Ipad Text-to-Speech and Repeated Reading to Improve Reading Comprehension for Students with SLD

References

• Al Otaiba, S., Rouse, A. G., & Baker, K. (2018). Elementary grade intervention approaches to treat specific learning disabilities, including dyslexia. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995–2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509355988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqahtani, S. S. (2020). Technology-based interventions for children with reading difficulties: a literature review from 2010 to 2020. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3495–3525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09859-1
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, B. R., Kim, M. K., Ok, M. W., Kang, E. Y., Bryant, D. P., Lang, R., & Son, S. H. (2015). A comparison of the effects of reading interventions on engagement and performance for fourth-grade students with learning disabilities. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514561316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K. (1996). Story knowledge and comprehension skill. In C. Cornoldi & J. V. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 167–192). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, K. (2009). The role of cognitive flexibility in reading comprehension: Past, present, and future. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 115–139). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ciullo, S., Falcomata, T. S., Pfannenstiel, K., & Billingsley, G. (2015). Improving learning with science and social studies text using computer-based concept maps for students with disabilities. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514552890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baker, S. K., Doabler, C., & Apichatabutra, C. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75, 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500301
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J., Keesey, S., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Wheaton, J. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction using Kurzweil 3000 on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2007). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, M. M., & Buggey, T. (2014). Using video self- and peer modeling to facilitate reading fluency in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412450618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denckla, M. B., Barouero, L. A., Linosrrom, E. R., Benedict, S. l., Wilson, L. M., & Cutting, L. E. (2013). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, executive function, and reading comprehension. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 155–168). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, P. M., Larson, K., Matskewich, T., & Yeatman, J. D. (2019). Annotating digital text with phonemic cues to support decoding in struggling readers. PsyArXiv, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7mw5b
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavelek, J., & Bresnahan, P. (2009). Ways of meaning making: Sociocultural perspectives on reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel, & Duffy, G. G. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 140–176). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1996). How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Wagner, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. The American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M T. (1997). The need for replication studies—Is it really a done deal? Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 25(3), 161–162. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1997.25.3.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2017). An update to compiled ORF norms (Technical Report No. 1702). Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, C. M., & Bateman, B. D. (2013). Learning disabilities and the law. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 51–68). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2004). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000103
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, C. H., Prater, M. A., & Dowrick, P. W. (2004). Reading comprehension and fluency: Examining the effects of tutoring and video self-modeling on first-grade students with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, Y., Yuan, C., Monroe, K., Hinzman, M. L., Alqahtani, S., Alwahbi, A. A., & Kern, A. M. (2018). Effects of the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend and goal setting intervention on decoding and reading comprehension skills of young adults with intellectual disabilities. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 21, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2016.1139011
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidifarsani, H., Garbaya, S., Lim, T., Blazevic, P., & Ritchie, J. M. (2019). Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: An analytical review. Computers & Education, 128, 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E., del Rosario Ortiz, M., Rodrigo, M., Hernández-Valle, I., Ramírez, G., Estévez, A., O'Shanahan, I., & de la Luz Trabaue, M. (2003). Do the effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ-achievement discrepancy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360010501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A.-H., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Woodruff, A. L., Reutebuch, C. K., & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27(4), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270040401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Park, Y. (2017). A synthesis of interventions for improving oral reading fluency of elementary students with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1212321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Singlecase designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1973). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larabee, K. M., Burns, M. K., & McComas, J. J. (2014). Effects of an iPad-supported phonics intervention on decoding performance and time on-task. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9214-8
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, G. R., & Weiser, B. (2013). The state of the science in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 118–154). Guilford press.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrothanais, K., Kalianou, M., Katsifi, S., & Zouganali, A. (2018). The use of metacognitive knowledge and regulation strategies of students with and without special learning difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 184–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mize, M., Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2019). Teaching reading to students with learning disabilities: Effects of combined iPad-assisted and peer-assisted instruction on oral reading fluency performance. Assistive Technology, 32(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1559896
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, A., Boon, R. T., Keller-Bell, Y., Stagliano, C., & Jeffs, T. (2010). Effects of text-to-speech software on the reading rate and comprehension skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Musti-Rao, S., Lo, Y. Y., & Plati, E. (2015). Using an iPad® app to improve sight word reading fluency for at-risk first graders. Remedial and Special Education, 36(3), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514541485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (2019). The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2020). Students With Disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Learning Disabilities (2014). Learning Disability Fast Facts. http://www.ncld.org/types-learning-disabilities/what-is-ld/learning-disability-fast-facts
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Learning Disabilities (2017). The State of Learning Disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5. Retrieved from https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Executive-Summary.Fin_.03142017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., White, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okolo, M. C., & Ferretti, P. R. (2013). History instruction for students with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 448–462). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D. (2011). Testing the acceleration hypothesis: Fluency outcomes utilizing still- versus accelerated-text in sixth-grade students with reading disabilities. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(4), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.518661
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B., Gillam, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Emerging procedures in narrative assessment: The index of narrative complexity. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000318933.46925.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. K., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Retell as an indicator of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.538780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavioral research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E. (2013). Science and social studies education for students with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 448–462). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, A., Leitão, S., & Blosfelds, M. (2019). WordDriver-1: Evaluating the efficacy of an app-supported decoding intervention for children with reading impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2011). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrell, C. A., Bell, S. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2007). Reading rate and comprehension as a function of computerized versus traditional presentation mode: A preliminary study. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340702200101
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, M., Wagner, R. K., & Petscher, Y. (2019). The reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: Evidence from a regression-based matching approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., Walker, M. A., & Vaughn, S. (2017). The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 576–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416638028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stodden, R. A., Roberts, K. D., Takahashi, K., Park, H. J., & Stodden, N. J. (2012). Use of text-to-speech software to improve reading skills of high school struggling readers. Procedia Computer Science, 14, 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.041
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2013). Overview of foundations, causes, instruction, and methodology in the field of learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 3–14). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading – A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J., & Hughes, C. (2008). Comparison of repeated reading and question generation on students' reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J., Kirk, J. F., & Woods-Groves, S. (2012). Comparison of a reading fluency intervention with and without passage repetition on reading achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00209.x
   Google Scholar
• Wade, E., Boon, R. T., & Spencer, V. G. (2010). Use of Kidspiration [C] software to enhance the reading comprehension of story grammar components for elementary-age students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 8(2), 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416688170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar