Understanding millennial learning in academic libraries: Learning styles, emerging technologies, and the efficacy of information literacy instruction

References

• Allcock, Sarah J., and Julie A. Hulme. 2010. “Learning Styles in the Classroom: Educational Benefit or Planning Exercise?” Psychology Teaching Review 16 (2):67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Charles H. 2012. “Student Values and Research: Are Millennials Really Changing the Future of Reference and Research?” Journal of Library Administration 52 (6–7):474–97. doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.707948.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Kevin. 2017. Game on!: Gamification, Gameful Design, and the Rise of the Gamer Educator. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Steven. 2015. “Connecting Higher Ed Trends to the Academic Library.” Library Journal, Accessed April 23. http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2015/04/opinion/steven-bell/connecting-higher-ed-trends-to-the-academic-library-from-the-bell-tower/.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Steven, and John Shank. 2004. “The Blended Librarian: A Blueprint for Redefining the Teaching and Learning Role of Academic Librarians.” College & Research Libraries News 65 (7):372–75.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Alison. 2010. “Gen Y: Who They Are and How They Learn.” Educational Horizons 88 (2):92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bladek, Marta, and Karen Okamoto. 2014. “What’s Theory Got to Do with It? Applying Educational Theory and Research to Revamp Freshman Library Workshops.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 21 (1):19–36. doi:10.1080/10691316.2012.652551.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Simon. 2004. “Learning Styles: An Overview of Theories, Models, and Measures.” Educational Psychology 24 (4):419–44. doi:10.1080/0144341042000228834.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperstein, Susan E., and Elizabeth Kocevar-Weidinger. 2004. “Beyond Active Learning: A Constructivist Approach to Learning.” Reference Services Review 32 (2):141–48. doi:10.1108/00907320410537658.
   Google Scholar
• DeWall, Nichole. 2016. “Millennials by Heart: Memorization as an Active Learning Strategy for the “SparkNotes” Generation.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 27 (4):77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle, Peter E., and David Hicks. 2003. “Constructivism as a Theoretical Foundation for the Use of Technology in Social Studies.” Theory & Research in Social Education 31 (1):72–104. doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Kenneth, Rita Dunn, and Gary Price. 1989. Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Luna, Juan M., Juan F. Huete, Andrew MacFarlane, and Efthimis N. Efthimiadis. 2009. “Teaching and Learning in Information Retrieval.” Information Retrieval 12 (2):201–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Neil. 2011. “VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles.” Accessed March 3, 2018. http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, Sandy. 2004. “Learning and Teaching: The Reciprocal Link.” Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 35 (2):74–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeland, Russell. 1990. “WonderWorks.” Data Based Advisor 8 (3), 146–48.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Peggy, and Robert Alley. 1984. “Learning/Teaching Styles: Applying the Principles.” Theory into Practice 23 (1):77–81. doi:10.1080/00405848409543093.
   Google Scholar
• Garris, Rosemary, Robert Ahlers, and James E. Driskell. 2002. “Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model.” Simulation & Gaming 33 (4):441–67. doi:10.1177/1046878102238607.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, James Paul. 2003. What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, Sarah. 2012. “Make Your Library Instruction Interactive with Poll Everywhere.” College & Research Libraries News 73 (7):400–3.
   Google Scholar
• Giordani, Pattie. 2005. “'Y' Recruiting: New Generation Inspires New Methods.” NACE Journal 65 (4):23–5.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, Diane F., and Milton D. Hakel. 2003. “Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond: Teaching for Long-term Retention and Transfer.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 35 (4):36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Hui-Yin, and Shiangkwei Wang. 2011. “The Impact of Using Blogs on College Students' Reading Comprehension and Learning Motivation.” Literacy Research and Instruction 50 (1):68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter Revell, Susan, and Mary K. McCurry. 2010. “Engaging Millennial Learners: Effectiveness of Personal Response System Technology with Nursing Students in Small and Large Classrooms.” Journal of Nursing Education 49 (5):272–75. doi:10.3928/01484834-20091217-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, David A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel, Kate. 2002. “Teaching Information Literacy to Generation Y.” Journal of Library Administration 36 (1–2):195–217. doi:10.1300/J111v36n01_12.
   Google Scholar
• Margino, Megan. 2013. “Revitalizing Traditional Information Literacy Instruction: Exploring Games in Academic Libraries.” Public Services Quarterly 9 (4):333–41. doi:10.1080/15228959.2013.842417.
   Google Scholar
• Mariano, G. J., Doolittle, P., and Hicks, D. 2009. “Fostering Transfer in Multimedia Instructional Materials.” In Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning, edited by Robert Zheng, 237–58. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference/IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Justine, and Robin Ewing. 2008. “Power Up! Using Digital Gaming Techniques to Enhance Library Instruction.” Internet Reference Services Quarterly 13 (2–3):209–25.
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, Mark, and Emily Wolfinger. 2010. “Generations Defined.” Ethos 18 (1):8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Adam. 2011. “Mind the Gap: Technology, Millennial Leadership and the Cross-generational Workforce.” Australian Library Journal 60 (1):54–65. doi:10.1080/00049670.2011.10722556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotney, Amy. 2010. “Engaging the Millennial Learner.” Monitor on Psychology 41 (3):60–3.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Parker. 1998. The Courage to Teach: Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher’s Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, Harold, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer, and Robert Bjork. 2009. “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9 (3):105–19. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2015. “The Whys and Hows of Generations Research.” Accessed January 16, 2018. http://www.people-press.org/2015/09/03/the-whys-and-hows-of-generations-research/
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, Marc. 2005. Engaging the Digital Learner. Brooklyn Park, MN: Minnesota State Colleges & Universities iTeach Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Christy. 2009. “Why Don’t My Students Think I’m Groovy?: The New “R”s for Engaging Millennial Learners.” Essays from Excellence in Teaching 9 (6):29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, Steve. 2007. “A Teaching Elixir, Learning Chimera or Just Fool’s Gold? Do Learning Styles Matter?” Support for Learning 22 (1):24–30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9604.2007.00441.x.
   Google Scholar
• Redick, Thomas S., and Randall W. Engle. 2006. “Working Memory Capacity and Attention Network Test Performance.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (5):713–21. doi:10.1002/acp.1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, April, Ofelia M. Littrell, Sandra Challman, and Pamela Stein. 2011. “Using Text Messaging in and Undergraduate Nursing Course.” Journal of Nursing Education 50 (2):99–104. doi:10.3928/01484834-20101230-04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechmann, Sheryl Wetter, and Anthony F. Grasha. 1974. “A Rational Approach to Developing and Assessing the Construct Validity of a Student Learning Style Scales Instrument.” Journal of Psychology 87 (2):213–23. doi:10.1080/00224545.1972.9922514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riener, Cedar, and Daniel Willingham. 2010. “The Myth of Learning Styles.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42 (5):32–5. doi:10.1080/00091383.2010.503139.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Donna M. 1996. User's Guide for the Learning-style Inventory: A Manual for Teachers and Trainers. Boston, MA: McBer.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J. 1988. “Mental Self-government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development.” Human Development 31 (4):197–224. doi:10.1159/000275810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, William, and Neil Howe. 1991. Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, Richard T. 2005. “Reinventing Library Buildings and Services for the Millennial Generation.” Library Administration & Management 19 (4):165–75.
   Google Scholar
• Tekulve, Nicole, Chapel Cowden, and Jaime Myers. 2015. “The Game of Research: [Board] Gamification of Library Instruction.” The Journal of Creative Library Practice 9. Accessed December 21, 2017. http://creativelibrarypractice.org/2015/09/
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Carol Ann. 2000. “Reconcilable Differences? Standards-Based Teaching and Differentiation.” Educational Leadership 58 (1):6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautmann, Nancy M. 2008. “Learning to Teach: Alternatives to Trial by Fire.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 40 (3):40–45. doi:10.3200/CHNG.40.3.40-46.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, Jean M. 2014. Generation Me - Revised and Updated: Why Today's Young Americans are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled–And More Miserable than Ever Before. New York, NY: Atria Books.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2011. “Age and Sex Composition: 2010.” Accessed November 9, 2017. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf
   Google Scholar