603
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Lexical and Sublexical Phonological Effects in Chinese Silent and Oral Reading

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K. (2012). Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 634–640. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0277-0
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1-8). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  • Beijing Language Institute Publisher. (1986). Modern Chinese Word Frequency Dictionary (in Chinese). Beijing: Author.
  • Bélanger, N. N., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2013). Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2237–2252. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.780085
  • Chen, H.-C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 511–518. doi:10.3758/BF03196186
  • Chen, Y.-C., & Yeh, S.-L. (2015). Binding radicals in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 47–63. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.002
  • Coulmas, F. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Blackwell.
  • Daneman, M., & Reingold, E. (1993). What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 47(2), 153–178. doi:10.1037/h0078818
  • DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035–1045. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1
  • Fang, S. P., Hrong, R. Y., & Tzeng, O. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11–21). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
  • Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4), 1079–1100. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.1079
  • Halekoh, U., & Højsgaard, S. (2014). A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models - The R Package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(9), 1-30. doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i09
  • Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
  • Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in Psychology, 90, 111–130. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61889-0
  • Hue, C.-W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. Advances in Psychology, 90, 93–107. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61888-9
  • Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 612–624. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90382-7
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20–34.
  • Inhoff, A. W., Pollatsek, A., Posner, M. I., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert attention and eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 63–89. doi:10.1080/14640748908402353
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2014). Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis. Visual Cognition, 22, 354–367. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.879630
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439. doi:10.3758/BF03208203
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1994). Use of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading and in on-line and delayed naming tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 689–713. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1033
  • Jared, D., Ashby, J., Agauas, S. J., & Levy, B. A. (2016). Phonological activation of word meanings in grade 5 readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(4), 524–541. doi:10.1037/xlm0000184
  • Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (2009). An improved approximation to the precision of fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53, 2583–2595. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2008.12.013
  • Kliegl, R., & Laubrock, J. (2017). Eye-movement tracking during reading. In A. M. B. de Groot & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 68–88). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., & Richter, E. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655–681. doi:10.1080/13506280902986058
  • Laubrock, J., & Hohenstein, S. (2012). Orthographic consistency and parafoveal preview benefit: A resource-sharing account of language differences in processing of phonological and semantic codes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 292–293. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000209
  • Laubrock, J., & Kliegl, K. (2015). The eye-voice span during reading aloud. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:(1432). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01432
  • Lee, C.-Y, Tsai, J.-L, Chiu, Y.-C, Tzeng, O. J. L, & Hung, D. L. (2006). The early extraction of sublexical phonology in reading chinese pseudocharacters: An event-related potentials study. Language and Linguistics, 3, 619–636.
  • Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Su, E. C.-I., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2005). Consistency, regularity, and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 75–107.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
  • Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1213–1227. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
  • Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494–1502. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y
  • Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York, NY: Viking.
  • McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. doi:10.3758/BF03203972
  • Pan, J., Laubrock, J., & Yan, M. (2016). Parafoveal processing in silent and oral reading: Reading mode influences the relative weighting of phonological and semantic information in Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1257–1273. doi:10.1037/xlm0000242
  • Pan, J., Yan, M., & Laubrock, J. (2017). Perceptual span in oral reading: The case of Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 254–263. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1283694
  • Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148–162.
  • R Development Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
  • Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473–483. doi:10.1037/h0080111
  • Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Binder, K. S. (1998). Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 476–497. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.476
  • Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & D’Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 1021–1046. doi:10.1080/713755859
  • Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implicatins for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00519
  • Sparrow, L., & Miellet, S. (2002). Activation of phonological codes during reading: Evidence from errors eetection and eye movements. Brain and Language, 81, 509–516. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2543
  • Tsai, J.-L., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in Traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 17–23. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.004
  • Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235–244. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.02.005
  • Tsang, Y.-K., Wu, Y., Ng, H. T.-Y., & Chen, H.-C. (2016). Semantic activation of phonetic radicals in Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 618–636. doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1246744
  • Tzeng, O. J. L., Zhang, H. L., Hung, D. L., & Lee, W. L. (1995). Learning to be a conspirator: A tale of becoming a good Chinese reader. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach (pp. 227–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Vasilev, M. R., & Angele, B. (2017). Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 666–689. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1147-x
  • von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003
  • Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H.-C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text: Evidence from eye fixations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 461–480. doi:10.1080/016909699386158
  • Wu, N., Zhou, X., & Shu, H. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese: A development study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 503–524. doi:10.1080/016909699386176
  • Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1669–1676. doi:10.1037/a0019329
  • Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561–566. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.561
  • Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1069–1075. doi:10.1037/a0026935
  • Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 41, 209–219. doi:10.10037/a0038097
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999a). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579–606. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2663
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999b). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 37–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1245–1265. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1245
  • Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–565. doi:10.1080/016909699386185
  • Zhou, Y. (1980). Pronunciations of phonetics within compound characters. Changchun, China: Jilin People’s Publisher. (Original work in Chinese).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.