Competing Activation During Fantasy Text Comprehension

References

• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1991). Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 932–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E. (2014). Processing anomalous anaphors. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1171–1185. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0415-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2005). What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 365–378. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Myers, J. L. (2004). Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 268–288. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., Walsh, E., Bills, M. A. A., Kircher, J. C., & O’Brien, E. J. (2016). Validation of semantic illusions independent of anomaly detection: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 609–626. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2013). The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: Evidence from eye movements and ERPs. Brain Research, 1506, 94–104. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1250–1259. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0436-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Terras, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 526–544. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéraud, S., Harmon, M. E., & Peracchi, K. A. (2005). Updating situation models: The memory-based contribution. Discourse Processes, 39, 243–263. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberner, M., & Richter, T. (2014). Does validation during language comprehension depend on an evaluative mindset? Discourse Processes, 51, 7–25. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Chong, J. L. (2001). Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders’ abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1424–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Lea, R. B. (2005). Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the” search after meaning” principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 279–298. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-macginitie reading test (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. doi:10.1080/01638539809545042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098–1111. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 777–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016a). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53, 326–338. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016b). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65, pp. 249–276). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. Van Den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35–53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peracchi, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J. (2004). Character profiles and the activation of predictive inferences. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1044–1052. doi:10.3758/BF03196880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N. (2016). The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 281–285. doi:10.1177/0963721416649347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., & Horton, W. S. (2014). Amazing stories: Acquiring and avoiding inaccurate information from fiction. Discourse Processes, 51, 50–74. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzella, M. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (2002). Retrieval of concepts in script-based texts and narratives: The influence of general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 780–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how?: Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI235–SI262. doi:10.1080/01690968908406369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 574–591. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361–366. doi:10.1177/0963721413495236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Doering, J. C. (2014). Exploring individual differences in language validation. Discourse Processes, 5, 167–188. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855534
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2016). Enhancing memory for less-skilled readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 421–435. doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1214590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegler, J. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2009, November). Reading skill and the maintenance of global coherence. Poster presented at the 2009 Psychonomic Society Conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E. K., Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2018). Overcoming violations of real-world knowledge in a fantasy-world text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advanced Online Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, T., McConnell, K., & Rayner, K. (2008). Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1001–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. R., Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (in press). Processing semantic anomalies: Validation against general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
   Google Scholar