Acceptability, technological feasibility and educational value of remotely facilitated simulation based training: A scoping review

References

• Singh K, Gaur U, Hall K, et al. Teaching anatomy and dissection in an era of social distancing and remote learning. Adv Hum Biol. 2020;10(3):90–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, et al. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e042378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• How TA. COVID‐19 has pushed us into a medical education revolution. Intern Med J. 2020;50(9):1150–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathrop A, Winningham B, VandeVusse L. Simulation-based learning for midwives: background and pilot implementation. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(5):492–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen MD, Rieger K, Tan S, et al. Remotely Versus Locally Facilitated Simulation-based Training in Management of the Deteriorating Patient by Newly Graduated Health Professionals: a Controlled Trial. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(6):352–359.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeyama T, Shimizu N, Ohta K. Low-cost and ready-to-go remote-facilitated simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(1):35–39.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, et al. Telesimulation: an Innovative Tool for Health Professions Education. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(2):132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM. Medical education for rural areas: opportunities and challenges for information and communications technologies. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51(4):301–307.
   Google Scholar
• RA A, King GA, SS A, et al. Teledebriefing: connecting learners to faculty members. Clin Teach. 2014;11(4):270–273.
   Google Scholar
• Brown M, McCormack M, Reeves J, et al. Educause Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition. 2020. EDUCAUSE. 2020 [cited 2021 Jul 25]. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/215670/
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton G, Ortega R, Hochstetler V, et al. Teaching communication skills to hospice teams: comparing the effectiveness of a communication skills laboratory with in-person, second life, and phone role-playing. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014;31(6):611–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo‐Alvarez R, Rudolphi‐Solero T, Ruiz‐Gomez MJ, et al. Game‐Based learning in virtual worlds: a multiuser online game for medical undergraduate radiology education within second life. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(5):602–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiecha J, Heyden R, Sternthal E, et al. Learning in a virtual world: experience with using second life for medical education. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H and O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Collins C, Lovett M, Biffar D, et al. The use of remote and traditional facilitation to evaluate telesimulation to support interprofessional education and processing in healthcare simulation training.  In 2019 Spring Simulation Conference (SpringSim).  IEEE 2019, Tucson, AZ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden EM, Navedo DD, Gordon JA. Web-conferenced simulation sessions: a satisfaction survey of clinical simulation encounters via remote supervision. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(7):525–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao M, Kashyap R, Niven A, et al. Feasibility of an International Remote Simulation Training Program in Critical Care Delivery: a Pilot Study. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018;2(3):229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed RA, Atkinson SS, Gable B, et al. Coaching From the Sidelines: examining the Impact of Teledebriefing in Simulation-Based Training. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(5):334–339.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Rahman A, et al. Prospective Randomized Crossover Study of Telesimulation Versus Standard Simulation for Teaching Medical Students the Management of Critically Ill Patients. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(4):287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Ohta K, Kurosawa H, Shiima Y, et al. The Effectiveness of Remote Facilitation in Simulation-Based Pediatric Resuscitation Training for Medical Students. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33(8):564–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolle SR, Larsen F, Hagen O, et al. Video conferencing versus telephone calls for team work across hospitals: a qualitative study on simulated emergencies. BMC Emerg Med. 2009;9(1):22.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan A, Dong Y, Chen X, et al. Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• RM F, DM G. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(2):115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside AL, Dikkers AG. Leveraging the Social Presence Model: A Decade of Research on Emotion in Online and Blended Learning, In Tettegah SY, McCrerry MP, eds. Emotions, Technology, and Learning. Elselvier. Elselvier. 2016;225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapum JL, Verkuyl M, Hughes M, et al. Self-Debriefing in Virtual Simulation. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(6):E6–E8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker ST, Sevdalis N, McKay A, et al. Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(6):453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader TW, Flin R, Mearns K, et al. Developing a team performance framework for the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1787–1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevdalis N, Brett SJ. Improving care by understanding the way we work: human factors and behavioural science in the context of intensive care. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen SS, Arafeh J Implementing and sustaining in situ drills to improve multidisciplinary health care training. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(4):559–570. quiz 570-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey JO, Mighty HE. Shoulder dystocia using simulation to train providers and teams. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(2):114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MD, Blike GT, Nadkarni VM. In situ simulation: challenges and results. In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug
   Google Scholar
• Stone N. Evaluating interprofessional education: the tautological need for interdisciplinary approaches. J Interprof Care. 2006;20(3):260–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor DC, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Statement on Medical Education. 2017. [cited 2020 Jun 13]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-medical-education/.
   Google Scholar