Applying multiple frameworks to establish effective virtual collaborative teams in academia: a review and recommendations

References

• nsf.gov - NCSES collaboration in academic R&D: a decade of growth in pass-through funding - US national science foundation (NSF). [cited 2019 Feb 15]. https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20180503130236/https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf12325/
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin C, Patel KD, O’Callaghan T, et al. The use of virtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education: findings from an integrated review. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(2):136–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland CJ, Center BA, Finstad DA, et al. A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Acad Med. 2005;80(3):225–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder M, Pierce JR. Innovations in faculty development: study of a research assistance unit designed to assist clinician-educators with research. South Med J. 2011;104(9):647–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kichler K, Kozol R, Buicko J, et al. A structured step-by-step program to increase scholarly activity. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(6):e19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie DS. Expanding the view of scholarship: introduction. Acad Med. 2000;75(9):871–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective. Internet Higher Educ. 2010;13:5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ.1999;2(2–3):87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. Online community of inquiry review: social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. J Asynchronous Learn Networks. 2007;11(1):61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess ML, Slate JR, Rojas-LeBouef A, et al. Teaching and learning in second life: using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology. Int Higher Educ. 2010;13(1):84–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco J, Haavind S, Remold J, et al. Exploring differences in online professional development seminars with the community of inquiry framework. Educ Media Int. 2011;48(3):139–149.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes B. School teachers’ continuous professional development in an online learning community: lessons from a case study of an eTwinning learning event. Eur J Educ. 2013;48(1):97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea P, Hayes S, Vickers J, et al. A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: social network and content analysis. Int Higher Educ. 2010;13(1):10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorner H, Karpati A. Mentoring for innovation: key factors affecting participant satisfaction in the process of collaborative knowledge construction in teacher training. J Asynchronous Learn Networks. 2010;14(4):63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Akyol Z, Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, et al. A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. J Distance Educ. 2009;23(2):123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Pecka SL, Kotcherlakota S, Berger AM. Community of inquiry model: advancing distance learning in nurse anesthesia education. Aana J. 2014;82(3):212–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber TC. The online crit: the community of inquiry meets design education. J Distance Educ. 2011;25(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ST Perceptions of online TESOL teacher education: strengths, weaknesses, characteristics, and effective components. 2012 [cited 2019 Feb 14]. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/118535/
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E Communities of practice: learning as a social system. https://thesystemsthinker.com/communities-of-practice-learning-as-a-social-system/
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. Cultivating communities of practice. 1st ed. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Review Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Connect and inspire: online communities of practice in education. LINCS | Adult Education and Literacy | U.S. Department of Education. [cited 2019 May 8]. https://lincs.ed.gov/professional-development/resource-collections/profile-706
   Google Scholar
• Barnett S, Jones SC, Bennett S, et al. General practice training and virtual communities of practice - a review of the literature. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Zarco AI, González-González I, Saigí-Rubió F, et al. The co-learning process in healthcare professionals: assessing user satisfaction in virtual communities of practice. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51:1303–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew N, Ferguson D, Wilkie G, et al. Developing professional identity in nursing academics: the role of communities of practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(6):607–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldberg K, Mackness J. Foundations of communities of practice: enablers and barriers to participation. J Comput Assist Learn. 2009;25(6):528–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trust T. Deconstructing an online community of practice: teachers’ actions in the edmodo math subject community. J Digital Learn Teach Educ. 2015;31(2):73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim L. Learning theory and online technologies. 2nd ed. New York, London: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim L. Assessing online collaborative learning: a theory, methodology, and toolset. Flexible Learn Inf Soc. 2007;282–293. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch027.
   Google Scholar
• Hord S Preface - professional learning communities: communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. [ cited Feb 14 2019]. http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change34/
   Google Scholar
• DuFour R. What is a professional learning community? - Educational leadership. Educ Leadersh. 2004;61(8):6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blitz CL Can online learning communities achieve the goals of traditional professional learning communities? What the literature says. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance; 2013. p. 37.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell TJ, Parker JM, Eberhardt J, et al. Virtual professional learning communities: teachers’ perceptions of virtual versus face-to-face professional development. J Sci Educ Technol. 2013;22(3):267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty TM, Heafner TL, Farinde A, et al. Windows into teaching and learning: professional growth of classroom teachers in an online environment. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 2015;24(3):375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M-H, Kleinsasser RC. Fostering online professional development between EFL preservice and inservice teachers: affordances and challenges. English Teach Learn. 2014;38(2):29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Miller HR, Herbert B, et al. Using a wiki in a scientist-teacher professional learning community: impact on teacher perception changes. J Sci Educ Technol. 2012;21(4):440–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akl EA, Meerpohl JJ, Raad D, et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E602–E612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28(6):497–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crites G, Kay D, Gaines J, et al. Technologies that facilitate distance collaboration brief: a state of the technology (as of October 2014).; 2014 [cited 2019 Feb 14]. https://icollaborative.aamc.org/resource/3887/
   Google Scholar
• Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012;60(5):768–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development. Adventure associates. [ Published 2017 Mar 20; cited 2019 Feb 15]. https://www.adventureassoc.com/tuckmans-stages-of-group-development/
   Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar