Visual Rhetorical Figures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Behavior: The Impact of Moderating Factors in a Spanish Language Context

References

• Barthes, R. 1977. “Rhetoric of the Image,” Image, Music, Text, translated by S. Heath. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text, translated by R. Miller. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, S. 1998. “The Translation Turn in Cultural Studies.” In Constructing Cultures. Essays on Literary Translation, edited by S. Bassnett, and A. Lefevere, 123–40. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Callister, M. A., and L. A. Stern. 2008. “Inspecting the Unexpected: Schema and the Processing of Visual Deviations.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by Edward F. McQuarrie, and Barbara J. Phillips, 137–158. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, E. 1990. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeRosia, E. D. 2008. “Rediscovering Theory: Integrating Ancient Hypotheses and Modern Empirical Evidence of the Audience-Response Effects of Rhetorical Figures,” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by E. F. McQuarrie, and B. J. Phillips, 35–51. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, C., and L. Rosenberg. 1990. “Visual and Verbal Metaphors: Developmental Interactions.” Child Development 61 (4):983–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. London, UK: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. 2008. “Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by Edward F. McQuarrie, and Barbara J. Phillips, 178–205. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1971. “The Information Available in Pictures.” Leonardo 4:27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, A. 2002. Why Bad Ads Happen to Good Causes. Santa Monica, CA: Cause Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Groupe M. U. 1992. Traité du Signe Visuel: Pour une Rhétorique de l'Image. Paris, France: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Huhmann, B. A. 2008. “A Model of the Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Rhetorical Works in Advertising.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by E. F. McQuarrie, and B. J. Phillips, 85–114. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, P. E., M. S. Van Gisberg, and J. W. Beentjes. 2008. “The Dark Side of Openness for Consumer Response.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by E. F. McQuarrie, and B. J. Phillips, 114–37. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, J. H. 1994. “The Use of Figures of Speech in Print Ad Headlines.” Journal of Advertising 23 (6):17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, T. 1983. “The Globalization of Markets.” Harvard Business Review 61 (3):92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, A., and J. Schilperoord. 2008. “Classifying Visual Rhetoric: Conceptual and Structural Heuristics.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by E. F. McQuarrie, and B. J. Phillips, 227–57. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., and D. Mick. 1996. “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (4):424–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., and D. Mick. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses.” Journal of Consumer Research 26 (1):37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., and D. Mick. 2003. “The Contribution of Semiotic and Rhetorical Perspectives to the Explanation of Visual Persuasion in Advertising.” In Persuasive Imagery: A Consumer Response Perspective, edited by L. M. Scott, and R. Batra, 191–221. Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F. 2008. “A Visit to the Rhetorician's Workbench: Developing a Toolkit for Differentiating Advertising Style.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by E. F. McQuarrie, and B. J. Phillips, 257–277. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie E. F., and B. J. Phillips, eds. 2008. New Directions in Advertising. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mick, D., and L. G. Politi. 1989. “Consumers Interpretations of Advertising Imagery: A Visit to the Hell of Connotation.” In SV-Interpretive Consumer Research, edited by E. C. Hirschman, 85–96. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mick, D., and C. Buhl. 1992. “A Meaning-Based Model of Advertising Experiences.” Journal of Consumer Research 19(2):317–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mothersbaugh, D. L., B. A. Huhmann, and G. R. Franke. 2002. “Combinatory and Separative Effects of Rhetorical Figures on Consumers' Effort and Focus in Ad Processing.” Journal of Consumer Research 28:589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooji, M. 2005. Consumer Behaviour and Culture: Consequences for Global Marketing and Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. 2001. “The ‘Cultural Turn’ in Social Theory: Towards a Theory of Cultural Politics.” Sociology 35:77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Nishida, H. 1999. “A Cognitive Approach to Intercultural Communication Based on Schema Theory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23:753–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama, R. 2000. “Visual Communication Across Cultures. A Study of Visual Semiotics in Japanese and British Advertiments.” Journal of Intercultural Communication 2000 (3). Accessed August 8, 2015. http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr3/oyama.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J. 1997.“Thinking Into It: Consumer Interpretation of Complex Advertising Images.” Journal of Advertising 26 (2):77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J. 2000. “The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Response to Image Ads.” Journal of Advertising 29 (1):15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J., and E. F. McQuarrie. 2004. “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 4:113–36.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L. 1994. “Bridge from Text to Mind: Adaptation of Reader-Response Theory.” Journal of Consumer Research 21:461–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spang, K. 1979. Fundamentos de Retórica. Pamplona, Spain: Eunsa.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sujan, M., J. R. Bettman, and H. Sujan. 1986. “The Effect of Brand Poisoning Strategies on Consumers' Brand Category Perceptions: Some Insights From Schema Research.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (4):454–67.
   Google Scholar
• Swasy, J. L., and . M. Munch. 1985. “Rhetorical Questions, Summarization Frequency and Argument Strength Effects on Recall.” Journal of Consumer Research 15:69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Toncar, M. F., and J. M. Munch. 2001. “Consumer Responses to Tropes in Print Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 30 (1):55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mulken, M. 2006. “Towards A New Typology for Visual and Textual Rhetoric in Print Advertisements.” European Advances in Consumer Research 7: 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K.-Y., and L. A. Peracchio. 2008. “Reading Pictures: Understanding the Stylistic Properties of Advertising Images.” In New Directions in Advertising, edited by E. F. McQuarrie, and B. J. Phillips, 205–27. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Warlaumont, H. 1995. “Advertising Images: From Persuasion to Polysemy.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 17 (Spring):19–31.
   Google Scholar