Enhancing Memory Access for Less Skilled Readers

References

• Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, And Cognition, 21(6), 1459–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during reading: Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 87–107. doi:10.1080/01638539809545040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1991). Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 932–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. JEP:LMC, 19, 1061–1070.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1995). Goal processing and the maintenance of global coherence. In R. R. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 263–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 325–346. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.902461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., & Gülgöz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 329–345. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). What is readily available during reading? A memory-based view of text processing. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 109–129. doi:10.1080/01638539809545041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 26–49. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. doi:10.1111/cdir.2002.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ericcson, K. A., & Kintch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. (1993). Less-skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4, 294–298. doi:10.1111/psci.1993.4.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R., & McKoon, G. (1998). The readiness is all: The functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes, 26, 67–86. doi:10.1080/01638539809545039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–242. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202. doi:10.3758/BF03195564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., Snowling, M., & Clark, P. (2013). Accessing, integrating, and inhibiting word meaning in poor comprehenders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 177–198. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.652721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review, 103(4), 773–780. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2013). Updating during reading: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 854–865. doi:10.1037/a0029468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Chong, J. L. (2001). Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders’ abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1424–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Lea, R. (2005). Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the ‘Search After Meaning’ principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 279–298. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading test (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615–629. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. (1997). Comprehension skill: A knowledge-based account. In S. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 508–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 55(1), 51–62. doi:10.1037/h0087352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. doi:10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D., & McDaniel, M. (2004). Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 465–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “d’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 525–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(4), 335–354.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., Cook, A. E., Kambe, G., Mason, R. A., & O’Brien, E. S. (2000). Semantic and episodic effects on bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 29, 179–199. doi:10.1207/S15326950dp2903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. doi:10.1080/01638539809545042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J. (1987). Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 278–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L. (1995). Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 626–634. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016a). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53, 326–338. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016b). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Peracchi, K. A. (2004). Updating situation models: Reply to Zwaan and Madden. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 289–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory and Cognition, 15(5), 419–427. doi:10.3758/BF03197731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 36–53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Plewes, P. S., & Albrecht, J. E. (1990). Antecedent retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Raney, G. E., Albrecht, J. E., & Rayner, K. (1997). Processes involved in the resolution of explicit anaphors. Discourse Processes, 23, 1–24. doi:10.1080/01638539709544979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24(5), 1200–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007a). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152. doi:10.1080/01638530709336895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007b). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional ‘high-stakes’ measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161–196. doi:10.3102/0002831206298171
   Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1995). Cognitive research can inform reading education. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 106–115. doi:10.1111/jrir.1995.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., Yang, C., & Schmalhofer, F. (2008). Comprehension skill and word-to-text integration process. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 303–318. doi:10.1002/acp.1419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2007). Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 35(8), 2019–2032. doi:10.3758/BF03192934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Noticing and revising discrepancies as text unfolds. Discourse Processes, 46, 1–24. doi:10.1080/01638530802629141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension. An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 276–279. doi:10.1111/cdir.2005.14.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. doi:10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzella, M. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1996). Accessing global causes during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1208–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzella, M. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (2002). Retrieval of concepts in script-based texts and narratives: The influence of general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 780–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3–4), SI235–SI262. doi:10.1080/01690968908406369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2012). Tracking spatial information during reading: A cue-based process. Memory & Cognition, 40(5), 791–801. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0190-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegler, J. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2009, November). Reading skill and the maintenance of global coherence. Poster presented at the 2009 Psychonomic Society Conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 3–34. doi:10.1080/01638539309544827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612–630. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: Examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(6), 1020–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: An examination of differences in accessibility. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(12), 2397–2410. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.690438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, G., & Gilabert, R. (2000). Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 107–116. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar