Profiles of Oral and Reading Comprehension in Poor Comprehenders

References

• Adlof, S. M., & Catts, H. W. (2015). Morphosyntax in poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9562-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (2003). Test for reception of grammar-2nd Edition (TROG-2). Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, L., Huisingh, R., & LoGiudice, C. (2005). Test of Problem Solving–3rd Edition Elementary (TOPS-3). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer‐Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children's inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(Pt 2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2010). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence–4th Edition (TONI-4). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K. (2006). Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: An investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory, 14(5), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210600624481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The nature of the relationship between comprehension skill and the ability to tell a story. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1996.tb00701.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(Pt 4), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 13(1/2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008051414854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL). American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Cataldo, M. G., & Cornoldi, C. (1998). Self‐monitoring in poor and good reading comprehenders and their use of strategy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00915.x.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, P. J., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children's reading-comprehension difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610375449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – 4th Edition (PPVT-4). Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British Picture Vocabulary Scale II. NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R. B., & Pearson, N. A. (2004). Test of Narrative Language (TNL). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T., Bridges, M. S., Justice, L. M., & Cain, K. (2011). Increasing higher level language skills to improve reading comprehension. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(3), 1–20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/specedfacpub/79/.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, K., Whitworth, A., Parsons, R., & Leitao, S. (2020). Hidden reading difficulties: Identifying children who are poor comprehenders. Learning Disability Quarterly, First published October 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720961766.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension. In S.G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 71–92). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00487.x.
   Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). Learning to read: Should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1989). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, C., & Lallaway, M. (2012). New Salford Sentence Reading & Comprehension Cards. Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C. M., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S., & Bishop, D. V. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 51(9), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Snowling, M. J., & Clarke, P. (2007). Dissecting the relationship between language skills and learning to read: Semantic and phonological contributions to new vocabulary learning in children with poor reading comprehension. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040601145166.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. D. (1997). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA-II). NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 35(3), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402481.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2015). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Parkin, A. (1986). On the nature of the difference between skilled and less‐skilled comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 9(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1986.tb00115.x.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, C., & Parkin, C. (2011). PROBE-2 Reading Comprehension Assessment. Triune.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C.M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701344306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2006). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-4th Edition, Australian Edition (CELF-4 Australian). Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Stothard, S. E., Clarke, P., Bowyer-Crane, C., Harrington, A., Truelove, E., Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (2012). York assessment of reading for comprehension-primary, Australian Edition (YARC-P Australian). GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• The Competing Language Processing Task In: Gaulin, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (1994). Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of Word Reading Efficiency–2nd Edition (TOWRE–2). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2012). The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing–2nd Edition (CTOPP-2). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2007). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–2nd Edition: Australian Standardised Edition (WIAT-II Australian). Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. (2011). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–3rd Edition (WRMT-III). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar