An Examination of At-Risk College Freshmen's Expository Literacy Skills Using Interactive Online Writing Activities

References

• ACT. (2010). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college and work. Iowa City, IA: Retrieved from: http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/crisis_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved July 6, 2011, from www.ncsu.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Blasingame, J., & Bushman, J. H. (2005). Teaching writing in middle and secondary schools. Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, L. (2003). Teaching composition online: No longer the second best choice. KAIROS, 8.2. Retrieved from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/8.2/binder.html?praxis/blair.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.C. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B. N., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies, an International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Farnan, N. (1986). A reading-writing procedure that teaches expository paragraph structure. The Reading Teacher, 39, 556–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. (2006). Historically underserved students: What we know, what we still need to know. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2006(135), 21–28. doi:10.1002/cc.244.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, T. G. (2010). Assessing and correcting reading and writing difficulties (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kucer, S. B. (2009). The dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school setting (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open Press University.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. C. (2009). Reader response meets new literacies: Empowering readers in online learning communities. Reading Teacher, 62(8), 638–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I. (2001). Reciprocal themes in ESL reading and writing. In T. J. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Landmark essays on ESL writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Reading: The nation's report card. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, M. (2003). A brief history of computer support for writing centers and writing- across-the-curriculum programs. Computers and Composition, 20(4), 395–413.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (Eds). (2008). The mixed methods reader. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938/1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The Reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Raedts, M., van Steendam, E., Toorenaar, A. & van den Bergh, H. (2009). The role of readers in writing development: Writing students bringing their texts to the test. In R. Beard, J. Riley, D. Myhill & M. Nystrand (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 436–452). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey, N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7(2), 256–287. doi: 10.1177/0741088390007002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, N. (1997). The Constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2003). What's new in New Literacies Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(20), 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, G. E. (2005). Language arts: Patterns of practice (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, H., & Mongillo, G. (2007). Improving expository writing skills of preservice teachers in an online environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1).
   Google Scholar
• Wise, B. (2009). Adolescent literacy: The cornerstone of student success. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(5), 369–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar