“You Heard Me Swear but You Never Heard Me!” negotiating Agency in the pupil referral unit classroom

References

• Adams, J. (2010). Risky choices: The dilemmas of introducing contemporary art practices into schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(6), 683–701. doi:10.1080/01425692.2010.515110
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. (1997). A case study of the artist as teacher through the video work of Martha Davis. Studies in Art Education, 39(1), 37–56. doi:10.2307/1320718
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J., & Clarke, D. J. (2014). What is ‘agency’? Perspectives in science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 735–754. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.825066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (2008). Pedagogy against the state. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 27(3), 226–240. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2008.00581.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social-cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229. doi:10.1080/10508400903530044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. doi:10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., & White, J. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 667–682. doi:10.1080/01411920802224238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, A. (2011). Docile bodies or contested space? Working under the shadow of permanent exclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 303–316. doi:10.1080/13603110902829663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rosé, C. P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 27–39. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J., & Farrugia, D. (2014). Unpacking the black box: The problem of agency in the sociology of youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4), 461–474. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.830707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, M. (2004). The dynamic consultation: A discourse analytical study of doctor-patient communication (Vol. 128). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, T. (1991). Fraternal bonding in the locker room: A pro-feminist analysis of talk about competition and women. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 119–135. doi:10.1123/ssj.8.2.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (1990). Agency as a form of discursive practice. A classroom scene observed. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 341–361. doi:10.1080/0142569900110306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2017). Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2017. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/schools-pupils-and-their-characteristics-january-2017
   Google Scholar
• DiGiacomo, D. K., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2015). Relational equity as a design tool within making and tinkering activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 141–153. doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1058398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & D’Arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56(2), 147–155. doi:10.1080/0031910410001693236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Frankham, J., Edwards-Kerr, D., Humphrey, N., & Roberts, L. (2007). School exclusions: Learning partnerships outside mainstream education. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. M., Rowsell, J., Winters, K. L., Vietgen, P., McLauchlan, D., & McQueen-Fuentes, G. (2017). A reason to respond: Finding agency through the arts. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(25), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262. doi:10.1080/13639080.2014.900168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill, P., & Boyd, B. (2002). Equality, fairness and rights–The young person’s voice. British Journal of Special Education, 29(3), 111–117. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00252
   Google Scholar
• Harris, B., Vincent, K., Thomson, P., & Toalster, R. (2006). Does every child know they matter? pupils’ views of one alternative to exclusion. Pastoral Care in Education, 24(2), 28–38. doi:10.1111/past.2006.24.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Hart, N. (2013). What helps children in a pupil referral unit (PRU)? An exploration into the potential protective factors of a PRU as identified by children and staff. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 18(2), 196–212. doi:10.1080/13632752.2012.706905
   Google Scholar
• Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. London, UK: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, C. (2004). Re-presentation and resistance in the context of school exclusion: Reasons to be critical. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(5), 356–377. doi:10.1002/casp.798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, L. (2012). Video for peer feedback and reflection: Embedding mainstream engagement into learning and teaching practice. Research in Learning Technology, 2012 Supplement, 20, 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., Aro, M., & Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2015). Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, M., Vesterinen, O., Lipponen, L., Kopisto, K., Salo, L., & Krokfors, L. (2014). Students’ agency in an out-of-classroom setting: Acting accountably in a gardening project. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(1), 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, M. H. (2014). Agency as an empirical concept. An assessment of theory and operationalization (NIDI Working Paper 2014/9). Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute website Retrieved from https://www.nidi.nl/shared/content/output/papers/nidi-wp-2014-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2013). The dialogic construction of agency in classroom communities. In M. B. Ligorio & M. César (Eds.), Interplays between dialogical learning and dialogical self (pp. 193–218). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, N. (2011). What makes for a successful re-integration from a pupil referral unit to mainstream education? An applied research project. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(3), 213–226. doi:10.1080/02667363.2011.603530
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G., Stead, J., & Kendrick, A. (2003). Joined-up approaches to prevent school exclusion. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 8(1), 77–92. doi:10.1080/13632750300507007
   Google Scholar
• Mac an Ghaill, M. (1988). Young, gifted and black: Student teacher relations in the schooling of black youth. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5, 30–39. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1099
   Google Scholar
• Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 137–146. doi:10.1080/00461520902832384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (1978). Working class girls and the culture of femininity. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies Women’s Study Group, Women take issue: Aspects of Women’s Subordination. (pp. 96–108). London, UK: Hutchison.
