Anxiety is associated with extraneous cognitive load during teaching using high-fidelity clinical simulation

References

• McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias RD, Scalabrini-Neto A. Acute stress in residents playing different roles during emergency simulations: a preliminary study. Int J Med Educ. 2017;8:239–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel A, Ringleb M, Schwartges I, et al. Endocrine and psychological stress responses in a simulated emergency situation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36(1):98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMaria S, Silverman ER, Lapidus KA, et al. The impact of simulated patient death on medical students’ stress response and learning of ACLS. Med Teach. 2016;38(7):730–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, et al. Learning during simulation training is prone to retroactive interference. Med Educ. 2012;46(3):299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong CL, Lightdale JR, Fredette ME, et al. Effects of simulation versus traditional tutorial-based training on physiologic stress levels among clinicians: a pilot study. Simul Healthcare J Soc S Healthcare. 2010;5(5):272–278.
   Google Scholar
• Darke S. Effects of anxiety on inferential reasoning task performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(3):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorg BA, Whitney P. The effect of trait anxiety and situational stress on working memory capacity. J Res Pers. 1992;26(3):235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft MH, Kirk EP. The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001;130(2):224–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser KL, Ayres P, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory for the design of medical simulations. Simul Healthcare J Soc S Healthcare. 2015;10(5):295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merrienboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller J, Van Merrienboer JJ, Paas FG. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev. 1998;10(3):251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman EM, De Bruin AB, Vorstenbosch MA, et al. Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):133.
   Google Scholar
• Leppink J, van den Heuvel A. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(3):119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser KL, Meguerdichian MJ, Haws JT, et al. Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development. Adv Simul (Lond). 2018;3(1):28.
   Google Scholar
• Hadie SNH, Yusoff MSB. Assessing the validity of the cognitive load scale in a problem-based learning setting. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016;11(3):194–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppink J, Paas F, Van der Vleuten CP, et al. Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behav Res Methods. 2013;45(4):1058–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debue N, van de Leemput C. What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar S, Jacques T, Deshpande K, et al. Evaluation of cognitive load and emotional states during multidisciplinary critical care simulation sessions. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2018;4(2):87–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldekhyl S, Cavalcanti RB, Naismith LM. Cognitive load predicts point-of-care ultrasound simulator performance. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MM. Cognitive Load, Anxiety, and performance during a simulated subarachnoid block. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;36:30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser K, Huffman J, Ma I, et al. The emotional and cognitive impact of unexpected simulated patient death: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2014;145(5):958–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, et al. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training. Med Educ. 2012;46(11):1055–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reedy GB. Using cognitive load theory to inform simulation design and practice. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015;11(8):355–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JQ, Sewell JL. Applying cognitive load theory to medical education: construct and measurement challenges. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(3):107–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey A, Nathens AB, Bandiera G, et al. Threat and challenge: cognitive appraisal and stress responses in simulated trauma resuscitations. Med Educ. 2010;44(6):587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corvetto MA, Taekman JM. To die or not to die? A review of simulated death. Simul Healthcare J Soc S Healthcare. 2013;8(1):8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Horeczko T, Cotton D, et al. Heart rate, anxiety and performance of residents during a simulated critical clinical encounter: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):153.
   Google Scholar
• Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation - a continuum of medical education? Med Educ. 2003;37(Suppl 1):22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehmann AJ, Mitman RD, and Reynolds MC. A handbook of flight simulation fidelity requirements for human factors research. Dayton, Ohio, USA: Crew system ergonomics information analysis center wright-patterson afb oh; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, et al. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthcare J Soc S Healthcare. 2006;1(1):49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R. STAI Manual. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger C. Manual fo State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Knight RG, Waal-Manning HJ, Spears GF. Some norms and reliability data for the state–trait anxiety inventory and the Zung self-rating depression scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 1983;22(Pt 4):245–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evain J-N, Zoric L, Mattatia L, et al. Residual anxiety after high fidelity simulation in anaesthesiology: an observational, prospective, pilot study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(4):205–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, et al. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(2):279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar