Investigating the Relationship between Perceptions of a “Good Reader” and Reading Performance among Elementary and Middle School Students: An Exploratory Study

References

• Alonzo, J., Tindal, G., Ulmer, K., & Glasgow, A. (2006). easyCBM online progress monitoring assessment system. Center for Educational Assessment Accountability.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. E. (1995). What is the effect of recreational reading on reading achievement of middle grade students? https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED391143.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, A. E., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M., Francis, D., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Reliability and validity of oral reading fluency median and mean scores among middle grade readers when using equated texts. Reading Psychology, 33(1–2), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.631863.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basaran, M. (2013). Reading fluency as an indicator of reading comprehension. Educational Sciences, 13(4), 2287–2290. 10.12738/estp.2013.4.1922.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, E. (1990). Seeing it their way: What children’s definitions of reading tell us about improving teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100505.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., & Eisenhart, M. (1986). Students’ conceptions of reading and their reading experiences in school. The Elementary School Journal, 86(5), 589–611. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1001272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, B. (2015). Good readers get smart: Reading orientations in a second-grade classroom. Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1045772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Afflerbach, P., Kendeou, P., Biancarosa, G., Higgs, J., Fitzgerald, M., & Berman, A. (2020). How the reading for understanding initiative’s research complicates the simple view of reading invoked in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.343.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. B. (2012). ‘It’s me. I’m fixin’ to know the hard words’: Children’s perceptions of ‘good readers’ as portrayed in their representational drawings. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2012.657746 .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://www.ime.usp.br/∼abe/lista/pdfn45sGokvRe.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, D., & Covert, R. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(4), 305–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Piasta, S. B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E., Underwood, P., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child × instruction interactions on first graders’ literacy development. Child Development, 80(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01247.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practice in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12968/sece.2005.9.482.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S., & Neitzel, C. (2010). The relationship between students’ reading orientations and their strategic activity during a collaborative reading task. Reading Psychology, 31(6), 546–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903256593.
   Google Scholar
• Deeney, T. (2010). One‐minute fluency measures: Mixed messages in assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 440–528. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.6.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EasyCBM. (2019). Behavioral research and teaching. https://easycbm.com.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3.
   Google Scholar
• Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400030301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (2006). The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does. Heinemann.]
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2017). An update to compiled ORF norms (Technical Report No. 1702). Behavioral Research and Teaching. University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644. https://journals.sagepub.com.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1998). Upper elementary-aged children's reported perceptions about good readers: A self-efficacy influenced update in transitional literacy contexts. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079809558277.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its accuracy. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 304–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. (2012). Reading statistics and research (6th ed). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.8.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108–446. U.S.C., §1400, (December 3, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Johns, J. L., & Ellis, D. W. (1976). Reading: Children tell it like it is. Reading World, 16(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388077609557350.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. C. (2005). What makes a good reader? Asking students to define good readers. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 766–770. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.8.6.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M. (2019). Componential model of reading (CMR): Implications for assessment and instruction of literacy problems. In D. A. Kilpatrick, R. M. Joshi, & R.K. Wagner (Eds.), Reading development and difficulties (pp. 3–18). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2012). Componential model of reading (CMR): Validation studies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411431240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading com-prehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Levy, B. A., & Rasinski, T. V. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–253. 10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information-processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Yochum, N. (1991). Asking Students about the nature of their reading difficulties. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547754.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J., & Skolits, G. (2013). October). Twelve steps of data cleaning: Strategies for dealing with dirty evaluation data. Workshop presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, L. (2015). Perceptions about “good readers”: Analyzing curricular, linguistic, and socioeconomic differences. Journal of Research in Education, 25(1), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S., & Bishop, D. V. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 51(9), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2019a). easyCBM in reading passage reading fluency. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/screening/tool/?id=5b9738f66544d335.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2019b). MAP growth reading. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/screening/tool/?id=2d5745f974bccbd7.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson Inc. (2019). AIMSweb. https://aimsweb.pearson.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Nese, J., Park, B. J., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2011). Applied curriculum-based measurement as a predictor of high-stakes assessment: Implications for researchers and teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1086/659034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2018, July 16). Is there a max RIT score a student can get? https://community.nwea.org/docs/DOC-1651.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2019). MAP growth grade level test guidance (K-2 to 2-5). https://teach.mapnwea.org/impl/GradelevelTestGuidance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2020a). MAP Growth [Webinar]. https://www.nwea.org/resource-library/webinars/map-growth-webinar.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2020b). MAP growth: Precisely measure student growth and performance. https://www.nwea.org/map-growth/.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. Tata McGraw-Hill Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Petscher, Y., & Kim, Y. (2011). The utility and accuracy of oral reading fluency score types in predicting reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 49(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.6.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Allington, R. L. (2014). Reading instruction that works. (4th ed., p. 223.). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. (1989). Fluency for everyone: Incorporating fluency instruction in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 42(9), 690–693. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20200275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2013). Assessment: In special and inclusive education (12th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 563–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J., & Farstrup, A. E. (Eds.). (2006). What research has to say about fluency instruction. International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. B. Neuman, & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (vol. 1, pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schonemann, P. H. (1990). Facts, fictions, and common-sense about factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Regents of the University of California. (2022). Smarter Balanced. https://smarterbalanced.org/
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, H. A., & Wolking, W. D. (1989). Effects of oral reading rate on verbal responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392839.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, B., Diamond, K. E., McWilliam, R., Snyder, P., & Snyder, S. W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thum, Y. M., & Hauser, C. H. (2015). NWEA 2015 MAP norms for student and school achievement status and growth. Northwest Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• UO Dibels Data System. (2019). University of Oregon Center on Teaching and Learning. https://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R., Beal, B., Zirps, F. A., & Spencer, M. (2021). A model-based meta-analytic examination of specific reading comprehension deficit: How prevalent is it and does the simple view of reading account for it? Annals of Dyslexia, 71(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00232-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Samuels, S. J. (2004). May). How the amount of time spent on independent reading affects reading achievement [Paper presentation]. International Reading Association, Reno, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, Y., & Meisels, S. J. (2004). Early literacy instruction and learning in kindergarten: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study—kindergarten class of 1998–1999. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 191–229. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar