A Comparison Between U.S. and Chinese Principal Decision-Making Power: A Measurement Perspective Based on PISA 2015

References

• 17th Communist Party of China National Congress. 2010. National Outline for Medium and Long-term Education Reform and Development. Retrieved July 5th, 2018 athttp://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/planipolis/files/ressources/china_national_long_term_educational_reform_development_2010-2020.pdf. Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., and P. T. Herzberg 2006. On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling 13(2):186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., U. Boser, S. Sargrad, and M. Marchitello. 2016. Implementing the every student succeeds act: toward a coherent, aligned assessment system. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T. 2009. Leadership development and school improvement: Contemporary issues in leadership development. Educational Review 61:375–89. doi: 10.1080/00131910903403956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T., and D. Jackson. 2002. A preparation for school leadership: International perspectives. Educational Management and Administration 30:417–29.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., R. J. Shavelson, and B. Muthén. 1989. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin 105:456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456(accessed July 5th, 2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCCPC. 2013. Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on some major issues concerning comprehensively deepening the reform. Adopted at the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (12 November). www.china.org.cn/china/third_plenary_session/2014-01/16/content_31212602.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., and Y. Zhu. 2014. Curriculum reforms in China: history and the present day. Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres. http://ries.revues.org/3846
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T. C., and R. Du. 2008. School principal profiles: Comparing China and the United States. Journal of Global Initiatives 3:87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 1999. What constitutes significant differences in evaluating measurement invariance? Paper presented at the Conference of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P. W., J. P. Howell, S. Hibino, J. K. Lee, U. Tate, and A. Bautista. 1997. Leadership in Western and asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly 8:233–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., B. Thompson, and L. Wang. 1999. Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling 6:56–83. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, D. 2008. Leadership strategies for learning improvement: Cases from mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 24:50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2010. The awesome power of the principal. Principal 89:10.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., and N. Watson. 2000. School-based management: reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement 11(4):453–473.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X. 2016. Correlates and effects of data-informed decision-making: An empirical examination of the loose coupling theory using a national data set (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1957.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. 2003. The emergence of school leadership development in an era of globalization 1980–2002. In Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective, ed. P. Hallinger, 3–22. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., and J. J. McArdle. 1992. A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research 18:117–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., and Wiseman, A. W. (Eds.). 2011. The impact and transformation of education policy in China. Vol. 15. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Javidan, M., P. W. Dorfman, M. S. De Luque, and R. J. House. 2006. In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from project GLOBE. 20:67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and P. Hallinger. 2012. National contexts influencing principals’ time use and allocation: economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23(4):461–482. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.678862
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2008. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management 28:27–42. doi: 10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., J. R. Balla, and R. P. McDonald. 1988. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin 103:391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., and G. J. Lautenschlager. 2004. Same question, different answers: CFA and two IRT approaches to measurement invariance. Symposium presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., and G. J. Lautenschlager. 2004. A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods 7:361–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, L., J. Krejsler, and K. K. Kofod. 2008. Successful principals: Telling or selling? On the importance of context for school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education 11:341–52.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., and T. Asparouhov. 2002. Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes 4(5):1–22. Retrieved July 5th 2017 from ehttps://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Portin, B. S., and J. Shen. 1998. The changing principalship: Its current status, variability, and impact. The Journal of Leadership Studies 5:93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Portin, B., J. Shen, and R. Williams. 1998. The changing principalship and its impact: Voices from principals. NASSP Bulletin 82:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, N. S., L. J. Laffitte, and B. M. Byrne. 2002. Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology 87:517–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., K. F. Widaman, and R. H. Pugh. 1993. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin 114:552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, C. E., J. Hannaway, D. Goldhaber, and D. Figlio. 2007. Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure (No. 13681). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeders, U., and O. Wilhelm. 2011. Equivalence of reading and listening comprehension across test media. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(5): 849–869.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. and Associates. 2005. School principals. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., and J. Xia. 2012. The relationship between teachers’ and principals’ decision-making power: Is it a win-win situation or a zero-sum game? International Journal of Leadership in Education 15:153–74. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2011.624643
   Google Scholar
• Silverthorne, C. 2001. Leadership effectiveness and personality: A cross cultural evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences 30:303–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Z., J. P. Adams, and E. Mininberg. 2003. Ideal schools for the 21st century: a comparative analysis of merican and hinese principals’ views and visions. Journal of School Leadership 13:199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., and C. E. Lance. 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3:4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A., and C. Dimmock. (Eds.) 2002. School leadership and administration: Adopting a cultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A., R. Hu, and H. Qian. 2012. Principal leadership in China: An initial review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23:369–99. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.678863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildy, H., and W. Louden. 2000. School restructuring and the dilemmas of principals’ work. Educational Management and Administration 28:173–84. doi: 10.1177/0263211X000282006
   Google Scholar
• Witziers, B., R. J. Bosker, and M. L. Krüger. 2003. Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly 39:398–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., X. Gao, and J. P. Shen. 2017. School autonomy: A comparison between China and US. Chinese Education & Society, 50(3):284–305.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. Y. 2002. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar