Reflections on project ECHO: qualitative findings from five different ECHO programs

References

• Arora S, Geppert CMA, Kalishman S, et al. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: project ECHO. Acad Med. 2007;82(2):154–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, et al. Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment–Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology. 2010;52(3):1124–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis E, Kraschnewski J, Hogentogler R, et al. 4060 A telehealth approach to improving healthcare to rural and underserved populations. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020;4(S1):56.
   Google Scholar
• UNM. Become an ECHO hub: run your own ECHO programs. University of New Mexico, ECHO Institute. 2021. Available from: https://hsc.unm.edu/echo/get-involved/start-a-hub/. Cited 2021 Mar 10.
   Google Scholar
• Arora S, Kalishman SG, Thornton KA, et al. Project ECHO: a telementoring network model for continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017;37(4):239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agley J, Adams ZW, Hulvershorn LA. Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) as a tool for continuing medical education on opioid use disorder and comorbidities. Addiction. 2019;114(3):573–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty M, Rayala S, Evans E, et al. Using virtual learning to build pediatric palliative care capacity in South Asia: experiences of implementing a teleteaching and mentorship program (Project ECHO). JCO Glob Oncol. 2021;7:210–222.
   Google Scholar
• UNM. ECHO impact and initiatives: touching one billion lives by 2025. University of New Mexico, ECHO Institute. 2021. Available from: https://hsc.unm.edu/echo/echos-impact/. Cited 2021 Mar 10.
   Google Scholar
• Catic AG, Mattison MLP, Bakaev I, et al. ECHO-AGE: an innovative model of geriatric care for long-term care residents with dementia and behavioral issues. J Am Med Direct Assoc. 2014;15(12):938–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri K, Haddad M, Anderson D. Project ECHO: replicating a novel model to enhance access to hepatitis C care in a community health center. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24(2):850–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JD, Unruh KT, Catlin MC, et al. Project ECHO: a model for complex, chronic care in the Pacific Northwest region of the USA. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(8):481–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman JG, Tomedi LE, Thornton K, et al. Innovative COVID-19 programs to rapidly serve New Mexico: project ECHO. Public Health Rep. 2021;136(1):39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, et al. The impact of Project ECHO on participant and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1439–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DE, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBain RK, Sousa JL, Rose AJ, et al. Impact of Project ECHO models of medical tele-education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2842–2857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek MO, Parker RA, Chan J, et al. Effectiveness of the Extension for Community Health Outcomes Model as applied to primary care for autism: a partial stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(5):e196306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas SA, Godino JG, Northrup A, et al. Effectiveness of a decentralized hub and spoke model for the treatment of hepatitis C virus in a federally qualified health center. Hepatol Commun. 2021;5(3):412–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faherty LJ, Rose AJ, Chappel A, et al. Assessing and expanding the evidence base for project ECHO and ECHO-like models: findings of a technical expert panel. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(3):899–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guetterman TC, Fetters MD, Creswell JW. Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):554–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyes J, Booth A, Moore G, et al. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(S1):e000893.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINT. Welcome to the Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT). 2021. Available from: https://motivationalinterviewing.org/. Cited 2021 Mar 3.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt MJ, Ferris JA, Lenton S. Hidden populations, online purposive sampling, and external validity: taking off the blindfold. Field Methods. 2014;27(1):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie L. Exchanging focus groups for individual interviews when collecting qualitative data. Nurse Res. 2019;27(2):e1633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, Namey E, Taylor J, et al. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2017;20(6):693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. An array of qualitative data analysis tools: a call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychol Quart. 2007;22(4):557–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded Theory. In: Smith JA, Harre R, VanLangenhove L, editors. Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage Publications; 1996. p. 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L. Using generic inductive approach in qualitative educational research: a case study analysis. J Educ Learn. 2016;5(2):129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Bikinesi L, O’Bryan G, Roscoe C, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce. Human Resources Health. 2020;18(1):61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheallaigh CN, O’Leary A, Keating S, et al. Telementoring with project ECHO: a pilot study in Europe. BMJ Innov. 2017;3(3):144–151.
   Google Scholar
• Tiyyagura G, Asnes AG, Leventhal JM, et al. Impact of Project ECHO on community ED providers’ perceptions of child abuse knowledge and access to subspecialists for child abuse and neglect. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19(8):985–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin L, Zhao J, Dubin R, et al. Project ECHO telementoring intervention for managing chronic pain in primary care: insights from a qualitative study. Pain Med. 2018;19(6):1140–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian AJ, Robinson S, Manzoor F, et al. A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs). Pilot Feasibil Stud. 2020;6:132.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin DJ, Cave M-T. Creating pedagogical spaces for developing doctor professional identity. Med Educ. 2008;42(8):765–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White C, Mcllfatrick S, Dunwoody L, et al. Supporting and improving community health services—a prospective evaluation of ECHO technology in community palliative care nursing teams. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015;9(2):202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman JG, Comerci G, Boyle JF, et al. Innovative telementoring for pain management: project ECHO pain. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014;34(1):68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantillo M, Starr T, Kreipe R. The recruitment and acceptability of a project ECHO eating disorders clinic: a pilot study of telementoring for primary medical and behavioral health care practitioners. Eat Disord. 2020;28(3):230–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan S, Carlin L, Zhao J, et al. Promoting an interprofessional approach to chronic pain management in primary care using Project ECHO. J Interprof Care. 2020;35(3):464-467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalloo C, Osei-Twum J-A, Rapoport A, et al. Pediatric Project ECHO: a virtual community of practice to improve palliative care knowledge and self-efficacy among interprofessional health care providers. J Palliat Med. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0496.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt R, Agley J, McNelis AM, et al. Assessing perceptions of interprofessional education and collaboration among graduate health professions students using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS). J Interprof Educ Pract. 2017;8:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Agley J, Henderson C, Adams Z, et al. Provider engagement in Indiana’s opioid use disorder ECHO programme: there is a will but not always a way. BMJ Open Qual. 2021;10(1):e001170.
   Google Scholar