Consumer Sense Making of Political Front Group Messages

References

• Bradley, Samuel D., James R. Angelini, and Sungkyoung Lee. 2007. “Psychophysical and Memory Effects of Negative Political ADS: Aversive, Arousing and Well Remembered.” Journal of Advertising 36 (4):115–27. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367360409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell, W. 2017. “Qualitative Research in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 46 (1):36–47. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2016.1201025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, Brahim, Pieter de Pauw, Koen Ponnet, Michel Walrave, Karolien Poels, Verolien Cauberghe, and Liselot Hudders. 2019. “Considering Children’s Advertising Literacy from a Methodological Point of View: Past Practices and Future Recommendations.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 40 (2):196–213. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2018.1503109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassel, Carol A., and Celia C. Lo. 1997. “Theories of Political Literacy.” Political Behavior 19 (4):317–35. doi: 10.1023/A:1024895721905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, 130 S. Ct 876 – Supreme Court. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Confessore, Nicholas. 2015. “Koch Brothers’ Budget of $889 Million for 2016 Is on Par with Both Parties’ Spending.” The New York Times, January 26.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by David E. Apter. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., and Kent L. Tedin. 1995. American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact. 5th. ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Nathaniel J., and Mariea Grubbs Hoy. 2016. “Parents’ Perceived Persuasion Knowledge of Children’s Advergames: The Influence of Advertising Disclosure Modality and Cognitive Load.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 37 (2):145–64.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, Marian, and Peter Wright. 1994. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1):1–31. doi: 10.1086/209380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurwitsch, A. 1974. Phenomenology and the Theory of Science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, Eric. 1996. “Organization as Source: Consumers’ Understandings of Organizational Sponsorship of Advocacy Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 25 (2):19–36. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1996.10673497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, Eric, Ronald E. Taylor, and Margaret Morrison. 2014. “How Advertising Creatives Define Effective account Planning.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 35 (2):167–89. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2014.900271.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Nicholas Valentino. 2000. “Who Says What? Source Credibility as a Moderator of Campaign Advertising.” In Elements of Reason: Cognitive, Choice and The Bounds of Rationality, edited by Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel Popkin, 108–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Kim F., and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review 93 (4):877–99. doi: 10.2307/2586118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3):480–98. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.108.3.480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariscy, Ruth Ann Weaver, and Spencer F. Tinkham. 1999. “The Sleeper Effect and Negative Political Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 28 (4):13–30. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1999.10673593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Jinhee, and Eric Haley. 2014. “The Effects of Persuasion Knowledge on Consumer Responses to Green Advertising: Focus on Skepticism and Moderator.” Presented at the National Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Atlanta, GA, March.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Malmelin, Nando. 2010. “What Is Advertising Literacy? Exploring the Dimensions of Advertising Literacy.” Journal of Media Literacy 29 (2):129–42.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. 1988. The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, Hugo, and Helen Landemore. 2012. “Reasoning If for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation.” Political Psychology 33 (2):243–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Michelle. 2016. “Developing Persuasion Knowledge by Teaching Advertising Literacy in Primary School.” Journal of Advertising 45 (2):169–82. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2015.1107871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Michelle, Lucy Atkinson, Mark A. Rademacher, and Regina Ahn. 2017. “How Media and Family Build Children’s Persuasion Knowledge.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 38 (2):165–83. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2017.1291383.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon Is Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2):175–220.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, Vol 19, 123–205. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, Bruce E., Nam-Hyun Um, and Erica W. Austin. 2002. “An Exploration of the Effects of Negative Political Advertising on Political Decision Making.” Journal of Advertising 31 (1):13–25. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senechal, Monique, Jo-Anne LeFevre, Brenda L. Smith-Chant, and Karen V. Colton. 2001. “On Refining Theoretical Model of Emergent Literacy: The Role of Empirical Evidence.” Journal of School Psychology 39 (5):439–60. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00081-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, Esther, Samuel Tham, Weiyue Chen, and Vamsi Kanuri. 2019. “Exposure to Presidential Candidate Advertising on Television, Websites and Social Media during 23 Days of the 2016 Primaries.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 40 (1):75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkham, Spencer F., and Ruth Ann Weaver-Lariscy. 1991. “Advertising Message Strategy in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: Its Impact on Election Outcomes.” Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13 (1-2):207–26. doi: 10.1080/01633392.1991.10504966.
   Google Scholar