, M., Chinn, C., Yi, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Collaborative reasoning about stories. Language Arts, 72, 582–589.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, M. (2003). Don’t let the pigeon drive the bus. New York, NY: Hyperion Books for Children.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, M. (2008). The pigeon wants a puppy! London, UK: Walker Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. R. (2011). Argumentation across the curriculum. Written Communication, 28, 193–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2013). Language-rich discussions for English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar