3,975
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Medical Education e-Professionalism (MEeP) framework; from conception to development

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Article: 1983926 | Received 07 May 2021, Accepted 17 Sep 2021, Published online: 13 Nov 2021

References

  • Cain J, Romanelli F. E-professionalism: a new paradigm for a digital age. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2009;1(2):66–25.
  • Ellaway RH, Coral J, Topps D, et al. Exploring digital professionalism. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):844–849.
  • Guraya SY. The usage of social networking sites by medical students for educational purposes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. N Am J Med Sci. 2016;8(7):268.
  • Desai SP, Lele V. Correlating internet, social networks and workplace-a case of generation Z students. J Comm Manage Thought. 2017;8(4):802.
  • Goldie JGS. Connectivism: a knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Med Teach. 2016;38(10):1064–1069.
  • Fenwick T, Edwards R. Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. Europ Educat Res J. 2016;15(1):117–131.
  • Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L. Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40(2):183–190.
  • Alhusseini N, Banta JE, Oh J, et al. Social Media Use for Health Purposes by Chronic Disease Patients in the USA. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2021;9(1):51.
  • Hill SS, Dore FJ, Steven TE, et al. Twitter use among departments of surgery with general surgery residency programs. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(1):35–42.
  • Alleje ML, Austria BC, Shrestha PA. Social media etiquette in medicine. Br J Hosp Med. 2019;80(9):130–132.
  • Luan H, Wang M, Sokol RL, et al. A scoping review of WeChat to facilitate professional healthcare education in Mainland China. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1782594.
  • Zeng F, Deng G, Wang Z, et al. WeChat: a new clinical teaching tool for problem-based learning. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:119.
  • Eghtesadi M, Florea A. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit and TikTok: a proposal for health authorities to integrate popular social media platforms in contingency planning amid a global pandemic outbreak. Can J Public Health. 2020;111:389–391.
  • Bour C, Schmitz S, Ahne A, et al. Scoping review protocol on the use of social media for health research purposes. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e040671.
  • Singh T, Roberts K, Cohen T, et al. Social Media as a Research Tool (SMaaRT) for risky behavior analytics: methodological review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(4):e21660.
  • Spector ND, Matz PS, Levine LJ, et al. e-Professionalism: challenges in the age of information. J Pediatr. 2010;156(3):345–346.
  • Seidel RL, Jalilvand A, Kunjummen J, et al. Radiologists and social media: do not forget about Facebook. J Am College Radiol. 2018;15(1):224–228.
  • Patel MS, Davis MM, Lypson ML. Advancing medical education by teaching health policy. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):695–697.
  • Monrouxe LV. Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Med Educ. 2010;44(1):40–49.
  • Gholami-Kordkheili F, Wild V, Strech D. The impact of social media on medical professionalism: a systematic qualitative review of challenges and opportunities. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e184.
  • Chou W-YS, Oh A, Klein WM. Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. Jama. 2018;320(23):2417–2418.
  • Peck JL. Social media in nursing education: responsible integration for meaningful use. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):164–169.
  • Muls J, Thomas V, De Backer F, et al. Identifying the nature of social media policies in high schools. Educat Inform Technol. 2020;25(1):281–305.
  • Brody H, Doukas D. Professionalism: a framework to guide medical education. Med Educ. 2014;48(10):980–987.
  • Billett S. Cooke, M., Irby, DM & O’Brien, BC. Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638–645.
  • Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, et al. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):718–725.
  • Bilau AA, Witt E, Lill I. Research methodology for the development of a framework for managing post-disaster housing reconstruction. Procedia Eng. 2018;212:598–605.
  • Corti L. The European landscape of qualitative social research archives: Methodological and practical issues. InForum: Qualitative Social Research 2011 (Vol. 12, No. 3). FQS.
  • Guraya SY, Almaramhy H, Al-Qahtani MF, et al. Measuring the extent and nature of use of Social Networking Sites in Medical Education (SNSME) by university students: results of a multi-center study. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1505400.
  • Guraya SY, Al-Qahtani MF, Bilal B, et al. Comparing the extent and pattern of use of social networking sites by medical and non medical university students: a multi-center study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:575.
  • Guraya SS, Guraya SY, Yusoff MSB. Preserving professional identities, behaviors, and values in digital professionalism using social networking sites; a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–12.
  • Guraya S. Prognostic significance of circulating microRNA-21 expression in esophageal, pancreatic and colorectal cancers; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;60:41–47.
  • Cooke A, Smith D, Beyond BA. PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–1443.
  • Morgan MP, Thomas W, Rashid-Doubell F. Academic staff perspectives on delivering a shared undergraduate medical module on three transnational campuses: practical considerations and lessons learned. Med Teach. 2020;42(1):36–38.
  • Hsu -C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(1):10.
  • List D. Maximum variation sampling for surveys and consensus groups. Adelaide: audience Dialogue. J Qualitat Res EducatJOQRE. 2004.
  • Saldana J. Analyzing longitudinal qualitative observational data. Handbook of longitudinal research: design, measurement, and analysis. 2008;297–311.
  • Watling CJ, Lingard L. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):850–861.
  • Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, et al. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(3):377–394.
  • Foster RL. Addressing epistemologic and practical issues in multimethod research: a procedure for conceptual triangulation. Adv Nurs Sci. 1997;20(2):1–12.
  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook Qualitat Res. 1994;2(163–194):105.
  • Yuan B, Li J. The policy effect of the general data protection regulation (GDPR) on the digital public health sector in the european union: an empirical investigation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):1070.
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, and Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage publications; 2014.
  • Korthagen FA. In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching Teacher Educ. 2004;20(1):77–97.
  • Choudhury S, McKinney KA. Digital media, the developing brain and the interpretive plasticity of neuroplasticity. Transcult Psychiatry. 2013;50(2):192–215.
  • Firth J, Torous J, Stubbs B, et al. The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(2):119–129.
  • Coulehan J. Today’s Professionalism: engaging the Mind but Not the Heart. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):892–898.
  • Schenarts PJ. Now arriving: surgical trainees from generation Z. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(2):246–253.
  • Jha V, Brockbank S, Roberts T. A framework for understanding lapses in professionalism among medical students: applying the theory of planned behavior to fitness to practice cases. Acad Med. 2016;91(12):1622–1627.
  • Crone EA, Konijn EA. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–10.
  • PrakashYadav G, Rai J. The Generation Z and their social media usage: a review and a research outline. Global J Enterprise Inform Syst. 2017;9(2):110–116.
  • Holden M, Buck E, Clark M, Szauter K, Trumble J.Professional identity formation in medical education: The convergence of multiple domains. HEC Forum. 2012;24:245–255.
  • Knight LV, Mattick K. ‘When I first came here, I thought medicine was black and white’: making sense of medical students’ ways of knowing. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(4):1084–1096.
  • Davis JL, Jurgenson N. Context collapse: theorizing context collusions and collisions. Inform Comm Soc. 2014;17(4):476–485.
  • Marwick AE, Boyd D. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Med Soc. 2011;13(1):114–133.
  • Kesselheim JC, Batra M, Belmonte F, et al. New professionalism challenges in medical training: an exploration of social networking. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1):100.
  • Gordon L, Rees CE, Jindal‐Snape D. Doctors’ identity transitions: choosing to occupy a state of ‘betwixt and between’. Med Educ. 2020;54(11):1006–1018.
  • Bergner RM, Holmes JR. Self-concepts and self-concept change: a status dynamic approach. Psychotherapy. 2000;37(1):36.
  • Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Granderath FA, et al. Reflections of the Hippocratic Oath in modern medicine. World J Surg. 2010;34(12):3075–3079.
  • Kohlberg L, Hersh RH. Moral development: a review of the theory. Theory into Pract. 1977;16(2):53–59.
  • O’Regan A, Smithson WH, Spain E. Social media and professional identity: pitfalls and potential. Med Teach. 2018;40(2):112–116.
  • Erikson EH. Eight ages of man. Int J Psychiat. 1966.
  • Marcia JE. Development and validation of ego-identity status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966;3(5):551.
  • Van Der Zwet J, Zwietering P, Teunissen P, et al. Workplace learning from a socio-cultural perspective: creating developmental space during the general practice clerkship. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16(3):359–373.
  • Ruan B, Yilmaz Y, Lu D, et al. Defining the Digital Self: a Qualitative Study to Explore the Digital Component of Professional Identity in the Health Professions. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e21416.