Student engagement and learning outcomes: an empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework

References

• Fredricks JA, Filsecker M, Lawson MA. Student engagement, context, and adjustment: addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learn Instr. 2016;43:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong ZY, Liem GAD. Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educ Psychol Rev. 2021;34(1):1–32. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler V. Student engagement literature review. Higher Educ Acad. 2010;11(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Axelson RD, Flick A. Defining student engagement. Change Mag High Learn. 2010;43(1):38–43. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
   Google Scholar
• Kuh GD. Assessing what really matters to student learning inside the national survey of student engagement. Change Mag High Learn. 2001;33(3):10–17. doi: 10.1080/00091380109601795
   Google Scholar
• Kuh GD, Kinzie JL, Buckley JA, et al. What matters to student success: a review of the literature. Vol. 8. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Carini RM, Kuh GD, Klein SP. Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. Res Higher Educ. 2006;47(1):1–32. doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Tseng CM. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2011;36(4):257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Xie M, Lian Z. Emotional engagement and student satisfaction: a study of Chinese college students based on a nationally representative sample. Asia-Pac Educ Res. 2019;28(4):283–292. doi: 10.1007/s40299-019-00437-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collie RJ, Holliman AJ, Martin AJ. Adaptability, engagement and academic achievement at university. Educ Psychol. 2017;37(5):632–647. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2016.1231296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öz Y, Boyacı A. The role of student engagement in student outcomes in higher education: implications from a developing country. Int J Educ Res. 2021;110:101880. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo R. Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(1):84–94. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra GM, Heddy BC, Lombardi D. The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn JD. Withdrawing from school. Rev Educ Res. 1989;59(2):117–142. doi: 10.3102/00346543059002117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Furrer CJ. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educ Psychol Meas. 2009;69(3):493–525. doi: 10.1177/0013164408323233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(1):59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(3):579. doi: 10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Sandra LC, Amy LR, Cathy W, editors. Handbook of research on student engagement. Boston, MA: Springer; 2012. p. 149–172.
   Google Scholar
• Salmela‐Aro K, Tang X, Symonds J, et al. Student engagement in adolescence: a scoping review of longitudinal studies 2010–2020. J Res Adolesc. 2021;31(2):256–272. doi: 10.1111/jora.12619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks HM. Student engagement in instructional activity: patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. Am Educat Res J. 2000;37(1):153–184. doi: 10.3102/00028312037001153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene BA. Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: reflections from over 20 years of research. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(1):14–30. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.989230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei H, Cui Y, Zhou W. Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Soc Behav Pers. 2018;46(3):517–528. doi: 10.2224/sbp.7054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Cheon SH, Jang H. How and why students make academic progress: reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020;62:101899. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez M, Tomás JM. The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students’ academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educ Psychol. 2019;39(6):729–748. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab SE, El-Sayed W, Hamdy H. Student engagement in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2022;56(7):703–715. doi: 10.1111/medu.14799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab SE, Taylor D, Hamdy H. Student engagement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 152. Med Teach. 2022;1–17. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2198095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG, Rajalingam P, et al. How cognitive engagement fluctuates during a team-based learning session and how it predicts academic achievement. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(2):339–351. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9801-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper MK, Brake DA. Student engagement and higher order skill proficiency: a comparison of traditional didactic and renewed integrated active learning curricula. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42(4):685–692. doi: 10.1152/advan.00149.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper MK, Kaiser AN. Engagement and higher order skill proficiency of students completing a medical physiology course in three diverse learning environments. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42(3):429–438. doi: 10.1152/advan.00128.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanov Z, Antoniou P, Suleymanov E, et al. The impact of behavioural, cognitive and emotional dimensions of student engagement on student learning: the case of Azerbaijani higher education institutions. Int J Knowl Learn. 2021;14(1):10–38. doi: 10.1504/IJKL.2021.115027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike GR. Using college students’ self‐reported learning outcomes in scholarly research. New Dir Inst Res. 2011;2011(150):41–58. doi: 10.1002/ir.388
   Google Scholar
• Zilvinskis J, Masseria AA, Pike GR. Student engagement and student learning: examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised national survey of student engagement. Res Higher Educ. 2017;58(8):880–903. doi: 10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GT, Harris LR, Eds. Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016. p. 323.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, et al. Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Darwazeh AN, Branch RM. A revision to the revised bloom’s taxonomy. 2015 Annual Proceedings of Association for Educational Communications and Technology; Indianapolis. 2015;2:220–225.
   Google Scholar
• National Medical Examination Center. Guidelines for medical Examination question development. Beijing, China: National Medical Examination Center; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• USMILE (U.S. Medical Licensing Examination). (2020). Invitational conference on USMLE scoring: change to pass/fail score reporting for step 1. https://www.usmle.org/incus/.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh GD, Cruce TM, Shoup R, et al. Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. J Higher Educ. 2008;79(5):540–563. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai CE, Chi W, Qian X. Do college entrance examination scores predict undergraduate GPAs? A tale of two universities. China Econ Rev. 2014;30:632–647. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2013.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch GF, Heller NA, Burch JJ, et al. Student engagement: developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. J Educ Bus. 2015;90(4):224–229. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli C, Passini S. Development and validation of an enlarged version of the student agentic engagement scale. J Psychoeducational Assess. 2019;37(4):450–463. doi: 10.1177/0734282918757849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten I, Brante EW, Strømsø HI. What really matters: the role of behavioural engagement in multiple document literacy tasks. J Res Read. 2018;41(4):680–699. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro VB, Sridharan B, Watty K, et al. The impact of learner engagement on performance outcomes: a longitudinal study in accounting education. Account Finance. 2021;61(S1):1639–1664. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12640
   Google Scholar
• Burk-Rafel J, Santen SA, Purkiss J. Study behaviors and USMLE step 1 performance: implications of a student self-directed parallel curriculum. Acad Med. 2017;92(11S):S67–S74. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fetter M, Robbs R, Cianciolo AT. Clerkship curriculum design and USMLE step 2 performance: exploring the impact of self-regulated exam preparation. Med Sci Educator. 2019;29(1):265–276. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00691-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu H, Zheng J, Li S, et al. Does academic interest play a more important role in medical sciences than in other disciplines? A nationwide cross-sectional study in China. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1737-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheakley ML, Gilbert GE, Leighton K, et al. A brief simulation intervention increasing basic science and clinical knowledge. Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):30744. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.30744
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read Psych Cult. 2011;2(1):2307–2919. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
   Google Scholar