Exploring the Effectiveness of a Measurement Error Tutorial in Helping Teachers Understand Score Report Results

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., & Gitomer, D. H. (2009). Transforming K-12 assessment: Integrating accountability testing, formative assessment and professional support. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Assessment issues of the 21st century (pp. 43–61). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., & Shepherd, M. J. (1982). Basic measurement proficiency of learning disability specialists. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, M., & Gleicher, M. (2014). Error bars considered harmful: Exploring alternate encodings for mean and error. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber = 6875915.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2007). Inference by eye: Pictures of confidence intervals and thinking about levels of confidence. Teaching Statistics, 29, 89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D. P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Student test score reports and interpretive guides: Review of current practices and suggestions for future research. Applied Measurement in Education, 17, 145–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., & Slater, S. (1997). Are NAEP executive summary reports understandable to policy makers and educators? (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 430). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Impara, J. C., Divine, K. P., Bruce, F. A., Liverman, M. R., & Gay, A. (1991). Does interpretive test score information help teachers? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, L. E., Bandalos, D. L., Eckhout, T. J., & Mickelson, K. (2004). Facilitating the development of assessment literacy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(2), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar, J., & Zwick, R. (2009). Multimedia presentations in educational measurement and statistics: Design considerations and instructional approaches. Journal of Statistics Education. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n3/sklar.html.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. S., Zapata-Rivera, D., & VanWinkle, W. (2010). An evidence-centered approach to using assessment data for policymakers (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-10-03). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., Hambleton, R. K., & Meara, K. (1999). Alternative displays for communicating NAEP results: A redesign and validity study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 301–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Rivera, D., & Katz, R. I. (2014). Keeping your audience in mind: Applying audience analysis to the design of interactive score reports. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21, 442–463. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.936357.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Rivera, D., VanWinkle, W., & Zwick, R. (2010, May). Exploring effective communication and appropriate use of assessment results through teacher score reports. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Rivera, D., VanWinkle, W., & Zwick, R. (2011, April). Exploring teachers' understanding and use of assessment results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K. (2012). Developing test score reports that work: The process and best practices for effective communication. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(2), 21–26. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00231.x.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R., & Sklar, J. C. (2011). Teaching teachers about test score interpretation: The ITEMS Project. In D. Zapata-Rivera & R. Zwick (Eds.), Improving test score reporting: Perspectives from the ETS Score Reporting Conference (ETS Research Rep. No. 11-45). (pp. 11–45). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R., Sklar, J., Wakefield, G., Hamilton, C., Norman, A., & Folsom, D. (2008). Instructional tools in educational measurement and statistics (ITEMS) for school personnel: Evaluation of three web-based training modules. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R., Zapata-Rivera, D., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Comparing graphical and verbal representations of measurement error in test score reports. Educational Assessment, 19, 116–138.
   Google Scholar