1,124
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Predictive Validity of SES Measures for Student Achievement

, &

References

  • Bond, M. H. (1991). Chinese values and health: A cultural-level examination. Psychology and Health, 5, 137–152. doi:10.1080/08870449108400417
  • Borstein, M. C., & Bradley, R. H. (Eds.). (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cirino, P. T., Chin, C. E., Sevcik, R. A., Wolf, M., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. D. (2002). Measuring socioeconomic status: Reliability and preliminary validity for different approaches. Assessment, 9, 145–155. doi:10.1177/10791102009002005
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943
  • Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 685–704. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x
  • Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. Oxford, England: Seminar Press.
  • Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540. doi:10.2307/1131278
  • Freedman, D. A. (2002). The ecological fallacy. Berkeley, California: University of California.
  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (2010). Questions and answers about ISEI-08. Retrieved from http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isco08/qa-isei-08.htm
  • Geronimus, A. T., & Bound, J. (1998). Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: Evidence from national samples. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148, 475–486. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009673
  • Geronimus, A. T., Bound, J., & Neidert, L. J. (1996). On the validity of using census geocode characteristics to proxy individual socioeconomic characteristics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 529–537. doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476918
  • Harwell, M. R. (2018). Don’t expect too much: The limited usefulness of common SES measures and a prescription for change. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/SES
  • Harwell, M. R., Maeda, Y., Lee, K., & Xie, A. (2017). The surprisingly modest relationship between SES and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 85, 197–214. doi:10.1080/00220973.2015.1123668
  • Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Generalized additive models. Statistical Science, 1, 297–318. doi:10.1214/ss/1177013604
  • International Labour Organization (ILO). (2007). Resolution concerning updating the international standard classification of occupations. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/docs/resol08.pdf
  • Jeynes, W. H. (2002). The challenge of controlling for SES in social science and education research. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 205–221. doi:10.1023/A:1014678822410
  • Krieger, N., Williams, D. R., & Moss, N. (1997). Measuring social class in U.S. public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 341–378. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341
  • Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1038
  • Lee, J. (2014). Conducting cognitive interviews in cross-national settings. Assessment, 21, 227–240. doi:10.1177/1073191112436671
  • Lee, J., & Stankov, L. (2018). Non-cognitive predictors of academic achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 50–64. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.009
  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 20, 133–151. doi:10.1177/0022022189202002
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.
  • Marra, G., & Wood, S. N. (2011). Practical variable selection for generalized additive models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55, 2372–2387. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.02.004
  • Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W. J. Van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101–122). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Mueller, C. W., & Parcel, T. L. (1981). Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. Child Development, 52, 13–30. doi:10.2307/1129211
  • Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 769–784. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4
  • OECD. (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world (Volume 1: Analysis). Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2009a). PISA data analysis manual SPSS® (2nd ed.). Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2009b). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I). Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Ostroff, C. (1993). Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 569–582. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.569
  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nielsen & Lydiche.
  • Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357. doi:10.2307/2087176
  • Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39, 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170
  • Sewell, W. H., Haller, A., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34, 82–92. doi:10.2307/2092789
  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417
  • Stankov, L. (2013). Noncognitive predictors of intelligence and academic achievement: An important role of confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 727–732. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.006
  • Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2009). Dimensions of cultural differences: Pancultural, etic/emic and ecological approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 339–354. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.003
  • Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2017). Self-Beliefs: Strong correlates of mathematics achievement and intelligence. Intelligence, 61, 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.12.001
  • Stankov, L., & Saucier, G. (2015). Social Axioms in 33 countries: Good replicability at the individual but less so at the country level. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 46, 296–315. doi:10.1177/0022022114558333
  • Stapleton, L. M., Yang, J. S., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Construct meaning in multilevel settings. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41, 481–520. doi:10.3102/1076998616646200
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Improving the measurement of socioeconomic status for the national assessment of educational progress: A theoretical foundation (NCES 2013-009). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/researchcenter/Socioeconomic_Factors.pdf
  • van de Gaer, E., Grisay, A., Schulz, W., & Gebhardt, E. (2012). The reference group effect: An explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 43, 1205–1228. doi:10.1177/0022022111428083
  • White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.