Plausibility and Syntactic Reanalysis in Processing Novel Noun-noun Combinations During Chinese Reading: Evidence From Native and Non-native Speakers

References

• Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1986). Sentence processing in Chinese-American bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(2), 136–162. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(2), 265–270. doi:10.3758/BF03212949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2011). LME4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package Version 0.999375-39.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 615–634. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00539-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. L. (2003). Developmental characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In C. McBride-Chang & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 157–169). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. C. (1999). How do readers of Chinese process words during reading for comprehension? In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 257–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. C. (1996). Chinese reading and comprehension: A cognitive psychology perspective. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 43–62). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y. Y., Zhao, J. J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 161–174. doi:10.1017/S136672890700291X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. A., Richard Ridderinkhof, K., Worm, M., Somsen, R. J., & Van Der Molen, M. W. (2004). Switching between spatial stimulus-response mappings: A developmental study of cognitive flexibility. Developmental Science, 7(4), 443–455. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00365.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 725–745. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1993). Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 247–275. doi:10.1037/h0078819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1998). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In J. D. Fodor, and F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer, 143–176.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenck-Mestre, C., Foucart, A., Carrasco-Ortiz, H., & Herschensohn, J. (2009). Processing of grammatical gender in French as a first and second language: Evidence from ERPs. Eurosla Yearbook, 9, 76–106. doi:10.1075/eurosla.9.06fre
   Google Scholar
• Gajewski, P. D., Wild-Wall, N., Schapkin, S. A., Erdmann, U., Freude, G., & Falkenstein, M. (2010). Effects of aging and job demands on cognitive flexibility assessed by task switching. Biological Psychology, 85(2), 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22(3), 369–397. doi:10.1191/0267658306sr272oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, H. (2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object–subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 129–173. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Staub, A., & Li, X. (2021). Prior context influences lexical competition when segmenting Chinese overlapping ambiguous strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 118(Article), 104218. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2021.104218
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., Pollatsek, A., Koski, M., & Olkoniemi, H. (2020). An eye-tracking study of reading long and short novel and lexicalized compound words. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(4), 3–20. doi:10.16910/jemr.13.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 20–34. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2012). That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 28(1), 69–101. doi:10.1177/0267658311432200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language Learning, 60(4), 877–925. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00577.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. N., & Dussias, P. E. (2009). Cross-linguistic differences and their impact on L2 sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 65–82. doi:10.1017/S1366728908003908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. N. (2007). The use and non-use of semantic information, word order, and case marking during comprehension by L2 learners of German. Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 418–432. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 603–634. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.x
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language processing research. Language Learning, 46(2), 283–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennison, S. M. (2005). Different time courses of integrative semantic processing for plural and singular nouns: Implications for theories of sentence processing. Cognition, 95(3), 269–294. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Kotz, S. A. (2009). A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. Brain and Language, 109(23), 68–74. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. doi:10.1177/0267658308100283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67. doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
   Google Scholar
• Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese Research Team. (2008). Lexicon of common words in contemporary Chinese. Beijing, China: Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6) 1139–1162. Advanced online. 10.1037/rev0000248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Li, W., Lin, N., Li, X., & . (2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading? PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55440. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154–193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eyetracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 940–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Cook, A. E., Juhasz, B. J., & Frazier, L. (2006). Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 467–482. doi:10.1348/000712605X89363
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 1–21. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299–331. doi:10.1017/S0142716410000421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabakova, R. (2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slatterly, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 104–120. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Majewski, H. (2007). The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: Evidence from noun–noun compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(6), 1162–1169. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2007). The parser doesn’t ignore intransitivity, after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 550–569. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 136–150. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Chen, H. C., Yang, J., & Mo, L. (2008). Immediacy of integration in discourse comprehension: Evidence from Chinese readers’ eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 241–257. doi:10.1080/01690960701437061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Möbius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 509–540. doi:10.1017/S0142716401004027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2006). Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 71–88. doi:10.1017/S1366728905002385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. M., Wang, S. P., Chen, H. C., & Rayner, K. (2009). The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 37(8), 1164–1176. doi:10.3758/MC.37.8.1164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Staub, A., Li, N., Wang, S., & Rayner, K. (2012). Plausibility effects when reading one- and 2-character words in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1801–1809. doi:10.1037/a0028478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, P., & Chen, B. (2016). Cross-linguistic differences affect late Chinese-English learners on-line processing of English tense and aspect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 268–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Li, X. (2021). On the segmentation of Chinese incremental words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000984
   Google Scholar