Augmented reality in medical education: students’ experiences and learning outcomes

References

• Eckert M, Volmerg JS, Friedrich CM, et al. Augmented reality in medicine: systematic and bibliographic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/10967.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram P, Kishino F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual-displays. IEICE TRANS Inf Syst. 1994;E77d(12):1321–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez R. Educational strategies applied to the teaching of anatomy. The evolution of resources. Eur J Anat. 2019;11(S1):31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh R, Bohn R. Computer‐assisted instructions: a role in teaching human gross anatomy. Med Educ. 1990;24(6):499–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaas SS. Animating the curriculum: integrating multimedia into teaching. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994;82(2):133.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael SW, Pawlina W. Animated powerPoint as a tool to teach anatomy. The Anatomical Record: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists. The Anatomical Record. 2000;261(2):83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Baatz S Medical science and medical informatics: the visible human project 1986-2000. in the history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference, Medford, Information Today, 2004. New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle MD. The visible embryo project: embedded program objects for knowledge access, creation and management through the world wide web. Computerized Med Imaging Graphics. 1996;20(6):423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelease RB. The virtual anatomy practical: a stereoscopic 3D interactive multimedia computer examination program. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. linical Anatomy (New York). 1998;11(2):89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland IE A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I, 1968, San Francisco, California: ACM, p. 757–764.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo A. Virtual reality exposure therapy for combat-related PTSD, in Post-traumatic stress disorder. Springer, Switzerland ; 2009. p. 375–399.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar A. Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning. Multimed Tools Appl. 2017;76(20):21613–21627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salta K. Shift from a traditional to a distance learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: university students’ engagement and interactions. Sci Educ (Dordr). 2021; 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovoor JG, Gupta AK, Gladman MA, et al. Validity and effectiveness of augmented reality in surgical education: a systematic review. Surgery; 2021. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/surgery.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhail M, Mithani K, Ibrahim GM, et al. Presurgical and intraoperative augmented reality in neuro-oncologic surgery: clinical experiences and limitations. World Neurosurg. 2019;128:268–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehahmadi F, Hajialiasgari F. Grand adventure of augmented reality in landscape of surgery. World J Plast Surg. 2019;8(2):135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewell PJ. Catching more than pocket monsters: pokemon go’s social and psychological effects on players. J Soc Psychol. 2020;160(2):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8):760–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharmin N, Chow AK. Augmented reality application to develop a learning tool for students: transforming cellphones into flashcards. Healthc Inform Res. 2020;26(3):238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro C. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimova A, Bilyatdinova A, Karsafov A, et al. Existing teaching practices in augmented reality. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;136:5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelease RB. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e‐learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(6):583–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H-M, Rauch U, Liaw -S-S, et al. Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: based on a constructivist approach. Comput Educ. 2010;55(3):1171–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albabish W, Jadeski L. Virtual reality to teach human anatomy–an interactive and accessible educational tool. FASEB J. 2018;32(S1):635.1.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh AH. Cadaveric anatomy in the future of medical education: what is the surgeons view?. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Student AM. Core content of the medical school surgical curriculum: Consensus report from the association of surgeons in training (ASIT). Elsevier; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kern DH. Simulation-based teaching to improve cardiovascular exam skills performance among third-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(1):15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RA, Kim S, Dasgupta P, et al. The Future of Surgery, in Digital Surgery. Springer, Switzerland; 2020. p. 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaednia H. Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials. Spine J; 2021. https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/content/aims.
   Google Scholar
• Godzik J. “Disruptive Technology” in spine surgery and education: virtual and augmented reality. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021;21(Supplement_1):S85–S93.
   Google Scholar
• Velazco-Garcia JD. Evaluation of how users interface with holographic augmented reality surgical scenes: interactive planning MR-guided prostate biopsies. Int J Med Robot. 2021;e2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esperto F. New technologies for kidney surgery planning 3D, impression, augmented reality 3D, reconstruction: current realities and expectations. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(7):35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis G, Yilmaz M, Rambach J. Mixed reality applications in urology: requirements and future potential. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2021;66: 102394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf J. Comparing the effectiveness of augmented reality-based and conventional instructions during single ECMO cannulation training. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02408-y.
   Google Scholar
• Nagayo Y, Saito T, Oyama H, et al. A novel suture training system for open surgery replicating procedures performed by experts using augmented reality. J Med Syst. 2021;45(5):60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanese N New neuroanatomy lab bridges virtual reality, operating room. 2018. Available at: https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2018/03/new-neuroanatomy-lab-bridges-virtual-reality-operating-room.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher AG. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(3):479–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpham-Lockyer L. Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(18):1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janse JA. A virtual reality simulator for hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization micro-inserts: the face and construct validity. Gynecological Surgery. 2013;10(3):181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein G. Randomized trial of a virtual reality tool to teach surgical technique for tibial shaft fracture intramedullary nailing. J Surg Educ. 2020;(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Bracq M-S, Michinov E, Jannin P, et al. Virtual reality simulation in nontechnical skills training for healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare. 2019;14(3):188–194.
   Google Scholar
• Grover SC. Impact of a simulation training curriculum on technical and nontechnical skills in colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(6):1072–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudarakanchana N. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: technical and team training in an immersive virtual reality environment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(4):920–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan G. Face and construct validation of a next generation virtual reality (Gen2-VR©) surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):979–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wucherer P. Vertebroplasty performance on simulator for 19 surgeons using hierarchical task analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(8):1730–1737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorozhkin D. OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3527–3533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H-K. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ. 2013;62:41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder RE. Students’ peer relationships and their contribution to university adjustment: the need to belong in the university community. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2018;42(6):756–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez M. Augmented virtual reality: how to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications. 2017;7(1):15.
   Google Scholar
• Steve Chi-Yin Yuen GYAEJ. Augmented reality: an overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE). 2011;4(1):11.
   Google Scholar
• Liao T, Chang PF, Lee S, et al. Augmented reality in health and medicine: a review of augmented reality application for health professionals, procedures, and behavioral interventions. Technology and Health. 2020: 109–128. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tang KS. Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. 2020;11(1):e81.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht U-V. Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e182–e182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd SH, C. H. Mobile Learning Design. In: Churchill D, Lu J, Chiu T, et al., editors. Augmented Learning with Augmented Reality. Singapore: Springer, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology; 2016, pp 97-108.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson L, Adams Becker S, Estrada V, et al. NMC horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. 2015. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon-report-HE-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins G https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/science/sdut-tech-wearables-google-2014may02-story.html#article-copy.
   Google Scholar
• Arbor A https://news.umich.edu/u-m-developing-wearable-tech-for-disease-monitoring/.
   Google Scholar
• Proffitt R. The Institute for Creative Technologies, University of Southern California, Playa Vista, California. http://medvr.ict.usc.edu/.
   Google Scholar