   Google Scholar
• McSherry, J. (2012). Challenging behaviour in mainstream schools: Practical strategies for effective intervention and reintegration. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meo, A., & Parker, A. (2004). Teachers, teaching and educational exclusion: Pupil referral units and pedagogic practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(1), 103–120. doi:10.1080/1360311032000159465
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrandt, M. K., Felts, J., Richards, B., & Abghari, N. (2004). Teaching-to-learn: A constructivist approach to shared responsibility. Art Education, 57(5), 19–33. doi:10.1080/00043125.2004.11653563
   Google Scholar
• Munn, P., & Lloyd, G. (2005). Exclusion and excluded pupils. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 205–221. doi:10.1080/0141192052000340215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2011). Alternative provision: Education outside school. Retrieved from www.ofsted.gov.uk/publications/100233
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2016). Alternative provision: Progress made, but more still to be done. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/alternative-provision-progress-made-but-more-still-to-be-done
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, J., Dunbar-Krige, H., & Mostert, J. (2013). Learners with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties’ experiences of reintegration into mainstream education. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 18(3), 310–326. doi:10.1080/13632752.2013.769709
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. (2008). From resistance to involvement: Examining agency and control in a playworld activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(2), 115–140. doi:10.1080/10749030801970494
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. (2010). Lionhearts of the playworld. An ethnographic case study of the development of agency in play pedagogy (Doctoral dissertation). Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from Studies in Educational Sciences. (233)
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P., & Hilppö, J. (2017). The dialectics of agency in educational ethnography. Ethnography and Education, 12(1), 78–94. doi:10.1080/17457823.2016.1159971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2013). From ambivalence to agency: Becoming an author, an actor and a hero in a drama workshop. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(2), 111–125. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., Kumpulainen, K., Rainio, A. P., Hilppö, J., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Dealing with the contradiction of agency and control during dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 17–26. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., Martin, J., & Kumpulainen, K. (2016). Agency and learning: Researching agency in educational interactions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., & Rosenbaum, E. (2013). Designing for tinkerability. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 163–181). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, N. (2014). School workforce in England: November, 2013. London, UK: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rufo, D. (2012). Building forts and drawing on walls: Fostering student-initiated creativity inside and outside the elementary classroom. Art Education, 65(3), 40–47. doi:10.1080/00043125.2012.11519175
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (2008). From talk to action: Experiencing interlocution in developmental interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(3), 234–257. doi:10.1080/10749030802186769
   Google Scholar
• Schleef, E. (2008). Gender and academic discourse: Global restrictions and local possibilities. Language in Society, 37(4), 515–538. doi:10.1017/S0047404508080755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellman, E. (2009). Lessons learned: Student voice at a school for pupils experiencing social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 14(1), 33–48. doi:10.1080/13632750802655687
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. (2008). Making (electrical) connections: Exploring student agency in a school in India. Science Education, 92(2), 297–319. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y., & Rogers, C. (2001). Motivational patterns in disaffected school students: Insights from pupil referral unit clients. British Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 331–345. doi:10.1080/01411920120048331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, L. M., & Deasy, R. (2005). Third space: When learning matters. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2012). Improving alternative provision. Department for Education, London, UK: Crown Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. (2007). Working the in/visible geographies of school exclusion. In K. N. Gulson & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters (pp. 111–130). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, K., & Thomson, P. (2010). ‘Slappers like you don’t belong in this school’: The educational inclusion/exclusion of pregnant schoolgirls. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 371–385. doi:10.1080/13603110802504580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., Meadows, N. B., Drasgow, E., & Shriner, J. G. (2009). Evidence-based practices for educating students with emotional and behavioural disorders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar