990
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Two Sides of the Same Coin? Analysis of Faculty and Administrators’ Perspectives on Governance

&

References

  • Alfred, R. L. (2008). Governance in strategic context. New Directions for Community Colleges, (141), 5–14.
  • Amey, M. J., Jessup-Anger, E., & Jessup-Anger, J. (2008). Community college governance: What matters and why?. New Directions for Community Colleges, (141), 5–14. doi:10.1002/cc.310
  • Basham, M. J., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). A comparative analysis between researchers, innovative practitioners, and department chairs of critical issues for turnaround leadership in community college instructional programs and services, 2010 and beyond. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35(1–2), 50–60. doi:10.1080/10668926.2011.528708
  • Benjamin, R., Carroll, S., Jacobi, M., Krop, C., & Shires, M. (1993). The redesign of governance in higher education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 5–22. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0741
  • Blackburn, R. (1998). A focus behavior: A theoretical perspective to refining behavior. Advances in Social Psychology, (94), 651–732.
  • Bray, N. J. (2003). Faculty perceptions of academic deans: Stakeholders, boundary-spanning, and social control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Bray, N. J. (2008). Proscriptive Norms for Academic Deans: Comparing Faculty Expectations Across Institutional and Disciplinary Boundaries. Journal Of Higher Education, 79(6), 692–721.
  • Charpentier, P. J. (2011). Faculty and administrators working together in a community college: A retrospective case study. (Order No. 3484677, The University of Maine). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 245. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/906488319?accountid=14472. . (prod.academic_MSTAR_906488319).
  • Churchman, D. (2006). Institutional commitments, individual compromises: Identity-related responses to compromise in an Australian university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/13600800500283676
  • Del Favero, M. (2003). Faculty-administrator relationships as integral to high-performing governance systems: New frameworks for study. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(7), 902–922. doi:10.1177/0002764202250119
  • Del Favero, M., & Bray, N. (2005). The faculty-administrator relationship: Partners in prospective governance? Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 3(1), 53–72.
  • Del Favero, M., & Bray, N. (2010). Herding cats and big dogs: Tensions in the faculty-administrator relationship. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 25, 477–542.
  • Dill, D., & Helm, K. (1988). Faculty participation in policy making. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 319–354). New York, USA: Agathon.
  • Dimond, J., & Lee, T. (1991). Faculty participation in institutional budgeting. New Directions for Higher Education, 1991(72), 168–178. doi:10.1002/he.36919917506
  • Downey J. (2000) Balancing corporation, collegium, and community. In M. C. Brown, II (Ed.), Organization and governance in higher education (5th ed., pp.305-312). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
  • Duggan, M. H. (2008). Noninstructional staff perceptions of the college climate. New Directions for Community Colleges, (144), 47–56. doi:10.1002/cc.324
  • Eckel, P. D. (2000). The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: Enabler or antagonist? The Review of Higher Education, 24, 15–39. doi:10.1353/rhe.2000.0022
  • Etzioni, A. (2000). Administrative and professional authority. In M. C. Brown II (Ed.), Organization and governance in higher education (5th ed., pp. 111–118). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
  • Fincher, C. (1986). The missing link in institutional evolution. Research in Higher Education, 17(1), 93–96. doi:10.1007/BF00973666
  • Fletcher, J. A., & Friedel, J. N. (2016). Typology of state-level community college governance structures. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(4–5), 311–322. doi:10.1080/10668926.2016.1251355
  • Florenthal, B., Tostikov-Mast, Y., & Yilmazsoy, N. B. (2009). Understanding organisational culture from multiple perspectives: Faculty-staff relations analysis. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 5(1), 31–43.
  • Grasmick, L., Davies, T. G., & Harbour, C. P. (2012). Participative leadership: Perspectives of community college presidents. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(2), 67–80. doi:10.1080/10668920802421496
  • Gray, S. (2015). Culture clash or ties that bind? What Australian academics think of professional staff. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(5), 545–557. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079397
  • Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic Restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, (39), 67–91. doi:10.1023/A:1003859026301
  • Hartley, M. (2010). Reconcilable differences: Conflict and collegiality in a unionized community college environment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34(4), 318–336. doi:10.1080/10668920701382427
  • Jones, S., Harvey, M., & Lefoe, G. (2014). A conceptual approach for blended leadership for tertiary education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(4), 418–429. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.916469
  • Kater, S., & Levin, J. S. (2004). Shared governance in the community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/10668920390276849
  • Kerr, C. (2001). The Uses of the university two decades later: Postscript 1982. Change, 14(7), 23–31. doi:10.1080/00091383.1982.9937006
  • Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(4), 1–147.
  • Kezar, A. (2004). What is more important to effective governance: Relationships, trust, and leadership, or structures and formal processes? New Directions for Higher Education, 75(127), 35–46. doi:10.1002/he.154
  • Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting today’s governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. Journal of Higher Education, 75(4), 371–399.
  • Lechuga, V. M. (2004). Exploring current issues on shared governance. New Directions for Higher Education, 25(127), 95–98. doi:10.1002/he.159
  • Lester, J., & Lukas, S. (2008). The actors behind the curtain: Representation of women faculty in community college institutional decision making. New Directions for Community Colleges, (142), 57–68. doi:10.1002/cc.325
  • Levin, J. S. (1998). Making sense of organizational change. New Directions for Community Colleges, (102), 43–54. doi:10.1002/cc.10205
  • Maassen, P. (2003). Shifts in governance arrangements: An interpretation of new management structures in higher education. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution (pp. 31–53). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • Miller, M.T. (2003). The Status of Faculty Senates In Community Colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27(5), 419-428.
  • Miller, M. T., Vacik, S. M., & Benton, C. (1998). Community college faculty involvement in institutional governance. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22(7), 645–654. doi:10.1080/1066892980220702
  • Peterson, M. W., & White, T. H. (1992). Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views or different models of organization? Research in Higher Education, 33(2), 177–204. doi:10.1007/BF00973578
  • Piland, W. E., & Bublitz, R. F. (1998). Faculty perceptions of shared governance in California community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22(2), 99–110. doi:10.1080/1066892980220201
  • Pope, M. L. (2004). A conceptual framework of faculty trust and participation in governance. New Directions for Higher Education, 38(127), 75–84. doi:10.1002/he.157
  • Porter, S. (2007). Organizational structure and climate. In: Dunnette, MD (Ed.) Handbook of organizational psychology. pp. 25-73, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Sullivan, L. G., Reichard, D. L., & Shumate, D. (2005). Using campus climate surveys to foster participatory governance. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(6), 427–443. doi:10.1080/10668920590934152
  • Taylor, P. A. (2001). Organizational change in a community college: A case study. (Order No. 3031625, Eastern Michigan University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 229–229 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/251722981?accountid=14472. (prod.academic_MSTAR_251722981).
  • Tierney, W., & Minor, J. (2003). Challenges for governance: A report by the center for higher education policy. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
  • Warwick, N. & Kennedy, T. (2009). Community College Governance Response: resetting community relations, Journal of Community Involvement, 12(4), 417-428

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.