4,394
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cognitive Constraints on the Simple View of Reading: A Longitudinal Study in Children With Intellectual Disabilities

ORCID Icon, , &

References

  • Aarnoutse, C. (1997). Begrijpend Leestest voor Groep 3 Basisonderwijs [Reading comprehension test for first grade]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets Test Publishers.
  • Antshel, K., Hier, B., Fremont, W., Faraone, S. V., & Kates, W. (2014). Predicting reading comprehension academic achievement in late adolescents with velo-cardio-facial (22q11.2 deletion) dyndrome (VCFS): A longitudinal study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58, 926–939. doi:10.1111/jir.12134
  • Asbell, S., Donders, J., Van Tubbergen, M., & Warschausky, S. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension in children with cerebral palsy and typically developing children. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 313–325. doi:10.1080/09297041003733588
  • Bonifacci, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2008). Speed of processing and reading disability: A cross-linguistic investigation of dyslexia and borderline intellectual functioning. Cognition, 107, 999–1017. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.006
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
  • Catts, H. W., Herrera, S., Nielsen, D. C., & Bridges, M. S. (2015). Early prediction of reading comprehension within the simple view framework. Reading and Writing, 28, 1407–1425. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9576-x
  • Choi, W., Tong, X., & Cain, K. (2016). Lexical prosody beyond first-language boundary: Chinese lexical tone sensitivity predicts English reading comprehension. Journal of Experiemental Child Psychology, 148, 70–86. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.04.002
  • Cotton, S. M., Kiely, P. M., Crewther, D. P., Thomson, B., Laycock, R., & Crewther, S. G. (2005). A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s coloured progressive matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 647–659. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.015
  • Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
  • Dessemontet, R. S., & De Chambrier, A. F. (2015). The role of phonological awareness and letter-sound knowledge in the reading development of children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.04.001
  • Egberink, I. J. L., Vermeulen, C. S. M., & Frima, R. M. (2014). COTAN Documentatie [COTAN review of test instruments]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Boom Test Publishers.
  • Engen, L., & Høien, T. (2002). Phonological skills and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 15, 613–631. doi:10.1023/A:1020958105218
  • Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in Kindergarten through Grade 2. Reading and Writing, 28, 655–681. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9544-5
  • Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bryant, V. J., Hamlett, C. L., & Lambert, W. (2012). First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 217–231. doi:10.1177/0022219412442154
  • Goharpey, N., Crewther, D. P., & Crewther, S. G. (2013). Problem solving ability in children with intellectual disability as measured by the Raven’s colored progressive matrices. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4366–4374. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.013
  • Gordon, R. L., Jacobs, M. S., Schuele, C. M., & McAuley, J. D. (2015). Perspectives on the rhythm-grammar link and its implications for typical and atypical language development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337, 16–25. doi:10.1111/nyas.12683
  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
  • Gustafson, S., Samuelsson, C., Johansson, E., & Wallmann, J. (2013). How simple is the simple view of reading? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 292–308. doi:10.1080/00313831.2012.656279
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
  • Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. doi:10.1007/bf00401799
  • Huss, M., Verney, J. P., Fokser, T., Mead, N., & Goswami, U. (2011). Music, rhythm, rise time perception and developmental dyslexia: Perception of musical meter predicts reading and phonology. Cortex, 47, 647–689. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.07.010
  • Jongen, I., & Krom, R. (2009). Drie-minuten-toets (DMT): Handleiding [Three-Minute-Test: Instructions]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
  • Kendeou, P., Van Den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: Implications for reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 10–16. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12025
  • Kim, Y. S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 310–333. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
  • Kjeldsen, A. C., Kärnä, A., Niemi, P., Olofsson, Å., & Witting, K. (2014). Gains from training in phonological awareness in kindergarten predict reading comprehension in grade 9. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 452–467. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.940080
  • Kort, W., Compaan, E., Schittekatte, M., & Dekker, P. H. (2008). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals–Dutch version. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Pearson Assessment and Information.
  • Kort, W., Schittekatte, M., Dekker, P. H., Verhaeghe, P., Compaan, E. L., Bosmans, M., & Vermeir, G. (2005). WISC-III-NL Wechsler intelligence scale for children. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harcourt Test Publishers.
  • Krom, R., & Jongen, I. (2009). DMT en AVI. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
  • Krom, R., Jongen, I., Verhelst, N., Kamphuis, F., & Kleintjes, F. (2010). Wetenschappelijke Verantwoording DMT en AVI [Scientific justification of DMT and AVI reading tests]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
  • Landi, N., Frost, S. J., Mencl, W. E., Sandak, R., & Pugh, K. R. (2013). Neurobiological bases of reading comprehension: Insights from neuroimaging studies of word-level and text-level processing in skilled and impaired readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29, 145–167. doi:10.1080/10573569.2013.758566
  • Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). Learning to read: Should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 151–169. doi:10.1002/rrq.99
  • Lemons, C. J., Zigmond, N., Kloo, A. M., Hill, D. R., Mrachko, A. A., Paterra, M. F., … Davis, S. M. (2013). Performance of students with significant cognitive disabilities on early-grade curriculum-based measures of word and passage reading fluency. Exceptional Children, 79, 408–426. doi:10.1177/001440291307900402
  • Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2017). Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: It’s simple, but complex. Child Development, Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.12861
  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S.-A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352. doi:10.1037/a0026744
  • Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. S. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 336–354. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.4.2
  • Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., … Tóth, D. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003
  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665
  • Nash, H., & Heath, J. (2011). The role of vocabulary, working memory and inference making ability in reading comprehension in down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1782–1791. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.007
  • Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431
  • Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
  • Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23, 189–208. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
  • Perez, T. M., Majerus, S., & Poncelet, M. (2012). The contribution of short-term memory for serial order to early reading acquisition: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 708–723. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.007
  • Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Raven, J. C. (1958). Guide to using the coloured progressive matrices. Oxford, England: H. K. Lewis.
  • Ribeiro, I., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., & Viana, F. L. (2016). Beyond word recognition, fluency, and vocabulary: The influence of reasoning on reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68, 107–115. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12095
  • Roch, M., Florit, E., & Levorato, C. (2011). Follow-up study on reading comprehension in down’s syndrome: The role of reading skills and listening comprehension. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 231–242. doi:10.3109/13682822.2010.487882
  • Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-Dutch version (PPVT-III-NL). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Hartcourt Test Publisher.
  • Schuchardt, K., Gebhardt, M., & Mäehler, C. (2010). Working memory functions in children with different degrees of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 346–353. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01265.x
  • Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18, 617–656. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
  • Soltani, A., & Roslan, S. (2013). Contributions of phonological awareness, phonological short-term memory, and rapid automated naming, toward decoding ability in students with mild intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1090–1099. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.005
  • Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2014). A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Reading and Writing, 27, 101–127. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9435-6
  • Van Bon, W. H. J. (1986). Raven’s coloured progressive matrices: Dutch norms. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Van Tilborg, A., Segers, E., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Predictors of early literacy skills in children with intellectual disabilities: A clinical perspective. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 1674–1685. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.025
  • Van Uden, A. (1983). Diagnostic testing of deaf children, the syndrome of dyspraxia. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Van Wingerden, E., Segers, E., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Cognitive and linguistic predictors of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3139–3147. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.054
  • Van Wingerden, E., Segers, E., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Foundations of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, 211–222. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.015
  • Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. S. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32. doi:10.1080/10888430709336632
  • Verhoeven, L. (1992). LVS Lezen met begrip 1, groep 3-4: Schaal Verwijsrelaties [Reading with comprehension, first and second grade: Anaphora]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
  • Verhoeven, L. (2005). ESM-toets [Test for children with specific language impairment]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
  • Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2001). Taaltoets Alle Kinderen [Language test for all children]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
  • Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2006). Verantwoording Taaltoets Alle Kinderen [Justification of the language test for all children]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
  • Vloedgraven, J., Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Screeningsinstrument beginnende geletterdheid [Diagnostic instrument for emergent literacy]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
  • Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M., & Morris, R. D. (2010). The relationship between phonological processing skills and word and nonword identification performance in children with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1170–1175. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.08.004