Synergistic ultrasonic biophysical effect-responsive nanoparticles for enhanced gene delivery to ovarian cancer stem cells

References

• Abdalkader R, Kawakami S, Unga J, et al. (2017). The development of mechanically formed stable nanobubbles intended for sonoporation-mediated gene transfection. Drug Deliv 24:320–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonora M, Pinton P. (2014). The mitochondrial permeability transition pore and cancer: molecular mechanisms involved in cell death. Front Oncol 4:302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Du M, Yu J, et al. (2020). Nanobiohybrids: a synergistic integration of bacteria and nanomaterials in cancer therapy. BIO Integration 1:25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z-Y, Liang K, Qiu R-X. (2010). Targeted gene delivery in tumor xenografts by the combination of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction and polyethylenimine to inhibit survivin gene expression and induce apoptosis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cock I, Zagato E, Braeckmans K, et al. (2015). Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis. J Control Release 197:20–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cock I, Lajoinie G, Versluis M, et al. (2016). Sonoprinting and the importance of microbubble loading for the ultrasound mediated cellular delivery of nanoparticles. Biomaterials 83:294–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degors IMS, Wang C, Rehman ZU, Zuhorn IS. (2019). Carriers break barriers in drug delivery: endocytosis and endosomal escape of gene delivery vectors. Acc Chem Res 52:1750–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delalande A, Leduc C, Midoux P, et al. (2015). Efficient gene delivery by sonoporation is associated with microbubble entry into cells and the clathrin-dependent endocytosis pathway. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:1913–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan C-H, Lin C-Y, Liu H-L, Yeh C-K. (2017). Ultrasound targeted CNS gene delivery for Parkinson's disease treatment. J Control Release 261:246–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Liu H, Mayer M, Deng CX. (2012). Spatiotemporally controlled single cell sonoporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16486–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Kumon RE, Park J, Deng CX. (2010). Intracellular delivery and calcium transients generated in sonoporation facilitated by microbubbles. J Control Release 142:31–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira APA, Boucrot E. (2018). Mechanisms of carrier formation during clathrin-independent endocytosis. Trends Cell Biol 28:188–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldvari M, Chen DW, Nafissi N, et al. (2016). Non-viral gene therapy: gains and challenges of non-invasive administration methods. J Control Release 240:165–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan X, Guo Z, Wang T, et al. (2017). A pH-responsive detachable PEG shielding strategy for gene delivery system in cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules 18:1342–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfield B, Chen X, Watkins SC, Villanueva FS. (2016). Biophysical insight into mechanisms of sonoporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:9983–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaksonen M, Roux A. (2018). Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:313–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargaard A, Sluijter JPG, Klumperman B. (2019). Polymeric siRNA gene delivery – transfection efficiency versus cytotoxicity. J Control Release 316:263–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Y, Wang J, Xie C, et al. (2013). Glutathione-sensitive RGD-poly(ethylene glycol)-SS-polyethylenimine for intracranial glioblastoma targeted gene delivery. J Gene Med 15:291–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. (2014). Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 72:49–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow RS, Wan JMF, Yu ACH. (2015). Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles. J R Soc Interface 12:20150029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I, Oza AM. (2019). Epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet (London, England) 393:1240–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Condello S, Thomes-Pepin J, et al. (2017). Lipid desaturation is a metabolic marker and therapeutic target of ovarian cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 20:303–14.e305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Xu C-F, Iqbal S, et al. (2017). Responsive nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cascaded delivery of nucleic acids to cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 115:98–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liufu C, Li Y, Tu J, et al. (2019). Echogenic PEGylated PEI-loaded microbubble as efficient gene delivery system. Int J Nanomedicine 14:8923–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Peng X, Hou J, et al. (2017). Folic acid-functionalized polyethylenimine superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as theranostic agents for magnetic resonance imaging and PD-L1 siRNA delivery for gastric cancer. Int J Nanomedicine 12:5331–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering BDM, Juffermans LJM, van Wamel A, et al. (2009). Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ Res 104:679–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettlen M, Chen P-H, Srinivasan S, et al. (2018). Regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem 87:871–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Kim J, Herrera M, et al. (2019). Brief update on endocytosis of nanomedicines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 144:90–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik S, Gupta KC. (2013). Novel polyethylenimine-derived nanoparticles for in vivo gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 10:215–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin P, Han T, Yu ACH, Xu L. (2018). Mechanistic understanding the bioeffects of ultrasound-driven microbubbles to enhance macromolecule delivery. J Control Release 272:169–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Zhang C, Tu J, Zhang D. (2012). Microbubble-induced sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection in vitro at low acoustic pressures. J Biomech 45:1339–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. (2017). Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med 14:9–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley MK, Vermerris W. (2017). Recent advances in nanomaterials for gene delivery—a review. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 7:94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roovers S, Lajoinie G, De Cock I, et al. (2019b). Sonoprinting of nanoparticle-loaded microbubbles: unraveling the multi-timescale mechanism. Biomaterials 217:119250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roovers S, Deprez J, Priwitaningrum D, et al. (2019a). Sonoprinting liposomes on tumor spheroids by microbubbles and ultrasound. J Control Release 316:79–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo EJ, Kwon YW, Jang IH, et al. (2016). Autotaxin regulates maintenance of ovarian cancer stem cells through lysophosphatidic acid-mediated autocrine mechanism. Stem Cells 34:551–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva IA, Bai S, McLean K, et al. (2011). Aldehyde dehydrogenase in combination with CD133 defines angiogenic ovarian cancer stem cells that portend poor patient survival. Cancer Res 71:3991–4001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiropoulou PA, Christodoulou MS, Silvani A, et al. (2014). Chemical approaches to targeting drug resistance in cancer stem cells. Drug Discov Today 19:1547–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood E. (2015). Neuroscience. Can sound open the brain for therapies? Science 347:1186–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang Z, Yu G, et al. (2019a). Tumor-specific drug release and reactive oxygen species generation for cancer chemo/chemodynamic combination therapy. Adv Sci (Weinh) 6:1801986.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang S, Zhou Z, Wang Z, et al. (2019b). Gadolinium metallofullerene-based activatable contrast agent for tumor signal amplification and monitoring of drug release. Small 15:e1900691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan RS, Konstantinidis K, Wei A-C, et al. (2012). Bax regulates primary necrosis through mitochondrial dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:6566–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Du M, Yan F, Chen Z. (2019). Focused ultrasound improves NK-92MI cells infiltration into tumors. Front Pharmacol 10:326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chen Z, Du M, et al. (2018). Enhanced gene transfection efficiency by low-dose 25 kDa polyethylenimine by the assistance of 1.8 kDa polyethylenimine. Drug Deliv 25:1740–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Hu S, Jin Q, et al. (2017). Mff-dependent mitochondrial fission contributes to the pathogenesis of cardiac microvasculature ischemia/reperfusion injury via induction of mROS-mediated cardiolipin oxidation and HK2/VDAC1 disassociation-involved mPTP opening. J Am Heart Assoc 6:e005328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong X, Nephew KP. (2019). Ovarian cancer stem cells: role in metastasis and opportunity for therapeutic targeting. Cancers 11:934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar