Does the Type of Textbook Matter? Results of a Study of Free Electronic Reading Materials at a Community College

References

• Aagaard, L., Conner II., T. W., & Skidmore, R. L. (2014). College textbook reading assignments and class time activity. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 14, 132–145. doi:10.14434/josotl.v14i3.5031
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, A. (2013, January 27). Pay nothing? Easier said than done. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Can-Textbooks-Ever-Really-Be/136833/
   Google Scholar
• Baek, E., & Monaghan, J. (2013). Journey to textbook affordability: An investigation of students’ use of e-textbooks at multiple campuses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 14, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1237/2478
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2015). Words Onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. M. (1997). Beyond teaching & learning paradigms: Trekking into the virtual university. Teaching Sociology, 25, 1–14. doi:10.2307/1319107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, J. K., & Jacquemin, S. J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning Journal, 19. doi:10.24059/olj.v19i2.454
   Google Scholar
• Clark-Ibáñez, M., & Scott, L. (2008). Learning to teach online. Teaching Sociology, 36, 34–41. doi:10.1177/0092055X0803600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorado, J. T., & Eberle, J. (2010). Student demographic & success in online learning environments. Emporia State Research Studies, 46, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Learning. (2010). Copyright & open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Copyright_and_Open_Educational_Resources.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cragun, R. T. (2007). The future of textbooks? Electronic Journal of Sociology, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.sociology.org/content/2007/_cragun_futureoftextbooks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries, I. (2013). Evaluating open educational resources: Lessons learned. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 56–60. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.012
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance & satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40, 312–331. doi:10.1177/0092055X12446624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durwin, C. C., & Sherman, W. M. (2008). Does choice of college textbook make a difference in students’ comprehension? College Teaching, 56, 28–34. doi:10.3200/CTCH.56.1.28-34
   Google Scholar
• Everard, A., & St. Pierre, K. (2014). A case for student adoption of open textbooks. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 15, 66–76.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, A., Martin, M., Hudson, A., Warren, K., Hilton III., J., & Wiley, D. (2012). Open textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, L., Hilton III, J., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27, 159–172. doi:10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, N. A., & Howard, J. R. (2011). First contact: Teaching & learning in introductory sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grewe, K. E., & Davis, W. P. (2017). The impact of enrollment in an OER course on student learning outcomes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 1–5. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.2986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C. W., & Conway, K. M. (2014). Do prior online course outcomes provide more information than G.P.A. alone in predicting subsequent online course grades & retention? An observational study at an urban community college. Computers & Education, 72, 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, C., Reinsberg, S. A., & Rieger, G. (2017). The adoption of an open textbook in a large physics course: An analysis of cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 78–99. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton III, J., & Laman, C. (2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning, 27, 265–272. doi:10.1080/02680513.2012.716657
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. (2013, January 27). For many students, print is still king. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/For-Many-Students-Print-Is/136829/
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. R. (2005). An examination of student learning in introductory sociology at a commuter campus. Teaching Sociology, 33, 195–205. doi:10.1177/0092055X0503300206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D. (1997). Asynchronous learning: Technology & pedagogical strategy in a distance learning course. Teaching Sociology, 25, 262–277. doi:10.2307/1319295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahng, N., Krug, D., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Student achievement in online distance education compared to face-to-face education. European Journal of Open, Distance, & E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Jahng_Krug_Zhang.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jung, I., & Hong, S. (2016). Faculty members’ instructional priorities for adopting OER. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17, 28–43. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma, A., Kuzma, J., & Thiewes, H. (2013). Student perception of traditional versus alternative textbook value. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 10, 183–188. doi:10.19030/tlc.v10i3.7935
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of Documentation, 61, 700–712. doi:10.1108/00220410510632040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, E., Augustyniak, R., & Rees, A. (2002). Distance education as different education: A student-centered investigation of distance learning experience. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 43, 32–42. doi:10.2307/40323985
   Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512–519. doi:10.1002/acp.v27.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, K., Howery, C. B., Strand, K. J., Kain, E. L., & White Berheide, C. (2004). Liberal learning & the sociology major updated: Meeting the challenge of the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Medley-Rath, S. (2016). Considerations for selecting open education and open access readings. In TRAILS: Teaching resources and innovations library for sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Retrieved from http://trails.asanet.org
   Google Scholar
• OER Commons. (2017). Frequently asked questions: OER for k-12 educators. Retrieved from https://www.oercommons.org/static/staticpages/documents/FAQ-OER-K-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parry, M. (2013, January 27). Students get savvier about textbook buying. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Students-Get-Savvier-About/136827/
   Google Scholar
• Pisanski, T. (2013, June). Open access—Who pays? Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society. Retrieved from http://www.ems-ph.org/journals/newsletter/pdf/2013-06-88.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Price, L. (2006). Gender differences & similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 349–359. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259–266. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., & Baker, J. D. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, & interpersonal interactions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Van Hoof, B., & Pursel, B. (2013). An assessment of reading compliance decisions among undergraduate students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13, 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching of Psychology, 35, 2–5. doi:10.1177/009862830803500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenbruner, J. (2011). Electronic versus traditional textbooks: A comparison of college textbook formats. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Straumsheim, C. (2016, March 30). Publishers report digital sales overtaking print sales. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/03/30/publishers-report-digital-sales-overtaking-print-sales
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, S. (2015). Bodily dimensions of reading and writing practices on paper and digitally. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 766–775. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, T. (2014, July 8). College student still prefer print textbooks. Publishers Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/63225-college-students-prefer-a-mix-of-print-and-digital-textbooks.html
   Google Scholar
• The Trustees of Princeton University. (2010). The e-reader pilot at princeton. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/ereaderpilot/eReaderFinalReportShort.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, M., & Bahadir, F. (2014). Effect of screen reading and reading from printed out material on student success and permanency in introduction to computer lesson. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. (2013). College textbooks: Students have greater access to textbook information. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/655066.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Virginia Darden School of Business. 2010. Darden shares results of kindle experiment. Retrieved July 11, 2013, from http://www.darden.virginia.edu/web/Media/Darden-News-Articles/2010/Darden-Shares-Results-of-Kindle-Experiment/.
   Google Scholar
• Urtel, M. G. (2008). Assessing academic performance between traditional & distance education course formats. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 322–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wästlund, E. (2007). Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory & mental workload in complex cognition. PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/4693
   Google Scholar
• Winitzky-Stephens, J., & Pickavance, J. (2017). Open educational resources and student course outcomes: A multilevel analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 35–49. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski, A., & Palmer, L. B. (2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 8, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer82/wojciechowski82.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M., & Chen, S. (2011). Graduate students’ usage of & attitudes towards e-books: Experiences from taiwan. Program: Electronic & Library Information Systems, 45, 294–307. doi:10.1108/00330331111151601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online & face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students & academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 633–659. doi:10.1080/00221546.2014.11777343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R. O. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 157–172. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2001, May 11). A university that reveres tradition experiments with e-books. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/A-University-That-Reveres/107997
   Google Scholar