1,816
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

From self-regulation to co-regulation: refining learning presence in a community of inquiry in interprofessional education

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2217549 | Received 26 Sep 2022, Accepted 21 May 2023, Published online: 27 May 2023

References

  • Freeth D, Hammick M, Reeves S, et al. Effective interprofessional education: development, delivery and evaluation [Internet]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2005 [cited 2021 Jun 22]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470776438.fmatter
  • Ganotice FA, Gill H, Fung JTC, et al. Autonomous motivation explains interprofessional education outcomes. Med Educ. 2021;55(6):701–11.
  • Buring SM, Bhushan A, Broeseker A, et al. Interprofessional education: definitions, student competencies, and guidelines for implementation. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Jul 10;73(4):59. DOI:10.5688/aj730459
  • Irajpour A, Farzi S, Saghaei M, et al. Effect of interprofessional education of medication safety program on the medication error of physicians and nurses in the intensive care units. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:196.
  • Zanotti R, Sartor G, Canova C. Effectiveness of interprofessional education by on-field training for medical students, with a pre-post design. BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jul 29;15(1):121.
  • O’Leary N, Salmon N, Clifford AM. ‘It benefits patient care’: the value of practice-based IPE in healthcare curriculums. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):424.
  • Grimes TC, Guinan EM. Interprofessional education focused on medication safety: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2022 Jan 20;37:1–19.
  • Choudhury RI, Salam M, Mathur J, et al. How interprofessional education could benefit the future of healthcare – medical students’ perspective. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 29;20:242.
  • DR B, RA D, PS O, et al. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online. 2011 Apr 8;16:6035.
  • Sibbald S, Schouten K, Sedig K, et al. Key characteristics and critical junctures for successful Interprofessional networks in healthcare - a case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):700.
  • Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2000;2(2):87–105.
  • Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. Internet High Educ. 2007;10(3):157–172.
  • . Neill HM, Reeves S, Hanna E, et al. The community of inquiry framework: a pertinent theory of online interprofessional education? In: Bromage A, Clouder L, Thistlethwaite J Gordon F, editors. Interprofessional e-learning and collaborative work: practice and technologies [Internet]. IGI Global; 2010. [[cited 2021 Jun 16]. Available from]. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-889-0
  • Arbaugh JB. Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online mba courses? Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2008 Jun 30 [cited 2021 Jun 16]. 9(2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/490
  • Castellanos-Reyes D. 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends. 2020 Jul;64(4):557–560.
  • Vaughan N, Cleveland-Innes M, Garrison DR Teaching in Blended Learning Environments [Internet]. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press; 2013 [cited 2021 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.aupress.ca/books/120229-teaching-in-blended-learning-environments/
  • Richardson JC, Maeda Y, Lv J, et al. Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: a meta-analysis. Comput Hum Behav. 2017 Jun 1;71:402–417.
  • Zhang Y, Lin CH. Effects of community of inquiry, learning presence and mentor presence on K-12 online learning outcomes. J Comput Assist Learn. 2021;37(3):782–796.
  • Lam JY Autonomy presence in the extended community of inquiry. Int J Contin Educ Lifelong Learn [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2021 Jun 22]; Available from: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.705821081676347
  • Shea P, Bidjerano T. Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Comput Educ. 2012 Sep 1;59(2):316–326.
  • Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a self-regulated learner: which are the key subprocesses? Contemp Educ Psychol. 1986 Oct 1;11(4):307–313.
  • Shea P, Bidjerano T. Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Comput Educ. 2010 Dec;55(4):1721–1731.
  • Cho H. Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. J Second Lang Writ. 2017 Jun 1;36:37–51.
  • Rich JV. Proposing a Model of Co-Regulated Learning for Graduate Medical Education. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2017;92(8):1100–1104.
  • DiDonato NC. Effective self- and Co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: an analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instr Sci. 2013 Jan;41(1):25–47.
  • Garrison DR, Akyol Z. Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. Internet High Educ. 2015 Jan 1;24:66–71.
  • Edelbring S, Wahlström R. Dynamics of study strategies and teacher regulation in virtual patient learning activities: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 23;16:122.
  • Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
  • Barnard L, Lan WY, To YM, et al. Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet High Educ. 2009;12(1):1–6.
  • Rovai AP. Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet High Educ. 2002 Jan 1;5(4):319–332.
  • Jung H, Park KH, Min YH, et al. The effectiveness of interprofessional education programs for medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Jun;32(2):131–142.
  • Kuo YC, Walker AE, Schroder KEE, et al. Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet High Educ. 2014 Jan 1;20:35–50.
  • Lin CH, Zheng B, Zhang Y. Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses: online interactions and learning outcomes. Br J Educ Technol Internet. 2016 Apr–Oct [cited 2016 14]; Available from;48:730–748. 10.1111/bjet.12457
  • Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. A first course in structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. Vol. ix. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006. A first course in structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. p. 238.
  • Tze HL, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999 Jan 1;6(1):1–55.
  • Kozan K, Caskurlu S. On the Nth presence for the Community of Inquiry framework. Comput Educ. 2018 Jul 1;122:104–118.
  • Bransen D, Govaerts MJB, Sluijsmans DMA, et al. Beyond the self: the role of Co-regulation in medical students’ self-regulated learning. Med Educ. 2020;54(3):234–241.
  • Bransen D, Govaerts MJB, Panadero E, et al. Putting self-regulated learning in context: integrating self-, co-, and socially shared regulation of learning. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):29–36.
  • Larsen DP. Expanding the definition of learning: from self to social to system. Med Educ. 2019 Jun;53(6):539–542.
  • Swan K, Shih LF. ON the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Online Learn [Internet] Available from. 2019 Mar 19[cited 2022 May 5];9(3):10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788
  • Brown GTL, Harris LR. Student Self-Assessment. In: SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment [Internet]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2013 cited 2022 Jun 6. pp. 367–393. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_classroomassessment/n21.xml
  • Jay J, Owen A. Providing Opportunities for Student Self-Assessment: the Impact on the Acquisition of Psychomotor Skills in Occupational Therapy Students. Assess Eval High Educ. 2016;41(8):1176–1192.
  • Yan Z. Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assess Eval High Educ. 2020 Feb 17;45(2):224–238.
  • Hadwin AF, Järvelä S, Miller M. Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In: Educational psychology handbook series, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2011: pp. 65–84.
  • Zheng L, Yu J. Exploring the behavioral patterns of Co-regulation in mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. Smart Learn Environ. 2016 Jan 19;3(1):1.
  • Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Tjosvold D. Constructive controversy: the value of intellectual opposition. In: The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice. Hoboken, NJ, US: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2000: pp. 65–85.
  • Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2016.
  • Abu-Rish E, Kim S, Choe L, et al. Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review. J Interprof Care. 2012 Nov;26(6):444–451.
  • Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, et al. A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: bEME Guide No. 39. Med Teach. 2016 Jul 2;38(7):656–668. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663
  • Panadero E, Jonsson A, Strijbos JW. Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: guidelines for Classroom Implementation. In: Laveault D, and Allal L editors. Assessment for Learning: meeting the Challenge of Implementation [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016, pp. 311–326. cited 2022 Jun 6. The Enabling Power of Assessment Available from. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18
  • Panadero E. Is It Safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: a review and future directions. In: Brown G, and Harris L, editors. Human factors and social conditions of assessment. New York: Routledge; 2016. pp. 247-266.
  • Topping K. Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility. In: Segers M, Dochy F, and Cascallar E editors. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: in Search of Qualities and Standards [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2003, pp. 55–87. cited 2022 Jun 6. Innovation and Change in Professional Education Available from. DOI:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4
  • Callan GL, Cleary TJ. Multidimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. Sch Psychol Q Off J Div Sch Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2018;33(1):103–111.
  • Gandomkar R, Mirzazadeh A, Jalili M, et al. Self-regulated learning processes of medical students during an academic learning task. Med Educ. 2016 Oct;50(10):1065–1074.
  • Moos DC, Bonde C. Flipping the classroom: embedding self-regulated learning prompts in videos. Technol Knowl Learn. 2016 Jul 1;21(2):225–242.
  • Gandomkar R, Yazdani K, Fata L, et al. Using multiple self-regulated learning measures to understand medical students’ biomedical science learning. Med Educ. 2020;54(8):727–737. DOI:10.1111/medu.14079
  • Saint J, Fan Y, Gašević D, et al. Temporally-focused analytics of self-regulated learning: a systematic review of literature. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2022 Jan 1;3:100060.