The impact of patient narratives on medical students’ perceptions of shared decision making: A randomized controlled trial

References

• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1). 1
   Google Scholar
• Keirns CC, Goold SD Patient-centered care and preference-sensitive decision making. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;302(16):1805–1806.
   Google Scholar
• Veroff D, Marr A, Wennberg DE Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler TM, Nachbur BH, Kessler W Patients’ perception of preoperative information by interactive computer program - exemplified by cholecystectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;59(2):135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mira JJ, Tomás O, Virtudes-Pérez M, et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009;145(5):536–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaschning K, Körner M, Wirtz M Analyzing the effects of shared decision-making, empathy and team interaction on patient satisfaction and treatment acceptance in medical rehabilitation using a structural equation modeling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, et al. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge M, Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):316–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jukic M, Kozina S, Kardum G, et al. Physicians overestimate patient’s knowledge of the process of informed consent: a cross-sectional study. Med Glas. 2011;8(1):39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Steiner JF Patient treatment preferences in localized prostate carcinoma: the influence of emotion, misconception, and anecdote. Cancer. 2006;107(3):620–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherlock A, Brownie S Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(4):207–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):291–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politi MC, Clark MA, Ombao H, et al. Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making? Heal Expect. 2011;14(1):84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr KA, Fagerlin A, Hofer T, et al. Physician recommendations trump patient preferences in prostate cancer treatment decisions. Med Decis Mak. 2017;37(1):56–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggeling M, Bientzle M, Cress U, et al. The impact of physicians’ recommendations on treatment preference and attitudes: a randomized controlled experiment on shared decision-making. Psychol Heal Med. 2020;25(3):259–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel R, Traut-Mattausch E, Frey D, et al. Do physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options? Heal Expect. 2012;15(1):23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Br Med J. 2006;333(7565). 7565
   Google Scholar
• Winterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, et al. Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):2079–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazor KM, Baril J, Dugan E, et al. Patient education about anticoagulant medication: is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective? Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):145–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer VA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids. Med Decis Mak. 2013;33(1):4–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer VA, Tomek S, Hulsey L The Effect of Narrative Information in a Publicly Available Patient Decision Aid for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Health Commun. 2014;29(1):64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikeland H, Ørnes K, Finset A, et al. The physician’s role and empathy – a qualitative study of third year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:165. 1 doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-165
   Google Scholar
• Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, et al. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1171–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(606):76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt B, LeLacheur SF, Galinsky AD, et al. Does perspective-taking increase patient satisfaction in medical encounters? Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1445–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diouf NT, Menear M, Robitaille H, et al. Training health professionals in shared decision making: update of an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(11):1753–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coret A, Boyd K, Hobbs K, et al. Patient Narratives as a Teaching Tool: a Pilot Study of First-Year Medical Students and Patient Educators Affected by Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(3):317–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Player E, Gure-Klinke H, North S, et al. Humanising medicine: teaching on tri-morbidity using expert patient narratives in medical education. Educ Prim Care. 2019;30(6):368–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow R, Crocker J, Talbot K, et al. Does hearing the patient perspective improve consultation skills in examinations ? An exploratory randomized controlled trial in medical undergraduate education. Med Teach. 2016;38(12):1229–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuepbach WMM, Rau J, Knudsen K, et al. Neurostimulation for Parkinson’s disease with early motor complications. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(7):610–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften & Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie – Idiopathisches Parkinsonsyndrom. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/030-010l_S3_Parkinson_Syndrome_Idiopathisch_2016-06.pdf. Published 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Østergaard K, Sunde NA Evolution of Parkinson’s disease during 4 years of bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Mov Disord. 2006;21(5):624–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Jeon B Decision under risk: argument against early deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Park Relat Disord. 2019;69(October):7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Weernink MGM, Van Til JA, JPP VV, et al. Involving patients in weighting benefits and harms of treatment in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bientzle M, Kimmerle J, Eggeling M, et al. Toward evidence-based decision aids for patients with Parkinson’s disease: protocol for an interview study, an online survey, and two randomized controlled trials. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 9 7 https://doi.org/10.2196/17482
   Google Scholar
• Hamberg K, Hariz G-M The decision-making process leading to deep brain stimulation in men and women with parkinson’s disease - an interview study. BMC Neurol. 2014;14(1). 1
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa ER, Cury RG Tailoring the deep brain stimulation indications in Parkinson’s disease. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2018;76(6):359–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange M, Mauerer J, Schlaier J, et al. Underutilization of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease? A survey on possible clinical reasons. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(5):771–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt B, Shiozawa T, Herlan S, et al. Surgical prosection in a traditional anatomical curriculum-Tübingens’ Sectio chirurgica. Ann Anat. 2010;192(6):349–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosser J, Bientzle M, Shiozawa T, et al. Acquiring Clinical Knowledge from an Online Video Platform: a Randomized Controlled Experiment on the Relevance of Integrating Anatomical Information and Clinical Practice. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(5):478–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiozawa T, Butz B, Herlan S, et al. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students’ academic performance in applied clinical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(1):46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King VJ, Davis MM, Gorman PN, et al. Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians. Med Decis Mak. 2012;32(4):636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse, A. H., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Montori, V. M. (2019). Shared decision making and the importance of time. J Am Med Assoc., 322(1), 25-26.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Christian, J. (2003). From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour. Current Psychology, 22(3), 187-195.
   Google Scholar