References
- Academic Senate for California Community Colleges. (2013). Sound principles for faculty evaluation. Academic Senate for California Community Colleges. Sacramento, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.asccc.org/sites/default/files/publications/Principles-Faculty-Evaluation2013_0.pdf
- Andrews, H., Harris, B., & Licata, C. (2002). Faculty evaluation: Strengths and concerns. Community College Enterprise, 8(1), 27–36. Retrieved from http://www.schoolcraft.edu/a-z-index/community-college-enterprise#.V1WJoNkrLIU
- Atasoylu, A. A., Wright, S. M., Beasley, B. W., Cofrancesco, J., Macpherson, D. S., Partridge, T., … Bass, E. B. (2003). Promotion criteria for clinician‐educators. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(9), 711–716. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10425.x
- Bloesser, B. (1974). Foothill college faculty senate professional development program. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED095951.pdf
- Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
- Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2014). Contingent commitments: Bringing part-time faculty into focus (A special report from the Center for Community College Student Engagement). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Program in Higher Educational Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.ccsse.org/docs/PTF_Special_Report.pdf
- Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
- Harrell, A., & Schormann, R. (1983). In-house course work for salary step credits: The program at McLennan Community College. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED236729.pdf
- Interaction Associates. (2010). Facilitative leadership: Tapping the power of participation. Cambridge, MA: Author.
- Johnston, P. C., Schimmel, T., & O’Hara, H. (2012). Revisiting the AAUP recommendation: The viability of collegiality as a fourth criterion for university faculty evaluation. College Quarterly, 15(1). Retrieved from http://collegequarterly.ca/2012-vol15-num01-winter/johnston-schimmel-ohara.html
- Macdonald, R. H., & Kemp, K. M. (1996). Teaching portfolios and their use in assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 44(4), 395–400. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-44.4.395
- Maryland Association of Community Colleges. (2014). 2014 databook. Retrieved from http://www.mdacc.org/PDFs/Publications/Databook/FY2014/2014_Databook.pdf
- Maryland Higher Education Commission. (2016). 2016 data book. Retrieved from http://www.mhec.maryland.gov/publications/research/AnnualPublications/2016Databook.pdf
- McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Peterman, D. S. (2001). Models for faculty evaluation and promotion in the community college. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 9(1), 75–77. Retrieved from http://www.montezumapublishing.com/jarcc1/aboutus.aspx
- Pyle, E. (2014). Out with the old and in with the new: One university department’s experience with revisions of the tenure-and-promotion policy. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators, 81(8), 19–26.
- Sain, B., & Williams, M. R. (2009). An examination of the use of portfolios for faculty evaluation at community colleges. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 17(1), 56–59. Retrieved from http://www.montezumapublishing.com/jarcc1/aboutus.aspx
- Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stumpf, D., King, S., Blendinger, J., & Davis, E. (2013). Ethical perspectives on evaluating community college faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(3), 168–176. doi:10.1080/10668926.2013.739509
- Townsend, B. K., & Twombly, S. (2007). Community college faculty: Overlooked and undervalued. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(6), 1–163. doi:10.1002/aehe.3206
- Wieman, C. (2015, January/February). A better way to evaluate undergraduate teaching. Change. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2015.996077
- Wiese, G. C., Percuoco, R. E., Pickar, J. G., Duray, S. M., Faruqui, S. R., Schmiedel, G. O., & McLean, I. D. (2007). Development of an evidence-based application and rubric for evaluating applicants’ qualifications for promotion to professor. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 30(7), 527–535. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.07.007