Word Properties Predicting Children’s Word Recognition

References

• Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814–823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439–461. doi:10.3758/BF03214334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The celex lexical database. Technical report, Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133(2), 283–316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 545–559. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. doi:10.1177/0963721417727521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 441–458. doi:10.1037/xhp0000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement (pp. 65–116). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(3), 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2006). How does orthographic learning happen? In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 151–179). Hove, England: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203841211
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi:10.1177/1529100618772271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer, M., Dingshoff, D., De Beer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2010). Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), 187–204. doi:10.1177/1367006910381189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. I., Arnell, R., Birchenough, J. H., Grimmond, D., Houlson, S., & Greene, R. L. (2017). Reading through the life span: Individual differences in psycholinguistic effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1298–1338. doi:10.1037/xlm0000366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., & Storms, G. (2013). Better explanations of lexical and semantic cognition using networks derived from continued rather than single-word associations. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 480–498. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0260-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C., Glotin, H., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2010). A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 669–694. doi:10.1080/09541440903031230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagiolo, G. (2007). Clustering in complex directed networks. Physical Review E, 76(2). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026107
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frishkoff, G. A., Perfetti, C. A., & Collins-Thompson, K. (2010). Lexical quality in the brain: ERP evidence for robust word learning from context. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 376–403. doi:10.1080/87565641.2010.480915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 43–67. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herdağdelen, A., & Marelli, M. (2017). Social media and language processing: How Facebook and Twitter provide the best frequency estimates for studying word recognition. Cognitive Science, 41(4), 976–995. doi:10.1111/cogs.12392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedemaker, R. S., & Gordon, P. C. (2017). The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 43(5), 881–902. doi:10.1037/xhp0000377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y., Bird, M., Norris, H., Pagán, A., & Nation, K. (2020). The influence of item-level contextual history on lexical and semantic judgments by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2367. doi:10.1037/xlm0000795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y., & Nation, K. (2018). Semantic diversity, frequency and the development of lexical quality in children’s word reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 114–126. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23(6), 572–577. doi:10.1177/0956797611435921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, B. T., Dye, M., & Jones, M. N. (2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1214–1220. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0980-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N., Dye, M., & Johns, B. T. (2017). Context as an organizing principle of the lexicon. In B. H. Ross Ed., Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 67, pp. 239–283). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Juul, H., Poulsen, M., & Elbro, C. (2014). Separating speed from accuracy in beginning reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1096–1106. doi:10.1037/a0037100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karageorgos, P., Müller, B., & Richter, T. (2019). Modelling the relationship of accurate and fluent word recognition in primary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 76, 101779. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 459–470. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S. (2008). A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 232–235. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.1.232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2010). Size does not matter, frequency does: Sensitivity to orthographic neighbors in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(2–3), 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, V. E., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98(2), 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V_Links: Beyond vocabulary depth. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4, 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Monster, I., Tellings, A., Burk, W. J., Keuning, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021). Assessing children’s incremental word knowledge in the upper primary grades. Language Testing, 38(4), 536–557. doi:10.1177/0265532220961541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Castles, A. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, and R. K. Parilla (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 147–168). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/swll.15
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. NPJ Science of Learning, 2(1), 3. doi:10.1038/s41539-017-0004-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The university of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36(3), 402–407. doi:10.3758/BF03195588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the english lexicon project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 45–52. doi:10.3758/BF03193811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 785–797. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Soares, A. P., & Comesaña, M. (2013). Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 37–44. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2017) Lexical quality revisited. In E. Segers, E., and Van den Broek, P. (Eds.), Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In Honor of Ludo Verhoeven, 51–68.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamnins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Siakaluk, P. D., Bodner, G. E., & Pope, J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 161–167. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M. (2012). Meaning-based influences on visual word recognition. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Current issues in the psychology of language. Visual word recognition: Meaning and context, individuals and development (pp. 24–43). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(5), 377–500. doi:10.1080/02643299308253469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K. (2016). Visual word recognition. In Hickok, G., and Small, S. L. Neurobiology of language. (pp. 255–264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/C2011-0-07351-9
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 219–238. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., Isberner, M. B., Naumann, J., & Neeb, Y. (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 415–434. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.764879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S. (2017). The developmental lexicon project: A behavioral database to investigate visual word recognition across the lifespan. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 2183–2203. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0851-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S. (2018). Differences in visual word recognition between L1 and L2 speakers: The impact of length, frequency, and orthographic neighborhood size in german children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 319–339. doi:10.1017/S0272263117000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 267–298. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit - A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. doi:10.1177/0098628316677643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellings, A., Hulsbosch, M., Vermeer, A., & Van den Bosch, A. (2014). BasiLex: An 11.5 million words corpus of Dutch texts written for children. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 4, 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Boer, M., De Jong, P. F., & Haentjens-van Meeteren, M. M. (2012). Lexical decision in children: Sublexical processing or lexical search? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1214–1228. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.652136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhelst, N. D., Glas, C. A. W., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (1995). OPLM one parameter model computer program and manual. Arnhem, Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Verhelst, N. D., & Glas, C. A. W. (1995). The one parameter logistic model. In Fischer, G. H., and Molenaar, I. W. Rasch models. (pp. 215–237). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 502–529. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M. (2012). An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar